15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0

H.O. Ojewale

doctrinal issues

Judge Not (part three)

September 30, 2026

Can there be a true breach of righteousness in Christianity? A good study of Scripture points abundantly otherwise. That which makes one a born again Christian – child of God – is never earned as a result of an individual’s righteousness. It is strictly a Divine gift after one has genuinely accepted the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Does a Christian dwell in righteousness by his good deeds? Philippians 3:9 “And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:” shows clearly that my human righteousness cannot account for the soteriological quiddity. Romans 5:21 says, “That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.” Can we not see very clearly that the righteousness question has been theologically met in Christ Jesus? The Book of John explicitly told us in the verse that happens to be the microcosm of the entire Bible that on account of the love God showered on those who believe in the finished work the sanguineous Golgotha, He gave to us what is called eternal life.Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

2Timothy 4:10, born again, Can there be a true breach of righteousness in Christianity?, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Jesus Christ, Judge Not, Matthew 7:1-2, Philippians 3:9, righteous and unrighteous judgements, righteousness is of God by faith, Romans 3:27-28, Romans 5:21, The Bible

Judge Not (part two)

September 24, 2026

I have always maintained that, “If I see you, and hear you do a thing, I’ll judge you.” When I see two unmarried male and female in active coition, my judgment is simple, “You have committed the sin of fornication.” You entered another person’s apartment and you came out with the owner of the apartment’s phone, and the person asked, “Who made an entrance into my flat,” wanting to know who had taken his phone and you keep mum. I ask you what you went there for, and you brazenly tell me, “I didn’t go there;” I will call you a thief. Why? I saw you when you entered and when you walked out pocketing the phone which you and I know is not yours. If you happen to be seated by me in a public transport and receiving a phone call, you tell the caller, “I am standing at the Local Government Council Chairman’s door; call me in two hours’ time,” I will judge your act, and call you, “A liar!” I will judge you when I see you and hear you loudly and clearly; and I will not be running into any misbehaviour because my judgment is not a rash one. This is what we should be talking about: unrighteous judgment. We can judge as long as it is in strictness of righteousness.Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

2Chronicles 19:6, born again, Christianity, Deuteronomy 1:17, doctrinal issues, Exodus 23:2-3, Genesis 2:16-17, James 2:9, Jesus Christ, Judge Not, Matthew 7:1-2, Psalm 82:2, righteous and unrighteous judgements, The Bible

Judge Not (part one)

September 19, 2026

Verse one of Matthew chapter 7 is, number one, the preamble to what Jesus actually wanted to enrich man’s faculty of understanding with. Number two, verse one is not the conclusion; the concluding wholesomeness of this teaching is in the second verse. Half truths can be dangerously misleading. True contextual paraphrase of the two verses is like this: “Do not tag another with rash criticism, in order not to deserve sharp criticism. Because the degree of your wrong judgement will your criminality be.” We always forget that verse one does not stand alone. It is only complete in the next verse two. Jesus is, from this part of the long Sermon on the Mount, warning against censoriousness. “Don’t judge” is one of the didactic faux pas that thrives unnecessarily, and quite disappointingly, on various pulpits. Scriptural facticity points to righteous and unrighteous judgements. There are not three types of judgements. There are only two and they are righteous and unrighteous judgments. Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

Acts of the Apostles 17:31, born again, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Genesis 18:25, Isaiah 11:3-4, Jesus Christ, Judge Not, Leviticus 19:15, Matthew 7:1-2, Psalm 98:8-9, righteous and unrighteous judgements, The Bible

Inequalities Among The Godhead (Five)

