15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0
born again

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (xiii)

0 Comments
Abel Damina’s ignorance will not apprehend the fact that God is a Businessman. The Bible corroborates God’s mind of business. Business languages are employed to teach God’s kingdom reality in Matthew 18:23-35. A similar example is in Matthew 25:14-30. Maybe not to egregiousness of degree, I cannot help discerning dilettantism in Dr Abel Damina’s teaching of the Bible. How can I get it wrong to say that Damina has the traits of an irresolute oscillating dilettante when, with his own mouth he said, “In the bid to pray for people and help more people, I began to teach?” The truthful teachings on Deity of Jesus and of security of salvation and a couple of others, notwithstanding, lots of the things Damina teaches theologically have wiped out the good ones he teaches. Warning against having the mentality of “praying in the name of Jesus,” Damina pointed out that it means that it is Jesus who has a relationship with God and you are not. I want to quote Abel Damina verbatim: “You needed to only come through Jesus once and that’s in salvation. From the moment you come through Jesus once, you and the Father established relationship. You don’t need Jesus anymore. You have a direct access to the Father.” One thing I believe maniacal malcontentment can do is to push Dr Damina to want to think outside the box to teach God’s Word. You cannot think outside the box, as far as the Bible is concerned, to disseminate biblical facticity. Thinking “outside the box” to do exegesis of the Bible is to walk away from the Logos to explicate theological mind of the Godhead. It is diabolical to dot the i’s and cross the t’s of Scripture outside the revealed word of the Bible. Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (xii)

0 Comments
How did Adam become the first prophet, priest, head of the earth and pastor? The LORD God walked to him and gave him the appointments. In Genesis 6:18, God established Noah’s commission with, “But with thee will I establish my covenant.” Abrahamic approval received its indubitability in Genesis 15:17 “And it came to pass, that, when the sun went down, and it was dark, behold a smoking furnace, and a burning lamp that passed between those pieces.” Isaac and Jacob had personal calls of Divinity. Who called out, “Samuel,” when the last Judge, high priest and prophet of Israel was just a kid? Before Jesus began His soteriological ministry, He chose, by calling His apostles into the Lord’s vineyard. But Damina’s entrance into the pastoral business was a stumble of “In the bid to pray for people and help more people, I began to teach.” I thus agree with Joseph Uwana that Damina merely stumbled onto the ministry, very much an uncalled individual by God. No wonder, Dr Abel Damina opens his mouth to teach too much of eisegetical stuffs. I know what argument is very likely to rise from dual suzerainty of the Divinity, “That’s God now!” Good, so let us do more digging of scriptural exegesis. Abraham was a businessman and had a calling into the prophetic office. Before you start to see no comparison, let us look at Moses, who held offices of the Prophet, Judge, Leader and the Priesthood. The spiritual – prophethood and priesthood – and the mundane – Leader and Judge – offices were well merged in one individual Moses. Samuel, of whom it is said, “And all Israel from Dan even to Beersheba knew that Samuel [was] established [to be] a prophet of the LORD” in 1Samuel 3:20; was also the high priest, the leader and the last Judge of Israel, God’s people. As the king of Israel, David held the political post. This same David was a prophet. Solomon ruled as the king, he was also the Preacher in the Book of Ecclesiastes. With these historic facts of God’s Book, what stops Reverend Chris Okotie and Pastor Tunde Bakare from running for the presidency of Nigeria? Absolutely nothing stops them: from the word of God. Amen!Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (xi)

