­
15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0

H.O. Ojewale

H.O. Ojewale

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (XII)

March 29, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Any born again Christian who does not exercise faith to receive this divine gift misses out in this rapturous elevation. Most definitely, things will be revealed to you; things most fail to see concerning the facticity of Scripture. Is it not a thing of pride that you are having a phone conversation with the most powerful head of government? How lowly the pride goes when the conversation is with the Most High Jehovah, the Creator Himself? Apostle Joshua Selma is quite obsessed with spiritual power such that he will do anything no matter how Scriptural anomalous it stands. In one of his spiritual excursions he, together with other insincere church leaders, went to visit the tomb of William Marrion Branham – one of the greatest evangelists of our time – and received an impartation of spiritual power from the Holy Spirit by touching the dead man’s tomb! What does this mean? I will tell you what it insinuates. The tombs of Archbishop Idahosa, Moses Orimolade, S.B.J. Oshoffa, Joseph Ayo Babalola, Prophet T.B. Joshua, Olumba Olumba Obu, Pope Leo I, Smith Wigglesworth, Kathryn Kuhlman, Kenneth E. Hagin, Reinhard Bonnke and many others must receive visitations from Christians who crave idolatrous version of spiritual harvests of Holy Spirit’s impartation. Apostle Joshua Selma picked leaves and petals from the grave side of Branham’s tomb, took them home, mixed them thoroughly in unguents and bottled them for sale. To those who will buy his apothecary jars and bottles, they believe, unfortunately, will constantly be dealing supernaturally with the Holy Spirit, Jesus Christ and, of course, make approachable the eternal Father, Whose divine brightness is unapproachable. My philosophical rumination taught me, as a teenager, that Lucifer should be as powerful as Jehovah to go against the LORD God – he is still roaming about in his acts of Satanism – and nothing seems to dislodge the status quo. But having understood the word of God, I know that belief is a mere rationalism of fallen carnality of Adamic propensity. Lucifer fell, becoming an exact opposite of good; the truth, of course, is that his evil power is an infinitesimal lowness compared to the Creator. Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (XI)

March 25, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Apostle Peter was not infallible as this incident shows; so, how can the Pope of Catholicism ascribe infallibility to the carnality of his existence and his ipseity? The same Roman Catholic Church added an unscriptural prayer for the dead, ostensibly, to create avenue of wealth for the Catholic Church. What scriptural wisdom lies in “May his soul rest in peace” when one comes to the understanding of Hebrews 9:27 “And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:” which the Pope together with Catholicism is too impervious to acknowledge. Roman Catholic Church also embarked on the promulgation of 1190 A.D. It is: “The sale of indulgences, commonly regarded as a purchase of forgiveness and a permit to indulge in sin. It can also be purchased on behalf of a dead loved one.” Roman Catholic Church cannot be trusted. I have always found it so unbelievable listening to professed Christians solemnly petitioning, “May his soul rest in peace,” in prayer to God when someone dies. Honestly, you cannot be a knowledgeable person of Christianity to offer such scriptural anomaly. Do these Church going people know the origin of this rampant gaucherie? In the year 310, well over a thousand ago, the Roman Catholic Church institutionalised: “Prayers for the dead and the sign of the cross.” Speaking in tongues is the evidence of the new birth in Christ Jesus. If you are God’s child, should you not have a language just for the two of you? 1Corinthians 14:2 “For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.”Read More
born again, Catholicism, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (X)