John 10:30 “I and my Father are one. Because the Two eternal Ones are involved in this verse, esmen is appropriately an indication of Two distinct Persons of the Trinitarian Godhood. Now we arrive at the seemingly best part which is the last word, ‘one’. It is the Greek heis (hice): ‘a neuter and numeral one; essence.’ We understand, from Scriptural point of view that the Holy Spirit is in spiritual charge of the Church, while God the Father has no less involvement of the Church. It is of crystal clarity that the Sabbath Day represents the official period of fellowship with the Creator. Jesus made a mind-blowing statement of profundity in Matthew 12:8 “For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day.” His Lordship did not take precedence on the day He and His disciples ate of the cornfield in presence of the pharisaical inquisition. It dates back, scripturally, from the seventh day of re-creationism. Jesus Christ, a distinct Second Member of the Godhead, did create all that was created from Day 1 to Day 6. The creationism unavoidably includes the employments of bârâ' and ‛âśâh: while bârâ' speaks of ex nihilo, that is, create out of nothing, ‛âśâh is to create out of existing materials. Only an absolutely one hundred percent God can create out of absolutely nothing; and Matthew 12:8 reveals that that is what Jesus Christ did in creation. Creating out of nothing is not something one does through the protocol of delegation; one must be immanently Almighty to carry it out: and that exactly is Who and what Jesus is. It is what God the Father is, and the Holy Spirit as well. Selah.Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

born again, Christianity, Colossians 2:3, doctrinal issues, Does Christ know all things?, Father and the Son are of the same essence, For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day, For where two or three are gathered together in my name, Inequalities Among The Godhead, Jesus Christ, John 10:30, Matthew 12:8, Matthew 18:20, The Bible, the Trinitarian concept

Inequalities Among The Godhead (Four)

Jesus is called LORD or Yahweh in the vatic utterance of Isaiah 40:3 “The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make straight in the desert a highway for our God.” When you read the Bible and you see LORD (in capitals, in the Old Testament, it is the Hebrew tetragrammaton YHWH or the English Jehovah). Invoked as LORD is Jesus Christ in Joel 2:32 “And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered: for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the LORD hath said, and in the remnant whom the LORD shall call.” And it is important to confer with 1Corinthians 1:2-3 2) “Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours: 3) Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ.” John 5:23 reads, “That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. If there is no congruism of essence between the Son and the Father the Bible will not publish the documentation of this Divine congruity. Jesus cannot receive the same veneration as the Father if He is a being of the creationism. Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

Acts 20:28, born again, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Inequalities Among The Godhead, Isaiah 40:3, Jesus Christ, Jesus in Psalm 24:7; 1Corinthians 2:8; James 2:1; Jeremiah 23:5-6; 1Corinthians 1:30; Jesus in Psalm 97:9 & John 3:31; Zechariah 13:7; Philippians 2:6; Isaiah 6:1-3, Jesus is called Creator of all things, John 12:41, John 5:23, The Bible, the Trinitarian concept

Inequalities Among The Godhead (Three)

Proven equality among the Persons of the Godhead abound in Scripture. Only the I AM, Yahweh or LORD is truly worthy of worship; and that is what definitely separates Jehovah God from any other man, angel or idol. Every raised altar for the fellowship with God in the Bible had Jehovah in attendance. Maybe in the eternality of the future He would, but in these Adamic days, God the Father does not set His feet on earth, it was the Christ, the Second Member of the Godhead Who received the latria all the forty years of wilderness experience of Israel. After the completion of the Jerusalem Temple, built by Solomon, the LORD God of Israel, the Holy Spirit, is the Occupant of the holy of holies, the third compartment of the Temple of Jehovah, to receive the daily latria. The reason for this is quite simple. The Eternal Father is ever seated, physically, on the throne; the Incarnation of the Christ trod physically on the streets of Israel; it leaves the Holy Spirit to be the One to receive the latria none else is worthy to receive, seated on the mercy seat on the ark of covenant in the holiest compartment of the Temple. The Holy Spirit’s involvement in the creationism is the proof of His Deity, ergo, receives worship. The apogee of the re-creationism is the moulding and the eventual building of the Adam the male and Adam the female respectively; both having the image and likeness of the Creator. The first two humans remain the first ever Church in Eden of the earth. The Holy Spirit, Who generated enough Divine energy for the establishment of Church, Who also energized the nascent Church on Pentecost Day, must be the One to sit, the LORD God of Israel, in the Jerusalem Temple to receive worship, various oblatory rituals and to forgive their sins. Amen.Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

born again, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Genesis 1:1-3, Genesis 1:26, Inequalities Among The Godhead, Jesus Christ, John 1:1-9, John 9:5, The Bible, The Eternal Father is ever seated on the throne; the Incarnation of the Christ trod physically on the streets of Israel; the Holy Spirit receive the latria, The Light is a Personage, the Trinitarian concept, The True Light