0 Comments
Damina says that Jesus did not perform the ascension; that He entered the disciples and not the throne of heaven. To validate that unholy doctrine, he must disagree with Christ’s Second Coming. The Second Coming has Old Testament validation. He teaches that no preacher of the gospel should delve into political partisanship. Let me start with his eye opening Andrew Wommack. Wommack does not believe in the rapture of Christianity. Damina prefers to read other printed materials in the dissemination of the gospel of Jesus. What an irony! I do have my Christian Brother, Joseph Uwana, to thank for intimating me with this information about Dr Abel Damina and even letting me have the internet link to the video. It truly behooves Christian people to intimate the teachings they do not agree with, to other Christians to enable Scriptural facts to be made readily available, especially, for those not nursing itchy ears. Abel Damina, from the interview he granted, showed that the simplicity of the gospel was not enough. He wanted to outdo divine authorship of the Scriptures. This is exactly what Lucifer concocted resulting in roguery of Satanism: trying to equal Jehovah in his own terms is the bane of Luciferian loss of celestial estate. It is egregious puerility for Damina worrying himself sick thinking, “Is Church all about giving and taking.”It is just as trying to make me believe that Adam began to experience loneliness on the very sixth day of his creation when he was yet to explore the entire global landscape, the waters, the cosmic intricacies plus the vastness of the belly of our earth. The Bible contains sermocination and revelations of eternal magnitude. How many teachings had he done to think he had covered the vastness of Scriptural documentation? Lucifer tempted Dr Damina with the itch. Damina fell for it. Satanism struck him with demonic restlessness; Damina succumbed. Under the spell of deception, he was goaded through an uncanny desire to spread extra-biblical eisegesis.Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (x)

0 Comments
Celestial drama unfolded in Revelation chapter 5 proving distinction of the Persons of the Godhead. Waited, God did to make sure that no intelligent being of creationism will dare come forward to take the scroll from His Divine hand. Then strolled Jesus, in all the magnificence of Deity, and did what none could ever do. Christ stretched His own hand of eternality to take from the hand of the Ancient of days – it takes the hand of eternality to take and to open what the Eternal Father holds. Amen. In the Godhead dwells the mystery of the three distinct Persons of creationism. When one believes he has his congregation firmly under the control of his thumb, he continues to look for more dominant ways. Damina does not agree with the Bible, saying, “Jesus is not the Lion of Judah.”How can this man just not acknowledge the metaphorical allusion at literary play here? Even if a simile is employed in this regard, does it make Jesus an unruly beast of jungle? Rather than enjoy the metaphor, Dr Damina chose to read an unnecessary malapropism to glorify his habitual eisegetical approach to Scripture. Scripture, as we understand, must explain scriptural mind of theology. So, how does Scripture support Scripture in this case? Let us take a critical look at Damina’s claim that, “Abraham was a dubious businessman;” he did not stop there; he went on to malign the character of Abraham’s grandson, saying, “Jacob too used Benjamin as collateral to make money.”How does one explain Damina’s rationale behind teaching that Abraham proved to be a dubious man, sourcing his Bible text from Genesis chapters 12 and 20; involving Pharaoh of Egypt and Abimelech of Gerar respectively? Contrary to Damina’s cautioning to be silent when the Bible is silent and be loud when the Bible so is, Damina is outrageously loud where there is no biblical authorization.Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (ix)

0 Comments
Damina is categorical in saying that you do not have another spirit other than the Holy Spirit. Which spirit in the inner being of the Christian, of this verse, is Paul, the Apostle, offering prayers for preservation and blamelessness unto the LORD’s coming? It definitely cannot be the Holy Spirit of God – needing no prayer, being of the Godhead – Who appeared on the day of Pentecost as Jesus had promised and gained spiritual entrance into them to empower them in the Kingdom of God business. Again, Damina, you are totally wrong. Dr Abel Damina does not believe in the Trinity of the Godhead. “There is only one God,” taking his teaching from Deuteronomy 6:4, concerning the Trinity, he became dramatic, saying, “What about Trinity? One! What about Father, Son and the Holy Spirit? One!” and continuing, “If He is the Almighty, He can be anything He wants to be so, when He becomes the Son, He’s still the Father; when He becomes the Holy Spirit, He’s still the Person. It’s just that in His sufficiency, He can be whatever He wants to be and for how long and for whatever purpose He desires. It is out of Him the Father came, it is out of Him the Son came, it is out of Him the Holy Spirit came and He can decide to make them nonexistent if He chooses to. He became all of that for the purpose of redemption.” I have quoted this man verbatim! . The subtlety of Damina’s demonic effusion says in categorical language that God can decide to throw the Messiah of the soteriology into oblivion and also hurl the Holy Spirit and the Eternal Father into extinction. If this is not madness borne out of Satanism, what is it? How did this theological “oneness” come into being? This ‘oneness’ teaching of Jehovah stinks of the incommodiousness of Sabellianism. The heresy of modalism has been around since 217-220 AD. It is a propounding of Sabellius of Rome. It is also called modalistic monarchianism or Modalism which asserts that God exists as one Person who shifts between three faces: one for the Father, one for the Son, and one for the Holy Spirit.Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (viii)