March 19, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
I, honestly, did not know whether I should laugh or pity Dr. Damina watching the video as he taught that the elder, seated on one of the twenty-four celestial thrones, forming an ark round the throne of God the Father, did not know the word of God because he described Jesus as the Lion of Judah. Damina just opens his mouth and allows anything that feels like dropping out of his mouth have its way through. Dr. Damina would not agree with the epithetical Lion of the Tribe of Judah. He teaches that because the lion is a beast, therefore, it cannot be applied to Jesus Christ, the Saviour. Is Damina the Apostle John who wrote The Book of Revelation? Do you know what is funny? He said, “Jesus is the Lamb of God, not a lion.” Hear his argument, “How can Jesus be a lamb and a lion at the same time? It doesn’t make sense.” So, you see, Damina does not teach the Bible according to the revealed Word; he prefers to teach God’s word according to what he feels based on logical reasoning of Adamic fashioning. This is what eisegesis or isogesis is all about. Maybe Jacob, the father of Israel, was struggling with caducity when he prophesied concerning Judah in Genesis 49:9-10. Damina’s system of sermocination is likened, in all wise, to the way of rap music. You see, when they began to punctuate the music industry with rap, I said to myself, “Man, a fallen creature, has begun to talk.” The rhythmic captivity and the pulsating strength that run underground the rap genre give beauty to it. But when you pay attention to the lyrical rendition, it is nothing short of the vagrant stray, both to the left and right of Divine warning. Rap publishes prevailing ills of society; good. Are their lyrics not laced with vulgarism of Satanism? Most of today’s supposedly teaches of the Bible are mere motivational speakers, devoid of the kennel of the kerygma. The rap music is a societal pollution; so are the biblical teachings of Dr. Abel Damina. Apostle Michael Orokpo gave a teaching on Zion and said this in conclusion, “This is why some of you will go to heaven and yet will not see Jesus for eternity.” This teaching does not string any connection to the revealed Scripture. I do not know what arcane version of the Bible Oropko studies for his apostolic didacticism. What is the meaning of Zion? It is defined as ‘parched land, sunny mountain and by extension – probably from its height – a fortress, hence, divinely fortified people of the Most High.’ Zion of heaven is the assemblage of the redeemed saints of Jesus, or the Born Again Christians. Michael Oropko maintains that the celestial Zion is a place for only those who practised Christianity well enough to receive rewards in heaven. Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (IX)

March 15, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Damina, unfortunately, had to mention names of prominent rich people who have nothing to do with the Church of the Living God, to prove that the Church cannot make anybody rich. Definitely, Dr. Damina did not acquire his riches through the blessing of the Author of the Church. You know what Damina said, “If you want to make money, go outside the Church.” Unbelievable, you must agree. Damina said that Solomon did not have to ask God for money because kings are always rich, especially, with David as his father. If Solomon had depended on the treasure left by David, for the building of the Jerusalem Temple, it would not have been Solomonic grand. Is it not good that Damina will spill out from his pastoral mind that Solomon was already rich and did not need to ask for what he already had, which is quite logical. But it is very wise to place logicality side by the side theological flawlessness to arrive safely at the true mind of God. Damina, what is really wrong with your reasoning? Are you absolutely sold to the enemy of Scripture? Let us look at what many people do not seem to see. Why would God say to Solomon, “And I have also given thee that which thou hast not asked, both riches, and honour: so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days;” if Solomon had all the riches he needed? Is God verbose? Is God not the absolute Economist when it comes to word usage? Does the last sentence of 1Kings 3:13 not expressly say from God’s holy mouth, “so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days”? King Solomon was not this rich. Damina’s warped mind of Sabellianism does not know this simple fact. His thoughts are far from the Most High Jehovah. Damina’s insistence that, “go outside the Church to make money,” is terribly flawed. Satanism has perfectly bewitched you, Abel Damina, to the point of absolute beguilement! Eden Garden is God’s House, which is not different from the Church. Rivers that flowed out of Eden is laden with riches. In Eden the LORD God visited them every cool of the evening. Eden is the first Church; riches flowed from Eden (Genesis 2:10-12). Does Jesus promise John 14:14, “If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it”? Why should we go to Church, ask Jesus of riches, and it will amount to theological faux pas? The Church is one stop shop for all needs of Adamic creatures; with faith that is solely based on the revealed word of God.Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (VIII)