Inequalities Among The Godhead (Two)

Two thousand years before Muhammad entered into the prophetic office of Islamism, the entire Bible had, already, the one and only thematic string of Jesus Christ woven intricately through every Book of the Scriptures. Muhammad should never have made any allusion of Jesus being Messiah and a Word from God. Agreeing with His Messianism makes Jesus Christ undeniably the Word of God. He cannot be the Word of God and not be equal to the Father: for you are your word, just as your word is undifferentiated essence of yourself. The only word from the mouth of Divinity is Jesus Christ, Whose goings forth has been from of oldness of everlasting, having no beginning nor ending, as eternal as God, ergo, God absolutely. Why God would choose Triune Divine manifestation is of “I-Thou”, “We-You” conceptualization. The LORD God sits, in heaven, a singular worshipped Entity but in order not to experience plurality from His creation God must manifest in plural. In all things He takes preeminence, ergo, the Godhead must have plurality of manifestation before anything comes into being. That is for His Personal reason. God knew that created man would sin, come short of God’s glory, and be condemned to death. As Singular of Divinity will lack, according to Divine protocol, what it takes to actuate the soteriology, it was important to have God eternally on the throne; God, the Third Member of the Godhead, as the unseen Holy Spirit, very immanent; and of course, the Incarnation, Immanuel, Christ Jesus, the Second Member of the Godhead, the Saviour – Who would Personally carry out the substitutionary death for mankind in agreement with the terms of grace. Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

born again, Christianity, Did the prophet of Allah call Jesus the Messiah?, difference between ‘ĕlôhı̂ym and ‘ĕlôahh, doctrinal issues, Inequalities Among The Godhead, Jesus Christ, Members of the Godhead, Messianism of Jesus Christ, Quran 3 verse 45, The Bible, the Trinitarian concept

Inequalities Among The Godhead (One)

Is the Quran referring to the God of the Bible, Jehovah, or that of Muhammad, Allah? Another reason to suspect Muhammad is where he got the sobriquet ‘Isa’ of Qur’anic tag. Yoruba people call Him Jesu. Hausa language renders it, Yesu. Gã language of Accra calls Him Yesu. Some Central African and South African tongues call Him Yesu. Hebraic couch is Yehoshua or Yeshua. The author of “Who Is This Allah”, G.J.O. Moshay, very knowledgeable in Arabic language said that if you check the language of Arab, there is no way the etymological stance of yehôshûa‛ (yeh-ho-shoo’-ah) should be rendered Isa in the Quran. Muhammad was either too ignorant of the biblical Jesus or just wanted to employ everything in the books of shenanigan to reprobate Christianity. Now let me take scriptural look at the above Quran verse and commentary. G.J.O. Moshay, the author of “Who Is This Allah”, gives a very profound description of Muhammad saying, “Muhammad is best a philosopher.” I read the book and what G.J.O. Moshay means is that Muhammad was more of a philosopher than the prophet of the God of the Bible. Philosophers, millennia before Muhammad and after his death, did all they could to wrestle with the protocolary documentation of the Scripture to no avail. You either fall in line with the Bible or stray into oblivion as far as theological facticity is concerned. You either believe the Word of God or get Satanism to distance you far away from the Way, the Truth, and the Life. Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

born again, Christianity, doctrinal issues, G.J.O. Moshay, Inequalities Among The Godhead, Jesus Christ, Persons of the Godhead, Prophet Muhammad of Islamism questioned the concept of the Trinity, Tafsir on Qur’an 23:91, The Bible, the Qur’an Al-Mu’minun 23:91, the Trinitarian concept