0 Comments
“God has never been angry,” taught Dr Abel. He shot his didactic feet for maintaining, “Anger is strange to God. God has never been angry before. He is not angry now; and He will never be angry.” Damina why are you so bent on prevarication of God’s Bible? Genesis 6:6 “And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.” The contrariness of Damina’s mind said, “God has never been angry.” Abraham said to the LORD God in His preincarnation manifestation of Genesis 18:24 “Peradventure there be fifty righteous within the city: wilt thou also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are therein?” Damina, why, tell me, will God destroy the lives of two big nations if not out of anger? In Exodus 4:24-26, God would have killed Gershom, the son of Moses and Zipporah, his wife, for not abiding by the covenant of the circumcision. Concerning God’s anger, these are the lyrics of the psalmist: “Who knoweth the power of thine anger? Even according to thy fear, so is thy wrath” (Psalm 90:11). It also says, “Thou, even thou, art to be feared: and who may stand in thy sight when once thou art angry” (Psalm 76:7)? What does it mean by “For our God is a consuming fire” that we read in Hebrews 12:29? It is a warning to those who, with lackadaisical attitude, treat the gospel of redemption with levity.Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (vii)

0 Comments
This is an unedited statement of Dr Abel Damina: “If you follow the Bible you will be poor all your life.” As if that was not damning enough he went on, “This is the reason why Christians are the poorest people on earth.” It is the political title of the soon coming King, Jesus Christ, Who will rule for one whole thousand years on this very earth. That He will rule for one thousand earthly years is another Scriptural fact Damina jettisons, believing that Jesus is not coming back again. Why is He Jehovah Tsabbaoth? The true empyrean hosts or armies are His creation (Genesis 2:1). He is none other than the LORD of hosts in 1Samuel 1:3. The LORD Jesus is the Head of the Church. So, tell me something here. Where will I go when I need to have whatever need confronts me; is it not Jesus? Where two or three are gathered in His name to raise holy hands to the Most High, is it not the Church? The Church, I have come to understand, is the one stop shop for all spiritual needs. The one against our happiness, Satan, is a spiritual evil being, whose abode is outside the Church. Where does Abel Damina tell his congregation to seek wealth? He said categorically, “If you want to make money, go outside the Church.” And that is what any great motivational speaker will teach you. If God will bless us in His capacity as the “LORD of hosts” does it not show everyone that He is going to war on our behalf to provide for those of us who seek wealth through the Church protocol? The great wealth of money Abel Damina wields is, definitely, not from the One Whose ownership is the cattle on thousands of hills, because it is acquired outside the Church of Jehovah Shammah. Selah!Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (vi)

0 Comments
Now let us look at the word ‘covenant’; it is the Hebrew berı̂yth (ber-eeth’) meaning: '1. alliance, pledge, agreement (man to man) or between God and man. 2. (in the sense of cutting) a compact (because made by passing between pieces of flesh).’ Again God told Noah who led Adamic creatures from the antediluvian age to the postdiluvian era, “And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you” (Genesis 9:9); and the said seed after him are his Adamic progenies. And when Divine scrutiny found Abraham trustworthy, the Mosaic account, as God revealed to him in Genesis 17:1-5 reads, 1) “And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the LORD appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the Almighty God; walk before me, and be thou perfect. 2) And I will make my covenant between me and thee, and will multiply thee exceedingly. 3) And Abram fell on his face: and God talked with him, saying, 4) As for me, behold, my covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations. 5) Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee.” What Bible do these people (Abel Damina and Chris Oyakhilome) read? They teach that God never had any covenant with man. God being the Keeper of covenant, He must show Himself to the last of the three patriarchs of Israel to validate the personal covenant He had entered with man; and Jacob woke up from his sleep; holding the patriarchal baton of the covenant between God and man. Amen!Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (v)