March 12, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Does this narrative portray Abraham as a shrewd, wicked businessman? A prevailing circumstance demanded Abraham’s reaction. The word ‘kindness,’ chêsêd (kheh’-sed), contextually means: ‘In a good sense, zeal towards any one, love.’ Abraham asked Sarah to express her wifely zeal by telling those who could feel jealous of his fortune as her husband that she was his sister. Whether God rose to protect Abraham or not is adequately couched in Genesis 20:17 “So Abraham prayed unto God: and God healed Abimelech, and his wife, and his maidservants; and they bare children.” Why would God protect His friend? He had not evil intent; he was protecting his union with Sarah. His actions were, out of ignorance, fear driven and ungodly. There is absolutely nothing to prove that Abraham hatched this plan owing to bankrupt experience. Those who are impervious to theological facticity would ask, “How does the above 1Corinthians 9:9-14 serve as a correlation to tithes and offerings in Church?” Going back to the Old Testamentary order, how were the people of the Levitical priesthood sustained? What did they live on that kept them in good health in the Lord’s Temple? The people brought to them their offerings and, definitely, their tithes. What is Paul’s argument of “If others be partakers of this power over you, are not we rather? Nevertheless we have not used this power; but suffer all things, lest we should hinder the gospel of Christ.” For Paul to teach that apostleship is in every way likened to the priesthood, the lawfully expected guerdons for the apostles and pastors must include tithes and offerings; simply because that was what their priest counterparts received. Is there anything wrong with catering for the sustenance of the ecclesiastical headship of the Church? Having toiled hard to give the laity spiritual revelatory knowledge, where is the sin in the continuation of offerings and tithes?Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (VII)

March 8, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
A sizeable number of them are of the ecclesiastical office of Prophets, claiming to hear directly from God, things the Bible is very silent about – which should not be taught. Many pride themselves with apostolic office, which is acquired from the apostles under whom they served. What does that mean? A self-styled Apostle is seen appointing another as an Apostle. Preposterous! There is no kingdom that does not engage in seriousness of economics. The Kingdom of God, run by the Church cannot be an exception. How can one give offerings if one is absolutely broke? Can a jobless person gather from nothing to give tithes? Why would Paul say, “But my God shall supply?” The conjunctional use of “but” makes the providential supply contingent on Paul’s reception of what church members give to him. Sowing and reaping, in faith, is what the Church economy is all about (2Corinthians 9:6-11). Two of the ways of giving to the Church in fulfillment of Pauline Philippians 4:15-19 is tithes and offering. Malachi 3:10 is Divine legality for prosperity activation in the Kingdom of Jehovah: “if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing, that there shall not be room enough to receive it.” If Damina teaches that the Bible is a poor material for money making, is this eisegesis or exegesis, considering the Bible verses I have treated so far? And if Damina should insist that Malachi 3:10 is of Old Testamentary order of Divine economy, Damina should show the world where God said so in the Holy Writ. Where the Bible is silent on any subject, we cannot, from our understanding, teach the same. It simply amounts to eisegetical stray of Satanism. Disheartening, it is, to know that someone who claims to be a Bible teacher will resort to tarnishing the image of Abraham, calling him a wicked businessman. Has Damina not gone round the bend? Where is the incongruity here? Genesis chapter 12 proves Damina’s incongruous handling of Scripture, concerning Abraham. So, let us go there to attest to Damina’s eisegetical inordinateness.Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (VI)