Does The Christ Know Everything? (4)

The prodigiosity of John 10:30, Lord’s revelation of Himself, is in this Greek heis which means ‘essence' from the contextualization of this verse. So, what is Jesus saying of Himself? “Whatever the Father, the First Member of the Godhead is, I Am. Is the Father omnipotent? So, I Am. The Father, seated on the throne is omnipresent, I, Jesus Christ, Am omnipresent as well. I, Jesus Christ, Am not less in Omniscience as the celestial God, surrounded by the twenty-four Elders, sitting Omnisciently in Majesty in the Rainbow Administration.” The ‘Son’ can only be ‘given' because He is not an object of creation. Christ Jesus is Which is, and which was, and which is to come. His Fatherhood goes beyond the ordinary; Prophet Isaiah called Him “The everlasting Father.” When an uncreated entity goes by Everlasting Father sobriquet, is it not clear that this One is an Entity of Divinity? If only the Father, according to Jesus, knows that day, and the same Christ, Who is of an unceasing Fatherhood – sharing Divine Fatherhood with the First Member of the Godhead –, where then is the doubtful argument of Christ’s ignorance coming from? Certainly, it cannot be from the Bible. This is the theological truth: it is the humanity of Him that had not the information, but the Christ, the Second Member of the Godhead, knew the day and hour of His second coming. Amen.Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

born again, Christ is the Personage of Isaiah 9:6, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Does The Christ Know Everything?, Jesus Christ, John 10:30, phenomenal facticity of John 3:13, Philippians 2:7, the ‘great kenosis' of Divinity, The Bible, the great kenoō, Why the Bible?

Does The Christ Know Everything? (3)

For Socrates' dualism the body is imperfect and temporary, whereas the soul is the perfect and permanent aspect of a person. And there is a scriptural problem with the teaching of Socrates. The perfection of the intelligent being was at the point of his creation. As Lucifer mismanaged his free moral agency and fell, so did the pristine man of Eden. Three important dialogues written by Plato: The Meno, The Phaedo, and The Phaedrus all argue that humans exhibit knowledge that they could not have obtained in their current life, presenting this as evidence for the soul’s pre-existence. There is a flaw in Plato’s dramatic presentation as far as scriptural facticity is concerned. There is not a smidgeon of evidence that Adam ever existed anywhere before his Eden occupation. The philosophers see Adamic dualistic structure. The Bible, the Word of God teaches that the breath of Divine puff into the lifeless Adam were lives i.e. soul and spirit. It is very important to let Descartes understand that man has a tripartite nature of spirit, soul and body forming an individuality: in one body. Augustine inherited this dualistic approach from Plato, who famously distinguished between the world of sensible things (the physical world) and the world of Forms (the world of ideal, non-material realities). However, Augustine’s dualism also integrated Christian theological concepts, which placed a significant emphasis on the soul as the seat of human identity and moral responsibility. It is spiritual faux pas to mingle Christianity with other forms of doctrines. It says, “and man became a living soul.” What does this mean? It means, Adam, of the redness of soil, metamorphosed into a living: intelligent entity. Jesus Christ is the incarnation of the LORD God, the Creator. God chose the womb of Mary for the Emmanuelisation of Christ, which is, and which was, and which is to come. Amen.Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

Augustine inherited this dualistic approach from Plato, born again, Christianity, Daniel 1:17, Descartes’ dualism, Deuteronomy 5:32, doctrinal issues, Does The Christ Know Everything?, Ezekiel 28:12 and 15, Genesis 1:26, Genesis 2:16, Genesis 2:7, Hebrews 4:12, Jesus Christ, Plato’s Meno Phaedo and Phaedrus, Socrates' dualism the body, The Bible, Why the Bible?