0 Comments
God did not just think of the ark as a means of Noachian salvation, He was the Architectural Engineer of the ark. What He had purposed to do long before the creation of any intelligent being, the LORD God instructed Noah to do. God did, truly, tell Noah to build the ark. Let me quote Damina to see whether his teaching agrees with the above revealed Mosaic Book, “God didn’t tell Noah to build an ark. It was Noah who decided to build an ark as a means of communicating what God revealed to him.” The spirit of deceitfulness dwells, of sooth, dangerously, in the heart of Abel Damina. Do not be Damina-swayed, be warned. I, honestly, do not see the rationale behind Damina’s teaching that has the topic: “Tithing is not for the New Testament Church.” Who was the first person to decide, from his heart, to tithe his possession? It was Abraham. Was Abrahamic tithe triggered by divine law of the Old Testamentary economy? No, it was not. Two forces I know are responsible for Adamic resolve: the force of Good and the force of Satanism. Was it the gentle whisper of Satanism that prompted Abraham’s offer of the first ever tithing or was it inspired by the Spirit of God? That this man could muster up a wicked boldacity without a bit of conscience twist, teaching that, “God never entered into covenant with man,” is a diabolical deviation from scriptural facticity. Actually, Dr Damina does have an eisegetical ally in the pastoral faux pas of Dr Chris Oyakhilome.Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (iv)

0 Comments
Damina, you cannot rewrite or edit the Bible. I want to believe that Abel Damina is one of the preachers who do not believe in the rapture; the best thing he can do is to make nonsense of any verse of the Bible that stands in his eisegetical crave. The Bible does not give the slightest hint of the angels’ scriptural ignorance. Have I not heard you, Damina, saying, “When the Scripture is loud, be loud; but where the Bible is silent, be silent?” Abel Damina is shunning ethical standards of scriptural didacticism just to teach scriptural anomalies. The Bible says Jesus parted from them heavenward into the clouds; is that not ascension? Is Damina not today’s Cerintus? Damina has, definitely, come to steal, kill and to destroy the truth of the gospel, and so unfortunately, he has teeming like-minded people in their millions, probably. Is it not true that billions of followership does not necessarily translate to living in the veracity of the revealed Word of God? There are more in the camp of Satanism than in the Church of the Living God.Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (iii)

0 Comments
Is there any smidgeon of reason why God will ever choose to lie? He has nothing untoward to hide. Jehovah is the absolute Truth. In Him is found not deceit. His inability to lie will cause whatever He says to be true! What is viewed as His incapability to lie underscores the strength of His Almighty character. Rather than effect an opening of vista of His weakness, the impossibility of His lying stance breadthens the LORD God’s incorruptibility. Because God cannot lie, this demonstrates His Fatherhood of lights, with Whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning (James 1:17). The lying heart definitely belongs to a vacillatory idiot. The scriptural rectitude agrees with Pastor Damina and other pastors that what God cannot do does exist. Because God cannot lie He, most definitely, cannot commit any sin. Sinfulness dwells in the midst of antagonism against the express word of God. And this is the very reason why God cannot commit any sin: He will never go against His Word. His Word, Jesus Christ, is the Truth. Dr Abel Damina teaches that “Jesus did not ascend to heaven.” Let us look at some of his arguments for this teaching: i. After His resurrection, Jesus was purely immaterial, therefore, He could change to whatever He wanted or even disappear. ii. It was an angel who spoke the words of Acts 1:11; an angel who did not know much: according to Abel Damina, he maintains that what the angel told the disciples has no scriptural corroboration.Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (ii)