March 4, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
The philosophy behind tithing is captured in what Melchizedek told Abraham. Genesis 14:19-20 19) “And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: 20) And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.” On account of the fact that Jehovah is the Possessor of everything found, gained and owned, it is apropos and most wise to offer a reasonable portion in honour to the Divine Owner of all. Abraham was never hand or arm twisted to give the first ever tithe – outside the Mosaic Law –; neither did Abraham give the tenth of the best part of what divine aid put in his grip out of sheer religious superstition. He offered the first ever tithe very willingly, knowing fully well that he was truly honouring God with his possession. Abraham gave based on the philosophy of: God is possessor of heaven and earth. This takes us to the teaching of the wisest man that ever lived. Solomon, known for laconic expressions, wrote in Proverbs 3:9-10 “Honour the LORD with thy substance, and with the firstfruits of all thine increase: 10) So shall thy barns be filled with plenty, and thy presses shall burst out with new wine.” We understand where Solomon got his wisdom (1Kings 3:11-13). The words of Solomonic Book of Proverbs are actually Divine communication to mankind. And if Solomon wrote, “Honour the LORD with thy substance,” and it is quite understandable that tithing was prevalent among God’s people when Solomon wrote this verse; it must continue in God’s House, the Church. Church tithing promises, from the mind and intent of the Divinity, much, much more than what one gives in God’s Church: for it says through the Spirit inspired, “So shall thy barns be filled with plenty, and thy presses shall burst out with new wine.” Solomon must, of necessity, employ laconicism in every verse of the Book of Proverbs; maxims do not have to beat about the bush to get thoughts, especially, that of the Divinity across to those who wish to walk with the LORD God. Whoever warped Damina’s mind against the LORD hates him too much. The words of the Proverbs of Solomon, coming from God’s oracular afflatus, must, of necessity, be eternal.Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (V)

March 1, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Is the Bible bereft of wealth creativity for the children of God? Would one not think that God’s decision not to allow any particular tribal land for the tribe of Levi meant that acquisition of wealth was out of the lives of the Levi Tribe? Levi might not have a bestowal of inheritance, like other tribes, but the beneficence of the God of Israel is seen in Numbers 18:21-24 Monetary tithes and offerings, agricultural offerings and, definitely, personal gifts from satisfied individuals and groups got lavished on official members of the Levitical priesthood. Damina, they were not poor church people. It is an unfortunate, vitiated utterance from Dr. Damina that, “The Bible is a poor material for money making.” The truth is that I am happy that he actually taught that. When God wants to ridicule a wayward person, He allows him to commit terrible blunders. If the express Word of God cannot make someone rich, what or who can? Who made Abraham very rich? Was Prophet Malachi delusional when he penned Malachi 3:8-12? Can you not see that this vaticination is unquestionably God’s act of enriching the Church? What is the Hebraic word for ‘storehouse’? It is ‘ôtsâr (o-tsaw’): ‘Properly, what is laid up, a store, stock, treasure, store, as of corn, food, provision (magazine), especially of gold, silver, and other precious things, hence used of the treasury of the temple.’ Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (IV)

February 26, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Damina teaches on wealth acquisition. I quote him verbatim: “If you follow the Bible to make money, you’ll be poor all your life. That’s why the poorest people are in Church.” According to this man, who believes he is a Bible teacher, “The Bible is a poor material for money making.” This is what Dr. Damina has to say about the great Patriarch of Israel, “Abraham was a shrewd, wicked businessman. When he discovered he was broke, he used his wife as collateral to bring money.” Is Dr. Abel Damina truly called by Jesus to pastor in the Lord’s vineyard? When I told a concerned Christian Brother, Joseph Uwana, that Damina probably takes something to enhance his idiosyncratic faux pas when it comes to biblical didacticism, the dear Brother said, “I believe he takes very huge doses of the substance:” which I want to agree with. Is it impossible that some haters of Jesus could have approached Damina with huge amount of money to get him to distort the Bible? One cannot rule out Damina's possibility of having dined with Satanism, ergo, his spirited voracity to impugn revealed words of theological flawlessness. The first thing to ask is how he came about the empirical data proving that the Church habours the poorest of the globe. We need to understand what the Bible is. It is the express Word of God, aimed at Adamic growth, restoration, salvation and nurture in all ramifications. God surrounded Adam and his Woman with everything that makes the unknown – phenomenality of lack – a nonexistent issue. The four rivers that ran out of Eden were filled with untold riches. Who put these riches there, Adam? If God is the Creator of wealth, can His love letter (the Bible) not contain modus of wealth acquisition? But trust Damina and his arcane sophistry. Damina will use eisegetical wickedness to debunk scriptural clarity – as if that does not constitute evil rascality when it comes to running a bucolic office of the Lord’s vineyard. Today’s Churches are truly filled with ear-itchy ignorant mass. They will choose to believe wrong teachings. Anyone who tells you that the Bible cannot make you rich is conversely saying that God cannot make one rich. Is God not the Author of the Bible? Is the Church, which is the house of God, not the pillar and ground of truth? Does it make any sense at all, that an architectural structure that domiciliates the assemblage of God’s children, cannot teach anyone how to become very wealthy? Is the Bible bereft of wealth creativity for the children of God?Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (III)

