­
15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0
March 2025

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (XII)

0 Comments
Any born again Christian who does not exercise faith to receive this divine gift misses out in this rapturous elevation. Most definitely, things will be revealed to you; things most fail to see concerning the facticity of Scripture. Is it not a thing of pride that you are having a phone conversation with the most powerful head of government? How lowly the pride goes when the conversation is with the Most High Jehovah, the Creator Himself? Apostle Joshua Selma is quite obsessed with spiritual power such that he will do anything no matter how Scriptural anomalous it stands. In one of his spiritual excursions he, together with other insincere church leaders, went to visit the tomb of William Marrion Branham – one of the greatest evangelists of our time – and received an impartation of spiritual power from the Holy Spirit by touching the dead man’s tomb! What does this mean? I will tell you what it insinuates. The tombs of Archbishop Idahosa, Moses Orimolade, S.B.J. Oshoffa, Joseph Ayo Babalola, Prophet T.B. Joshua, Olumba Olumba Obu, Pope Leo I, Smith Wigglesworth, Kathryn Kuhlman, Kenneth E. Hagin, Reinhard Bonnke and many others must receive visitations from Christians who crave idolatrous version of spiritual harvests of Holy Spirit’s impartation. Apostle Joshua Selma picked leaves and petals from the grave side of Branham’s tomb, took them home, mixed them thoroughly in unguents and bottled them for sale. To those who will buy his apothecary jars and bottles, they believe, unfortunately, will constantly be dealing supernaturally with the Holy Spirit, Jesus Christ and, of course, make approachable the eternal Father, Whose divine brightness is unapproachable. My philosophical rumination taught me, as a teenager, that Lucifer should be as powerful as Jehovah to go against the LORD God – he is still roaming about in his acts of Satanism – and nothing seems to dislodge the status quo. But having understood the word of God, I know that belief is a mere rationalism of fallen carnality of Adamic propensity. Lucifer fell, becoming an exact opposite of good; the truth, of course, is that his evil power is an infinitesimal lowness compared to the Creator. Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (XI)

0 Comments
Apostle Peter was not infallible as this incident shows; so, how can the Pope of Catholicism ascribe infallibility to the carnality of his existence and his ipseity? The same Roman Catholic Church added an unscriptural prayer for the dead, ostensibly, to create avenue of wealth for the Catholic Church. What scriptural wisdom lies in “May his soul rest in peace” when one comes to the understanding of Hebrews 9:27 “And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:” which the Pope together with Catholicism is too impervious to acknowledge. Roman Catholic Church also embarked on the promulgation of 1190 A.D. It is: “The sale of indulgences, commonly regarded as a purchase of forgiveness and a permit to indulge in sin. It can also be purchased on behalf of a dead loved one.” Roman Catholic Church cannot be trusted. I have always found it so unbelievable listening to professed Christians solemnly petitioning, “May his soul rest in peace,” in prayer to God when someone dies. Honestly, you cannot be a knowledgeable person of Christianity to offer such scriptural anomaly. Do these Church going people know the origin of this rampant gaucherie? In the year 310, well over a thousand ago, the Roman Catholic Church institutionalised: “Prayers for the dead and the sign of the cross.” Speaking in tongues is the evidence of the new birth in Christ Jesus. If you are God’s child, should you not have a language just for the two of you? 1Corinthians 14:2 “For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.”Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (X)

0 Comments
I, honestly, did not know whether I should laugh or pity Dr. Damina watching the video as he taught that the elder, seated on one of the twenty-four celestial thrones, forming an ark round the throne of God the Father, did not know the word of God because he described Jesus as the Lion of Judah. Damina just opens his mouth and allows anything that feels like dropping out of his mouth have its way through. Dr. Damina would not agree with the epithetical Lion of the Tribe of Judah. He teaches that because the lion is a beast, therefore, it cannot be applied to Jesus Christ, the Saviour. Is Damina the Apostle John who wrote The Book of Revelation? Do you know what is funny? He said, “Jesus is the Lamb of God, not a lion.” Hear his argument, “How can Jesus be a lamb and a lion at the same time? It doesn’t make sense.” So, you see, Damina does not teach the Bible according to the revealed Word; he prefers to teach God’s word according to what he feels based on logical reasoning of Adamic fashioning. This is what eisegesis or isogesis is all about. Maybe Jacob, the father of Israel, was struggling with caducity when he prophesied concerning Judah in Genesis 49:9-10. Damina’s system of sermocination is likened, in all wise, to the way of rap music. You see, when they began to punctuate the music industry with rap, I said to myself, “Man, a fallen creature, has begun to talk.” The rhythmic captivity and the pulsating strength that run underground the rap genre give beauty to it. But when you pay attention to the lyrical rendition, it is nothing short of the vagrant stray, both to the left and right of Divine warning. Rap publishes prevailing ills of society; good. Are their lyrics not laced with vulgarism of Satanism? Most of today’s supposedly teaches of the Bible are mere motivational speakers, devoid of the kennel of the kerygma. The rap music is a societal pollution; so are the biblical teachings of Dr. Abel Damina. Apostle Michael Orokpo gave a teaching on Zion and said this in conclusion, “This is why some of you will go to heaven and yet will not see Jesus for eternity.” This teaching does not string any connection to the revealed Scripture. I do not know what arcane version of the Bible Oropko studies for his apostolic didacticism. What is the meaning of Zion? It is defined as ‘parched land, sunny mountain and by extension – probably from its height – a fortress, hence, divinely fortified people of the Most High.’ Zion of heaven is the assemblage of the redeemed saints of Jesus, or the Born Again Christians. Michael Oropko maintains that the celestial Zion is a place for only those who practised Christianity well enough to receive rewards in heaven. Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (IX)