0 Comments
Very few preachers teach the security of salvation, so, when I heard that Dr Abel Damina teaches ‘once saved, always saved', it pleased my heart. If there are architectural buildings of enclosures in heaven, then God too has His own abode of walls and roofing. To put a roof on God’s dwelling is to limit His personage and tends to impugn Jehovah’s immanency and also makes Him look like needing protection, ergo, heretic and in nonconformity with Christian theology. From the definitions above, a paraphrastic couch of the promise of Jesus is, “In my Father’s home (family) are many spaces….I go to prepare a spot for you.” I can understand the mortality claim of being the Alpha i.e. first or beginning. But, when the selfsame entity lays claim to being the Omega i.e. last or ending as well, that is the same as laying claim to eternality of existence. Only God is Alpha and Omega at the same time. The epithetical which is, and which was, and which is to come speaks of the Entity predating eternity past, Who still exists, and will, by His own power, continue to exist as the LORD God throughout eternity to come. What is the last name Jesus calls Himself in the above verse? “The Almighty,” which in Greek is pantokratōr (pan-tok-rat’-ore): ‘he who holds sway over all things; the ruler of all: God the all ruling, that is, God (as absolute and universal sovereign).’Read More

Who Is Abel Damina Working For? (i)

0 Comments
A neighborhood acquaintance, wondering about the kind of teachings Dr. Abel Damina is known for, quoted what he watched and heard him saying, “Anytime I drop something about the Bible, and they busy themselves with it, I quickly go back to do some research and drop another bomb at them.” Let us go through some of Dr Abel Damina’s teachings: 1. You cannot lose your salvation. 2. There are no mansions in heaven. 3. Jesus is God. 4. The falsehood of “What God cannot do does not exist.” 5. Jesus did not ascend to heaven. 6. God did not tell Noah to build an ark. 7. Tithing is not for the New Testament Church. 8. God never entered into covenant with man. 9. If you follow the Bible, you will be poor all your life. 10. God has never been angry. 11. You do not have a separate spirit of your own. The spirit inside you is the Holy Spirit; because you and God are one. 12. There is no Trinity. 13. Jesus is not the Lion of Judah. 14. Abraham was a dubious businessman; Jacob too used Benjamin as collateral to make money. Philippians 3:9 “And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:” therefore, the righteousness of the Christian dwells not in himself. Can Jesus lose His divine righteousness? If the answer is, “No,” then as a Christian, I cannot lose my righteousness, and, consequently, my salvation. Selah!Read More

The Lion of Judah (Three)

0 Comments
Eternality of the Son took from the Eternal hand of God the Father (…continues from part II…) 3)            The dramatic walk towards the throne were the strides of eternal feet of the Second Member of the Godhead. The outstretched hand of the Lion of Judah was the arm of eternality of the Son: for only...Read More

The Lion of Judah (Two)

0 Comments
The sole aim of the Incarnation is purely soteriological. He came to save the lost souls of Adam, made in the image and likeness of Himself. Having overcome the world for the Church, who dares stand up to Christ, the Lion of Judah? You know, one head of a purported Church of Jesus taught that that Elder, whose seat is one of those that surround the throne of the Eternal Father, does not know Bible, which, according to this pastor, Dr. Abel Damina, accounts for his utterance of “Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.” The simple question to this pastor is, “Could a celestial Elder, seated on a throne in front of the thrice holy Jehovah open his mouth to vomit unscriptural rubbish?” Do we not understand that: one, it was his encounter with the LORD Jesus on the island of Patmos that got John transported, in spirit, to see heaven? Two, was it not the Holy Spirit that inspired the writing of Revelation, the last Book of the Bible? Number three, was John so much an abecedarian when it comes to facticity of Scriptural relevance? The Elder was not rebuked for his supposedly careless contribution: which proves that he was perfectly correct to refer to Jesus as “the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David,” Who, according to Scripture, “hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.” Many teachers of the Bible are mere tools of Satanism, come to scratch the syndromic itchy ears of Church goers who are not ready to abide by the simplicity of Scripture. The Father on the throne is not the Lion of the tribe of Judah, neither is the Holy Spirit is: for neither of Them did the practicality of becoming the flesh of Adamic existence. Does this epic celestial phenomenality not debunk theological oneness theory of Sabellianism which Dr. Abel Damina teaches: that there are no distinctive personalities among the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit? Read More

The Lion of Judah (One)