February 22, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
The philosophy of modalism has its quiddity sourced from linguistic manipulation to the enthronement of faces or modes culminating in the jettisoning of the theological Trinity. The sovereignty of the Most High Jehovah cannot, as a matter of fact, stop Him from using different faces of Divine manifestation. The problem of modalistic view arises from its detachment from revealed principle of the Bible. Modalism establishment of faces for Divine modus operandi stands a repudiation of Bible's distinction of Persons of the Godhead. Get them Scripturally cornered and what do you hear from their linguistic manipulation, “The Bible is filled with metaphorical innuendos.” Quite apropos is the facticity that the Author of the Bible must have the preeminence of being the first subject of reference in the first opening words of The Book. It says, “In the beginning God created…” and should it surprise me if they come up with, “The plurality of elohiym is metaphorically a mere deference to the Most High.” Whoever conjures that must reach deeper into the hat for more magical rabbits: for the same Bible has the Hebraic singular Eloah for the same Most High! Who constitute the “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness...” of the empyrean council as pertaining to the creationism? Was God engaged in divine soliloquy? Yes, He can decide what to do, but it is equally absurd to soliloquize Genesis 1:26, in the light of Trinitarian concept. Could He be addressing angels? They cannot be participatory authors of creationism for the obviosity of making them equally Gods of empyrean worship. Does the throne of the Rainbow Administration of Jehovah suffer vacuity? Modalism’s strictly oneness portrayal of Divinity means that He manifests as Christ, Father or Holy Spirit of His individualism. Does He leave one of His faces on the throne when He makes His divine manifestation away from heaven? The throne had never been unoccupied.Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (II)

February 17, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Some teachers of Bible believe this modalistic position of Monarchian sect, which by the reason of its Scriptural baselessness, makes it an incursion of Satanism with ineluctable ternary motto of come to steal, kill and destroy. The first sentence of the Bible bespeaks the Trinitarian concept. The fourth word of Genesis 1:1, ‘God’, is Elohiym, a plurality of the Members of the Godhead. The Father spoke in commencement of creationism. The ipseity of the Second Member, Christ, the Light of verse three, manifested physically to consummate re-creationism. In verse two, it says, “And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters” (Genesis 1:2). Was God talking to two disposable faces in the divine decision of Genesis 1:26? This One, Who walked up to and took from the One Who sits on the throne, possesses the feet and arms of eternality, ergo, He could achieve that feat of taking from the eternal hand of God, Who Himself is very God of very God. Did the LORD God divide Himself into the Eternal Father and the Lamb, the Son of God? The Bible says, “And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb,” signifying the absolute ipseity of the Second Member of the Godhead, Jesus Christ. Will the angelic awesome foursome bow in latria before another, other than the Eternality of the seated Father? You know something? Hawkers of the teaching of Divine oneness anomalism will want to argue that it is only the Christ – one of the masks of the Godhead – that is being given the latria in this verse.Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (I)