Does The Christ Know Everything? (2)

Is it possible to be in possession of absolute knowledge of God and not know everything in His mind? Now, before you go, “Eureka!” thinking you have just stumbled on a biblical verse of contradiction, there is absolutely no smidgeon of contradictory verses of the Bible. What Jesus Christ said in Mark 13:32, does not run contrary to John 10:15. Many times we see Jesus talking and behaving like a man. And many times, He talked like the Divine Jehovah of His essence. When He: hungered for food, thirsted for a drink, needed to bath, felt tired and found asleep, that was the humanity of the Christ: Jesus, the man. But when He said: “I am the way, the truth and the life, no man cometh to the Father except by me,” “Before Abraham was I Am”; “Without me, ye canst do nothing” “I am the resurrection and the life”, that was God, the Christ. One needs to apply the philosophy of ontologism to unravel Jesus Christ’s epithet of Divine appurtenant: “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty”. These epithets are absolutely of the Divinity. The remark of Mark 13:32 was made by the humanity of Christ, to Whom the hour and time had not been communicated to. How do I know that the Christ knew the day and hour? The Bible reveals the Omniscience of Christ in Colossians 2:3 “In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.”Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

born again, Christianity, Colossians 2:3, doctrinal issues, Does The Christ Know Everything?, Jesus Christ, John 1:1-3, John 10:15, Mark 13:32, T.D. Jakes preach, The Bible, the mind-blowing hypostatic union, theological ontologism as pertaining to the soteriology

Is Jesus Truly God? (5)

Jesus answered them in Matthew 12:8 “For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day.” This is the true unveiling of the Personage of Jesus. Tracing the title 'Lord’ of Matthew 12:8 to Exodus and Genesis, Jesus is appropriately the Self-Existent Yahweh of the Old Testamentary order. Jesus Christ, uncreated, is very God of very God, the Author of the creationism. The sole prophethood of Islamism, in all pellucidity, did not know what he was saying when he ascribed the Messianic status to Jesus. Ten times in the Qur’an: Aal-e-Imran 3:45; An-Nisa’ 4:157; An-Nisa’ 4:171; An-Nisa’ 4:172; Al-Ma’idah 5:17; Al-Ma’idah 5:72; Al-Ma’idah 5:75 and At-Taubah 9:30 Muhammad accepted Messianism of Jesus Christ of the Bible. It has its native origin in the Hebraic mâshı̂yach (maw-shee'-akh): ‘anointed one, Messianic prince: of the king of Israel and of the high priest of Israel; consecrated king, priest, or Saviour.’ Muhammad did not know that Messiah is the expected Saviour, King and High Priest of Israel – and by extension, the whole world. Had he known, Prophet Muhammad would never have called Jesus the Messiah or Christ. The Messianism of Jesus is essentially soteriological. Can it not only be a religious quackery, solidly backed by the tenets Satanism that will teach the possible destruction of the Messiah, the LORD from heaven? Sound theological reasoning will never allow the crossing of mind that the Person of Jesus could be destroyed by God the Father: for Jesus is the leitmotif of the entire Scriptural essence; Jesus is the only one who did not commit a single sin; the existing love among the Father, Son the Holy Spirit can never come to an end. What sense does it make that God would decide to destroy Jesus in Whom dwells all the treasures of knowledge and wisdom? Does the destruction of Jesus, as Muhammad erroneously put it, not make a huge nonsense of the salvation and the Church, the eternal Woman of Jesus Christ? The Bible says, "Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever” (Hebrews 13:8).Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, soteria, The Bible

1Corinthians 15:47, born again, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Exodus 16:29, Genesis 2:2, Hebrews 13:8, Is Jesus Truly God?, Jesus Christ, Jesus is appropriately the Self-Existent Yahweh of the Old Testamentary order, Matthew 12:8, Muhammad, Prophet Muhammad, Sōtēria, The Bible, the Lord of the Sabbath, Why, will God the Father destroy the Christ

Is Jesus Truly God? (3)