0 Comments
What the abecedarian in Scriptural understanding apprehends is the negativity attached to polar and not the charging workability involvement of polarity. It takes nonpareil power to enable workability of amalgamation the of two opposite offices. For the soteriological sake of Adam’s regeneration, is there any thing too hard for God’s achievement? This Lamby phenomenon, a foregone conclusion in the Godhead calendar, must come into place the minute the original sin waded ominously into the Eden Garden. Twice the Lamby prospect received its citadel of institutionalism on the terra firma. Cain’s unfortunate, spiritual rejection was Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God, that takes away the sin of the world. This Lamb had been slain before the foundation of the world. Christ must stoop low to assume the humble posture of the prophet unknown to His people whom He had come to save. For the sake of salvation, Jesus became the Lamb for the substitutionary death: the Just for the unjust. Selah! Pastor Adeboye's eulogy of God, saying, “God is the One Who carries out clinical surgery without dropping blood,” contextually, is anomalous with the Scripture. It was inevitable cruciality for blood to drop. Adam’s untainted blood must be deposited before the occurrence of the original sin. Adam’s prefiguration of Jesus, the Husband of the Church, must go through the process of following the Scriptural pattern of blood shedding of the establishment of the Church: which the Woman of Eden represents in Scripture. Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (XII)

0 Comments
Any born again Christian who does not exercise faith to receive this divine gift misses out in this rapturous elevation. Most definitely, things will be revealed to you; things most fail to see concerning the facticity of Scripture. Is it not a thing of pride that you are having a phone conversation with the most powerful head of government? How lowly the pride goes when the conversation is with the Most High Jehovah, the Creator Himself? Apostle Joshua Selma is quite obsessed with spiritual power such that he will do anything no matter how Scriptural anomalous it stands. In one of his spiritual excursions he, together with other insincere church leaders, went to visit the tomb of William Marrion Branham – one of the greatest evangelists of our time – and received an impartation of spiritual power from the Holy Spirit by touching the dead man’s tomb! What does this mean? I will tell you what it insinuates. The tombs of Archbishop Idahosa, Moses Orimolade, S.B.J. Oshoffa, Joseph Ayo Babalola, Prophet T.B. Joshua, Olumba Olumba Obu, Pope Leo I, Smith Wigglesworth, Kathryn Kuhlman, Kenneth E. Hagin, Reinhard Bonnke and many others must receive visitations from Christians who crave idolatrous version of spiritual harvests of Holy Spirit’s impartation. Apostle Joshua Selma picked leaves and petals from the grave side of Branham’s tomb, took them home, mixed them thoroughly in unguents and bottled them for sale. To those who will buy his apothecary jars and bottles, they believe, unfortunately, will constantly be dealing supernaturally with the Holy Spirit, Jesus Christ and, of course, make approachable the eternal Father, Whose divine brightness is unapproachable. My philosophical rumination taught me, as a teenager, that Lucifer should be as powerful as Jehovah to go against the LORD God – he is still roaming about in his acts of Satanism – and nothing seems to dislodge the status quo. But having understood the word of God, I know that belief is a mere rationalism of fallen carnality of Adamic propensity. Lucifer fell, becoming an exact opposite of good; the truth, of course, is that his evil power is an infinitesimal lowness compared to the Creator. Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (XI)

0 Comments
Apostle Peter was not infallible as this incident shows; so, how can the Pope of Catholicism ascribe infallibility to the carnality of his existence and his ipseity? The same Roman Catholic Church added an unscriptural prayer for the dead, ostensibly, to create avenue of wealth for the Catholic Church. What scriptural wisdom lies in “May his soul rest in peace” when one comes to the understanding of Hebrews 9:27 “And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:” which the Pope together with Catholicism is too impervious to acknowledge. Roman Catholic Church also embarked on the promulgation of 1190 A.D. It is: “The sale of indulgences, commonly regarded as a purchase of forgiveness and a permit to indulge in sin. It can also be purchased on behalf of a dead loved one.” Roman Catholic Church cannot be trusted. I have always found it so unbelievable listening to professed Christians solemnly petitioning, “May his soul rest in peace,” in prayer to God when someone dies. Honestly, you cannot be a knowledgeable person of Christianity to offer such scriptural anomaly. Do these Church going people know the origin of this rampant gaucherie? In the year 310, well over a thousand ago, the Roman Catholic Church institutionalised: “Prayers for the dead and the sign of the cross.” Speaking in tongues is the evidence of the new birth in Christ Jesus. If you are God’s child, should you not have a language just for the two of you? 1Corinthians 14:2 “For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.”Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (X)