February 13, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Lucifer sought to promote himself to the status of a member of the council of the Godhead, in conspicuous flagrancy that tended to make nonsense of the Creator’s decision in creating him a serving angel and not a member of the Godhead. This stray turned Lucifer into the Devil. It is quite easy to become God’s antagonistic evil of Satanism. The minute you veer yourself off God’s scriptural tandem, something happens: the author of Satanism, who has actually devised and wished for you to follow him, will begin to open other books to feed your new vagrant estate. Why do philosophers continue to struggle with life without Jesus? They think they are too wise to be spiritually driven by the Word of God. We should be very careful about what we imbibe into our spiritual system. You cannot think outside the box, as far as the Holy Bible is concerned. Someone dared to embrace the inimical invitation of Lucifer’s teaching, forgetting that Satan comes to steal, kill and destroy. That someone is a North African Sabellius of Libya, born in the early third century AD, decided, on account of his satanic indoctrination, to float an egregious anomaly known as Sabellianism, also known as modalistic monarchianism. According to Epiphanius of Salamis, Sabellius used the sun’s characteristics as an analogy of God’s nature. Just as the sun has “three powers” (warmth, light, and circular form), so God has three aspects: the warming power answers to the Holy Spirit; the illuminating power, to the Son; and the form or figure, to the Father. Sabellius used the term “prosopa” which is Greek for “faces” to describe how the person of God has three faces, this idea is found in 2Corinthians 4:6 “…God’s glory displayed in the face (prosopon – singular form of prosopa) of Christ.”Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , ,

Covenant Between God And Man (five)

February 9, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
The same LORD God Who took upon Himself the flesh of humanity did sit among His disciples for the inauguration of the New Covenant. Remember He told them in John 6:56 “He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him”? Only if they knew this One present in their gaze was at once in heaven and very present before them – John 3:13 – is the Omnipresent Jehovah, would they have left Him, knowing that Jesus is the LORD of Sabbath? The Adonai Jesus entered into the physical covenantal transaction with them when He handed them the bread and the wine – elements of the communion. Do they understand what ‘communion’ means? Moses caught the serpent by its tail, the most dangerous part to hold a live snake of mortiferous venom. This victory of Moses over the serpent proved that as dangerous as Lucifer and his Pharaoh were, they would not overcome the prophet of God. The choice of Moses could not have been a reality without the covenant. Exodus 4:22 “And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the LORD, Israel is my son, even my firstborn:” how did Israel become God’s son? Was it through the biological modus of the Adamic matrix? No, it was through the covenant God entered into with Abraham, the father of faith, faith that alone ignites gregarious rapport between Divinity and His creature, made in His image and likeness. Praise the LORD!Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Covenant Between God And Man (four)

February 4, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
The covenant must be brought to the historicity of Adamic acquiesce. As it was an event in the eternal past of pre-creationism, so must it receive a historical compact between the Author of grace and the Adamic recipient of God’s soteriological beneficence – fulfillment of Scriptural pattern. God had decided to take full responsibility for the creation of Adamic free moral agency. There is a good reason in the heart of the Divinity for the creation of Adam. The historically first sinner, called Lucifer, before God, the eternal Judge, must be brought to judgment. The cup of Luciferian shenaniganry needs to be allowed to become full to its devilish overflow; proving fairness of Divine judgment. God looked into the world and found people whose hearts desire to worship the true God. His Omniscience saw that their sincerity was worthy of trust. The Members of the Godhead could not be wrong, so, man was privileged to enter into covenant of salvation with the gracious I AM THAT I AM. It was of utmost concernment that the I AM Whose existence, before the matrix conceived Abraham, had been in the eternality of the past, must sit in the presence of the Adamic recipient of the covenant for the codification of Luke 22:19-20.Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Covenant Between God And Man (three)