0 Comments
Damina, unfortunately, had to mention names of prominent rich people who have nothing to do with the Church of the Living God, to prove that the Church cannot make anybody rich. Definitely, Dr. Damina did not acquire his riches through the blessing of the Author of the Church. You know what Damina said, “If you want to make money, go outside the Church.” Unbelievable, you must agree. Damina said that Solomon did not have to ask God for money because kings are always rich, especially, with David as his father. If Solomon had depended on the treasure left by David, for the building of the Jerusalem Temple, it would not have been Solomonic grand. Is it not good that Damina will spill out from his pastoral mind that Solomon was already rich and did not need to ask for what he already had, which is quite logical. But it is very wise to place logicality side by the side theological flawlessness to arrive safely at the true mind of God. Damina, what is really wrong with your reasoning? Are you absolutely sold to the enemy of Scripture? Let us look at what many people do not seem to see. Why would God say to Solomon, “And I have also given thee that which thou hast not asked, both riches, and honour: so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days;” if Solomon had all the riches he needed? Is God verbose? Is God not the absolute Economist when it comes to word usage? Does the last sentence of 1Kings 3:13 not expressly say from God’s holy mouth, “so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days”? King Solomon was not this rich. Damina’s warped mind of Sabellianism does not know this simple fact. His thoughts are far from the Most High Jehovah. Damina’s insistence that, “go outside the Church to make money,” is terribly flawed. Satanism has perfectly bewitched you, Abel Damina, to the point of absolute beguilement! Eden Garden is God’s House, which is not different from the Church. Rivers that flowed out of Eden is laden with riches. In Eden the LORD God visited them every cool of the evening. Eden is the first Church; riches flowed from Eden (Genesis 2:10-12). Does Jesus promise John 14:14, “If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it”? Why should we go to Church, ask Jesus of riches, and it will amount to theological faux pas? The Church is one stop shop for all needs of Adamic creatures; with faith that is solely based on the revealed word of God.Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (VIII)

0 Comments
Does this narrative portray Abraham as a shrewd, wicked businessman? A prevailing circumstance demanded Abraham’s reaction. The word ‘kindness,’ chêsêd (kheh’-sed), contextually means: ‘In a good sense, zeal towards any one, love.’ Abraham asked Sarah to express her wifely zeal by telling those who could feel jealous of his fortune as her husband that she was his sister. Whether God rose to protect Abraham or not is adequately couched in Genesis 20:17 “So Abraham prayed unto God: and God healed Abimelech, and his wife, and his maidservants; and they bare children.” Why would God protect His friend? He had not evil intent; he was protecting his union with Sarah. His actions were, out of ignorance, fear driven and ungodly. There is absolutely nothing to prove that Abraham hatched this plan owing to bankrupt experience. Those who are impervious to theological facticity would ask, “How does the above 1Corinthians 9:9-14 serve as a correlation to tithes and offerings in Church?” Going back to the Old Testamentary order, how were the people of the Levitical priesthood sustained? What did they live on that kept them in good health in the Lord’s Temple? The people brought to them their offerings and, definitely, their tithes. What is Paul’s argument of “If others be partakers of this power over you, are not we rather? Nevertheless we have not used this power; but suffer all things, lest we should hinder the gospel of Christ.” For Paul to teach that apostleship is in every way likened to the priesthood, the lawfully expected guerdons for the apostles and pastors must include tithes and offerings; simply because that was what their priest counterparts received. Is there anything wrong with catering for the sustenance of the ecclesiastical headship of the Church? Having toiled hard to give the laity spiritual revelatory knowledge, where is the sin in the continuation of offerings and tithes?Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (VII)