The existence of “I AM” is the timelessness of eternality. Jesus says His days of existence is eternally before anything was created, therefore, He is God – uncreated. How can Jesus say, “I am come to give you life and life more abundantly,” if He is not the Author of creationism and of life? The epithetical 'which is, and which was, and which is to come” does speak volumes. Jesus Christ is the Lord of the time of Adam – which is –; Christ has been before the creation of time – which was –; Jesus will continue to be LORD God in the eternality of the future – which is to come – and this is ponderous. Jesus is the LORD of lords and at the same time, the King of kings: for the Kingdom of God is absolutely in His hand. And to cap the quiddity of His Deity, Jesus actually calls Himself, “The Almighty!” Do a Scriptural fact check and the amazing outcome will be that, throughout the Scriptures none other, save God, has the attributive ‘Almighty’ which is pantokratōr (pan-tok-rat’-ore) and means: ‘he who holds sway over all things; the all ruling, that is, God (as absolute and universal sovereign).’ From this definition, Jesus is the pantokratōr in the sense of Omniscience, Omnipotence and Omnipresence, ergo, very God of very God. Hallelujah! It does not occur to many Bible reading minds who the Jehovah Personage of the Old Testamentary Order is. The Elohîym Godhood does not have Ten, Twelve or Four Gods. The LORD God decided, before the creationism, to exist in Three distinct Persons constituting One worshipped God, called Jehovah. This Divine decision was taken so that plurality will not be a concept that natural creation will possess before the Most High God does. Secondly, it is for the actualization of the soteriological quiddity. The Omniscient God knew man would need salvation, ergo, One of Them must be seated on the throne. Two of Them will supervise the terms and conditions of the soteriology.Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

Before Abraham was I am, born again, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Elohîym, Genesis 1:2, Is Jesus Truly God?, Jesus Christ, John 1:3, Revelation 1:8, Sōtēria, The Bible, The Holy spirit

Is Jesus Truly God? (2)

For uttering the words of John 10:30, this was the position of the Jews who understood the wordings of His asseveration: John 10:33 “The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.” Did Jesus make an asseveration of His Deity? Yes, so He did in John 10:11 “I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.” You may wonder, “What’s the big deal in being a shepherd?” This is the big deal. The minute Jesus uttered the words of John 10:11, He raced their Jewry minds to Psalms 23 and 80. The opening verse of Psalm 80 reads, “Give ear, O Shepherd of Israel, thou that leadest Joseph like a flock; thou that dwellest between the cherubims, shine forth.” Read this Psalm carefully and none needs to intimate you with this Shepherd of Israel. Who will a psalmist call on in prayer? He, absolutely, is the One of Psalms 5 and 55. Who is this Shepherd of Israel? Isaiah 40:11; Ezekiel 34:23; John 10:14; Hebrews 13:20; 1Peter 2:25 and 5:4 will tell you it is the LORD God of the Bible. Who led Joseph like a flock? Is it not the One and only Jehovah of Psalms 77:20 and 78:52; Isaiah 49:9-10 and Isaiah 63:11? It is the LORD, the Holy Spirit,God, Who dwells between the cherubim, the covering for the Ark of Covenant situated in the holy of holies (Psa 99:1; Exo 25:20-22; 1Sam 4:4; 2Sam 6:2; 2Ki 19:15; Eze 1:13; Eze 10:4). Psalm 23 commences with “The LORD is my Shepherd;” where the 'LORD’ is Hebrew יהוה Yehôvâh. Now, I believe you understand the reason why I said that the utterance of John 10:11 would have raced their Jewry minds to the Psalms. If Jesus Christ is the Good Shepherd, then He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and of the entire world. Yes, Jesus, the Son of man did come out of Mary in the annals of human history; but the Christ, dwelling in Him is ‘which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty;’ Who has no beginning and no ending, the Creator!Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, soteria, The Bible

'Ĕlôhı̂ym, born again, Christianity, Colossians 1:12-18, doctrinal issues, Hebrews 1:6, Is Jesus Truly God?, Jesus Christ, John 10:30, John 5:23, O Shepherd of Israel, Psalms 23 & 80, Revelation 7:10-12, soteria, The Bible, The LORD is my shepherd

Is Jesus Truly God? (1)