January 31, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Indubitable is the facticity that the Godhead did sit to determine soteriological actuality for Adam, before he is eventually created. It had been agreed between the Father and the Son, not without the acquiescent nod of the Holy Spirit, however. This is why the Church is God’s most phenomenal business venture. Divine security has been established for her – the Bride of Christ. Is the Adamic being not in free moral agency existence? He must be given the opportunity of choice. So, God, no doubt, did ask Adam to be made to fall asleep for Divine surgical operation of taking a rib: a rib to build His Church. It must be the rib by his side for two reasons. The rib looks like the rainbow which stands as the object of the covenant – between God and Noah – of not destroying the world with water again (Genesis 9:13). It must be the rib: for Israel, of which there is no other nation closer to God, is ‘a prince by the side of Jehovah.’ Man, a free moral agent, must be taken into consideration, except you do not understand that free moral agency went into his creation. God, being the Gentleman of eternality, must acknowledge His own terms of creationism. On account of Noah’s free moral agency God did approach him, “Build an ark: for I must preserve you: my expensive treasure.” I wonder where Dr. Abel Damina plucked his idea that, “God never told Noah to build an ark!” To prove that the ark was God’s idea, the Bible records the architectural specifications in Genesis 6:14-18.Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Covenant Between God And Man (two)

January 27, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
From where comes the understanding of Damina’s and Oyakhilome’s didacticism: that “God does not have any covenant with man”? Some verses in this chapter lay credence to the reason for this compact. Berı̂yth shows that God did enter into a compact with Abraham.The circumcision, having an Old Testamentary economy of predominance, is a teacher of the New Testamentary disposition when the circumcision will no longer be of the flesh but very spiritual in that the Holy Spirit’s indwelling of the redeemed Church effects the much better circumcision of the heart. The circumcision, like the rainbow, is the token of compact between God and man: Christians. Covenant and Light have salvific essence, ergo, properly Messianic. There is only one Messiah. Jesus is the Light that lights the life of everyone coming into the world. His Last Supper New Testamentary enactment, definitely, makes the entity of God’s call a person of righteousness in Jesus Christ. Through the Christ God’s covenant with man got an establishment.Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Covenant Between God And Man (one)

January 24, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
I watched two well-known pastors teach on ‘covenant’ and the seated congregation of each auditorium, no doubt, believed, as each pastor taught, “God does not enter into covenant with any man.” Hear one of them, “Rubbish! They’ve lied to you for so long. No Christian is in covenant with God. I’ve thought so, for so long. But, suddenly, in the Scriptures I’ve found that it’s hogwash,” says Dr. Chris Oyakhilome. This man has PHD in theology. If he had struggled with the fact that “no Christian is in covenant relationship with God,” then his doctorate degrees in theology should come under serious scrutiny. This same Oyakhilome taught that it does not constitute a sin for a Christian to smoke cigarette. Of course, there is no documented scriptural legislation against smoking, but we understand that God expects every child of the Divinity to take good care of his health. Any person of Christianity who decides to take a puff of the lighted tobacco does that, definitely, without the joyous consent of the Holy Spirit, Who dwells not in the lungs filled with the nicotine and tar. The Spirit of God dwells in the inner most spirit of the regenerated Christian, but the puff is sacrilege to His occupation of the redeemer’s person. A smoker is evidently suffering from unholy addiction. Will the Holy Spirit lead one to the habit of smoking? Looking at Dr Damina going through eisegetical faux pas, what I see dancing on his mug most times is maniacal enjoyment. Abel Damina is happy spreading biblical didacticism à la esotericism. The kind of people who blatantly engage in eisegetical teachings of the Bible are those under the employment of arcaneness of Satanism.Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , ,

I Will Build My Church (Five)