0 Comments
A sizeable number of them are of the ecclesiastical office of Prophets, claiming to hear directly from God, things the Bible is very silent about – which should not be taught. Many pride themselves with apostolic office, which is acquired from the apostles under whom they served. What does that mean? A self-styled Apostle is seen appointing another as an Apostle. Preposterous! There is no kingdom that does not engage in seriousness of economics. The Kingdom of God, run by the Church cannot be an exception. How can one give offerings if one is absolutely broke? Can a jobless person gather from nothing to give tithes? Why would Paul say, “But my God shall supply?” The conjunctional use of “but” makes the providential supply contingent on Paul’s reception of what church members give to him. Sowing and reaping, in faith, is what the Church economy is all about (2Corinthians 9:6-11). Two of the ways of giving to the Church in fulfillment of Pauline Philippians 4:15-19 is tithes and offering. Malachi 3:10 is Divine legality for prosperity activation in the Kingdom of Jehovah: “if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing, that there shall not be room enough to receive it.” If Damina teaches that the Bible is a poor material for money making, is this eisegesis or exegesis, considering the Bible verses I have treated so far? And if Damina should insist that Malachi 3:10 is of Old Testamentary order of Divine economy, Damina should show the world where God said so in the Holy Writ. Where the Bible is silent on any subject, we cannot, from our understanding, teach the same. It simply amounts to eisegetical stray of Satanism. Disheartening, it is, to know that someone who claims to be a Bible teacher will resort to tarnishing the image of Abraham, calling him a wicked businessman. Has Damina not gone round the bend? Where is the incongruity here? Genesis chapter 12 proves Damina’s incongruous handling of Scripture, concerning Abraham. So, let us go there to attest to Damina’s eisegetical inordinateness.Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (VI)

0 Comments
The philosophy behind tithing is captured in what Melchizedek told Abraham. Genesis 14:19-20 19) “And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: 20) And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.” On account of the fact that Jehovah is the Possessor of everything found, gained and owned, it is apropos and most wise to offer a reasonable portion in honour to the Divine Owner of all. Abraham was never hand or arm twisted to give the first ever tithe – outside the Mosaic Law –; neither did Abraham give the tenth of the best part of what divine aid put in his grip out of sheer religious superstition. He offered the first ever tithe very willingly, knowing fully well that he was truly honouring God with his possession. Abraham gave based on the philosophy of: God is possessor of heaven and earth. This takes us to the teaching of the wisest man that ever lived. Solomon, known for laconic expressions, wrote in Proverbs 3:9-10 “Honour the LORD with thy substance, and with the firstfruits of all thine increase: 10) So shall thy barns be filled with plenty, and thy presses shall burst out with new wine.” We understand where Solomon got his wisdom (1Kings 3:11-13). The words of Solomonic Book of Proverbs are actually Divine communication to mankind. And if Solomon wrote, “Honour the LORD with thy substance,” and it is quite understandable that tithing was prevalent among God’s people when Solomon wrote this verse; it must continue in God’s House, the Church. Church tithing promises, from the mind and intent of the Divinity, much, much more than what one gives in God’s Church: for it says through the Spirit inspired, “So shall thy barns be filled with plenty, and thy presses shall burst out with new wine.” Solomon must, of necessity, employ laconicism in every verse of the Book of Proverbs; maxims do not have to beat about the bush to get thoughts, especially, that of the Divinity across to those who wish to walk with the LORD God. Whoever warped Damina’s mind against the LORD hates him too much. The words of the Proverbs of Solomon, coming from God’s oracular afflatus, must, of necessity, be eternal.Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (V)

0 Comments
Is the Bible bereft of wealth creativity for the children of God? Would one not think that God’s decision not to allow any particular tribal land for the tribe of Levi meant that acquisition of wealth was out of the lives of the Levi Tribe? Levi might not have a bestowal of inheritance, like other tribes, but the beneficence of the God of Israel is seen in Numbers 18:21-24 Monetary tithes and offerings, agricultural offerings and, definitely, personal gifts from satisfied individuals and groups got lavished on official members of the Levitical priesthood. Damina, they were not poor church people. It is an unfortunate, vitiated utterance from Dr. Damina that, “The Bible is a poor material for money making.” The truth is that I am happy that he actually taught that. When God wants to ridicule a wayward person, He allows him to commit terrible blunders. If the express Word of God cannot make someone rich, what or who can? Who made Abraham very rich? Was Prophet Malachi delusional when he penned Malachi 3:8-12? Can you not see that this vaticination is unquestionably God’s act of enriching the Church? What is the Hebraic word for ‘storehouse’? It is ‘ôtsâr (o-tsaw’): ‘Properly, what is laid up, a store, stock, treasure, store, as of corn, food, provision (magazine), especially of gold, silver, and other precious things, hence used of the treasury of the temple.’ Read More