We know that the latria is offered strictly to the Divinity seated eternally on the celestial throne. The latria is seen given to God the Creator, the First Member of the Godhead, in Revelation 4:4; 4:8; 4:10 and 19:4. Revelation 5:8 “And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.” What will doubters of the Divinity of the Second Member of the Godhead, Who is also the Lamb of God, say to “fell down before the Lamb”? Is it possible that the four angels around the throne of Majesty together with the twenty-four elders will ever prostrate before a created being in worship even where the Father is seated? Will the host of heaven bow in adoration before Jesus if the Christ is not Deity? Jesus Christ, Whose appearance is exactly of the Father, ‘did not think it as something to brag about’ is what thought it not robbery to be equal with God of verse six is saying. He that is very God of very God took upon Himself the likeness of a servant for the actuation of the soteriology. Is God alone not regarded as the Saviour; how does one explain the fact that Jesus also is the Saviour of the world? Simple: Jesus is wholly Divine, and is one with the Father!Read More

born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

'Ĕlôhı̂ym, born again, Christianity, Deuteronomy 10:17, doctrinal issues, Is Jesus Truly God?, Jesus Christ, Philippians 2:5-11, Revelation 4:4, The Bible, the latria, the Second Member of the Godhead

TASTY SATANISM (Nine)

I want to pose this to those who continue to follow the apostles of experiential Impartation, Encounters and Anointings. Which experience is truly rewarding, is it the one with fallen Adamic preachers – the one you get from creatures of fallen Adam – or that of Pentecostal Upper Room? What we fail to apprehend is simply that it is the ophidian pad and creep that informs us that the Holy Spirit’s indwelling is not enough. The Devil does this to get you on pilgrimages to encounter the demonic power of his prescription. More Church people – unfortunately – are operating under the influence of Satanism than that of the Holy Spirit’s. You do not know which Bible preachers are operating with the power of Hindu talisman. New Age adherents seek to obtain psychic vision and clairvoyance through development of The Third Eye. Anyone who is not satisfied with biblical protocol gets introduced to an undiluted pure evil of Satanism. This is what you peddle when you think and teach that the promised power of getting born again is not enough. The Devil who gives such spiritual assistance makes sure they also get stupendously rich, thereby, deceiving millions; especially, when miracles (often fake) get performed by them. So, why do you think Joshua Selma will say, “The Lord told me, ‘This light that came from Me to you, everywhere you go to preach there must be someone in that meeting that the light must come upon their destiny”? This is exactly what those who are wallowing in the syndromic attack of Pauline ear itching want to hear. They will easily fall for it, line, hook and sinker!Read More

born again, Christian Doctrine, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

1John 2:18-19, 2Timothy 4:3-4, Baba’láwo of Ifa Cult, born again, Cerinthus, Christian Doctrine, Christianity, doctrinal issues, itching ears, Jesus Christ, New Age adherents, Subtle importation of teachings into Scripture, TASTY SATANISM, The Bible

TASTY SATANISM (Eight)

February 28, 2026

Apostle Joshua Selma himself said, “Now, understand that every time we teach those things, the Bible is the foundational pattern for our spiritual growth. When we share these supernatural experiences it’s not to create a passion in you higher than your love for Scripture.” So, the question here is, “Where in the Scriptures does it say that the language of God is light or that you don’t have to talk to speak?” Methinks Apostle Joshua Selma said God does not use English, Greek or Hebrew to communicate? How come we read of Paul’s documentation, “I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?” I just hope he will not, in Abel Damina fashion, stick to his phony gun, arguing that that “saying in the Hebrew tongue,” is translators' manipulation. Subtle importation of teachings into Scripture with the sole aim of satanical scratch of syndromic itchy ears is unfortunately what these teachers are knowingly or unknowingly deep in perpetration. All that these people do is make mention of Jesus and the unwary lot get their minds swindled: with the subtle use of the Scripture. Now, we are of the understanding that mere calling of the name of Jesus and burst into tongues (which can be deceptive) are not the proofs of a good teacher of the Word. All Lucifer needs is for someone to start the unscriptural teaching and Satanism will provide that which makes the eisegesis very, very tasty in the ears of those suffering from Pauline ear itches.Read More

born again, Christian Doctrine, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible

‘hearing’ and ‘heard’ of Acts chapter 9 verse 7 and that of chapter 22 verse 9, Apostle Joshua Selma, born again, Christian Doctrine, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Exodus 20:22, Genesis 1:3, Genesis 17:3-4, Jesus Christ, Subtle importation of teachings into Scripture, TASTY SATANISM, The Bible

LUCIFER’S DESIRE TO BE GOD (3)

The Word of God clearly states in Matthew 26:28, “For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” Exegetical explanation of this verse is the Pauline, “For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second” (Hebrews 8:7). Sin robs one of all hopes, even the ones that stand good chances of activation. Adam behaved in this similitude, because Scripture did not report his plead for the original sin. Unlike Lucifer, whom I believe the LORD knew that he would not change at all, Adam, today, continues to walk to the Christian Church altar, praying the prayer of salvation. Lucifer could not envisage the future role of his crave. How could he, when he is not omniscient? Could he have seen what goes on everywhere simultaneously? He has not the faculty of the Omnipresence. Lucifer secretly, without permission, tampered with the knowledge of good and evil, and to his chagrin he lacked the enhancement of omnipotence to navigate through omniscience to traverse the labyrinth of the knowledge of good and evil. Lucifer, you failed. Amen. Read More

Bible, born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ

born again, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Ezekiel 28:12-15, Hebrews 8:7, Isaiah 14:12-17, Jesus Christ, LUCIFER’S DESIRE TO BE GOD, Lucifer’s failure, Matthew 26:28, mirage of deification, sin robs, The Bible

LUCIFER’S DESIRE TO BE GOD (2)

He did not even realize what the mere contemplation had caused: a stupid oozing drool from his lips. The beclouding stupidity of his bizarre desideration failed to point out the fact that each of the Beings of the Divinity is the Almighty, an uncreated Entity of eternality. Lucifer forgot that his existence came from the creative – bârâ’ –lips of his Creator. Son of the Morning, how could you be detached from the perfection of your making, and from the fact that you did not, like Jehovah, come into being by your own power? Your angelic sonship to the LORD God is not biological; it is not capable of rendering your son-placing a cultural equality with the Eternal Father, as it is obtained traditionally. It is the LORD’s call to create equality with Him, not ever yours – an object of creationism. Out of nothing, Satan the Devil, you came from; how could you not remember your bârâ’ nativity? Your stupidity has sentenced you back into nothingness. An entity of creationism cannot aspire to the status of worshipped God – it is a spiritual aberration. You must have the unparalleled qualifications of the three O’s – Omniscience, Omnipotence and Omnipresence – to receive the latria due to the ‘Ělôhı̂ym. The omniscience of the Godhead will not advance into the entertainment of hereticism. The Godhead, with Lucifer as a member, will, no doubt, mar Divinity with a freakish clown.Read More

Bible, born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ

born again, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Ezekiel 28:12, Jesus Christ, LUCIFER’S DESIRE TO BE GOD, Revelation 12:7-9, The Bible

LUCIFER’S DESIRE TO BE GOD (1)

What is scripturally clear is that a reading between the lines of God’s protocol will unmask the leader of the first coup d’etat, Satan the Devil, to be the one whose true sobriquet is Lucifer. Like my Pastor, Reverend Chris Okotie, will always say, everything goes back to Genesis; so to Genesis chapter three we start this exegetical trip of exposing Lucifer – I have always told him, “I’m going to expose you!” At the commitment of the original sin, God’s main object of judgement was the nailing of the evil spirit behind the serpentine meandering intrusion of God’s house: Eden. God did not go to Satan directly, He went to Adam who pointed to his wife, who in turn confessed in verse thirteen, “The serpent beguiled me and I did eat.”Read More

Bible, born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ

born again, Christianity, doctrinal issues, Isaiah 14:13-14, Jesus Christ, Lucifer, LUCIFER’S DESIRE TO BE GOD, The Bible