January 18, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Adam could never have experienced an alien loneliness for many reasons. He was surrounded by a breathtaking environment, a divinely crafted landscaping excellence. The beauty of the sky, the variety of plants and very friendly animals of various sizes of intricate fashioning all held the lord of the earth in sheer captivating wonder to last years. Adam had not even espied the coolness attraction of large yellowed dusky sun. Neither had he gazed enraptured on the millions of twinkles of the night stars and the silver moon; how could he be suffering from boredom, so too soon, when he was not even up to the age of one earthly day? Adam, in the light of Divine plan, was different from what the Church is to offer the LORD God: latria. The Church is a congregation of individuals, whose focus is on which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty, Jesus Christ. If Adam must exemplify Jesus, in whose stead he stood as the lord of the world, he must take on a help meet for him, a wife. Why do you think God rated the completion of Day Six, “very good,” and for other days, “good”? None of the accomplishments of Days One to Five met the excellent requirement of the Church. When it comes to Divine interest, the Church remains His paramount enterprise. Because of this enterprise, God built a house for Himself, Garden of Eden, and put Adam and his wife there to the perfection of the latria on earth. Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I Will Build My Church (Four)

January 15, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
God does not, technically speaking, lose things. Every born again Christian has come back to life eternal, sustained and maintained by the Author of salvation. The enemy will introduce these acts of sinfulness, definitely, but children of God ought to live up to the regenerated life in Christ Jesus. Satan, I have always made it clear, works twenty-five hours everyday; he knows what buttons to press in the mortality of our flesh to cause us to sin against the LORD God. All we need to do is to remember and to use God’s word to counter demonic operatives. Render satanic advancement inoperative by ignoring inordinate fleshly propensities: this is how to mortify our members when Satanism tries to control our emotions. We must mortify our members, not for the reason of keeping our salvation intact, but to prove the essence of our soteriological actuality. The Author of creationism Who also fashioned salvation is the One Who preserves the salvation of mankind. The essential reason for the rapture is to ensure the safety of Christianity when the Antichrist must, as a matter of justice, be allowed to have his day (one week or rather seven years). What is more, it will be unfair to allow the Church of the living God to remain on earth during the seven years, with the turbulence of the second half when Satan’s son must unleash brutality as never seen. The unfairness is that many Christians who know the God they serve and are full of the Holy Spirit will thwart the evil designs of Satanism. Jesus gave Christianity the power that surpasses that of Lucifer. Our steps are ordered by the King of glory, ensuring the words of Romans 16:20.Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I Will Build My Church (Three)

January 11, 2025
by hoojewale
0 Comments
Prophet Isaiah expressly gave the description of beards covered cheeks of the expected Messiah in the vaticination of Isaiah 50:6 “I gave my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to them that plucked off the hair: I hid not my face from shame and spitting.” Is this not a Messianic prophecy Honestly, it is astounding that the General Superintendent of Deeper Life Bible Church majors on holiness and righteousness as if that is the only thing the born again Christian needs. When Jesus made the affirmation, “I will build my Church,” there is an addendum to that asseveration, “and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it;” making it known to all and sundry that the Church He will build will be divinely protected by Him of Whom all things consist. The Church is made up of saved souls of Christianity. There, most certainly, is an unimpeded divine security of salvation. Who can help me reach out to Pastor Kumuyi that the life of Christianity dwells no more in the free moral agency of individual child of the Most High? It has moved into the custody of the Godhead. The Father instituted the call; Jesus covers every Christian in His righteousness, while the Holy Spirit takes eternal abode in the spirit realm of every child of God. This is how serious God treats the soteriology. Three times divinely insured is the zōē the born again Christian exists in. God is the Insurer; He has settled every financial commitment of the insurance; what can go wrong if the LORD God is the faithful One? Nothing! The Church is God’s biggest deal. Will any father allow anything evil happen to any of his one thousand children, especially if that Father has the triune essentiality of Omnipotence, Omniscience and an incredibility of Omnipresence? “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!” These pastors do not understand that if anything should terminate the true salvation of man, Jehovah’s credibility is called to question! Not that it will amount judging God, but, “Why go into a business You cannot successfully consummate?” that will be on the lips of intelligent beings against the LORD God. Read More
born again, Christianity, Doctrinal Issues, Jesus Christ, soteria, The Bible
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
1 2 … 37

H.O Ojewale

Archives