0 Comments
I, honestly, did not know whether I should laugh or pity Dr. Damina watching the video as he taught that the elder, seated on one of the twenty-four celestial thrones, forming an ark round the throne of God the Father, did not know the word of God because he described Jesus as the Lion of Judah. Damina just opens his mouth and allows anything that feels like dropping out of his mouth have its way through. Dr. Damina would not agree with the epithetical Lion of the Tribe of Judah. He teaches that because the lion is a beast, therefore, it cannot be applied to Jesus Christ, the Saviour. Is Damina the Apostle John who wrote The Book of Revelation? Do you know what is funny? He said, “Jesus is the Lamb of God, not a lion.” Hear his argument, “How can Jesus be a lamb and a lion at the same time? It doesn’t make sense.” So, you see, Damina does not teach the Bible according to the revealed Word; he prefers to teach God’s word according to what he feels based on logical reasoning of Adamic fashioning. This is what eisegesis or isogesis is all about. Maybe Jacob, the father of Israel, was struggling with caducity when he prophesied concerning Judah in Genesis 49:9-10. Damina’s system of sermocination is likened, in all wise, to the way of rap music. You see, when they began to punctuate the music industry with rap, I said to myself, “Man, a fallen creature, has begun to talk.” The rhythmic captivity and the pulsating strength that run underground the rap genre give beauty to it. But when you pay attention to the lyrical rendition, it is nothing short of the vagrant stray, both to the left and right of Divine warning. Rap publishes prevailing ills of society; good. Are their lyrics not laced with vulgarism of Satanism? Most of today’s supposedly teaches of the Bible are mere motivational speakers, devoid of the kennel of the kerygma. The rap music is a societal pollution; so are the biblical teachings of Dr. Abel Damina. Apostle Michael Orokpo gave a teaching on Zion and said this in conclusion, “This is why some of you will go to heaven and yet will not see Jesus for eternity.” This teaching does not string any connection to the revealed Scripture. I do not know what arcane version of the Bible Oropko studies for his apostolic didacticism. What is the meaning of Zion? It is defined as ‘parched land, sunny mountain and by extension – probably from its height – a fortress, hence, divinely fortified people of the Most High.’ Zion of heaven is the assemblage of the redeemed saints of Jesus, or the Born Again Christians. Michael Oropko maintains that the celestial Zion is a place for only those who practised Christianity well enough to receive rewards in heaven. Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (IX)

0 Comments
Damina, unfortunately, had to mention names of prominent rich people who have nothing to do with the Church of the Living God, to prove that the Church cannot make anybody rich. Definitely, Dr. Damina did not acquire his riches through the blessing of the Author of the Church. You know what Damina said, “If you want to make money, go outside the Church.” Unbelievable, you must agree. Damina said that Solomon did not have to ask God for money because kings are always rich, especially, with David as his father. If Solomon had depended on the treasure left by David, for the building of the Jerusalem Temple, it would not have been Solomonic grand. Is it not good that Damina will spill out from his pastoral mind that Solomon was already rich and did not need to ask for what he already had, which is quite logical. But it is very wise to place logicality side by the side theological flawlessness to arrive safely at the true mind of God. Damina, what is really wrong with your reasoning? Are you absolutely sold to the enemy of Scripture? Let us look at what many people do not seem to see. Why would God say to Solomon, “And I have also given thee that which thou hast not asked, both riches, and honour: so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days;” if Solomon had all the riches he needed? Is God verbose? Is God not the absolute Economist when it comes to word usage? Does the last sentence of 1Kings 3:13 not expressly say from God’s holy mouth, “so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days”? King Solomon was not this rich. Damina’s warped mind of Sabellianism does not know this simple fact. His thoughts are far from the Most High Jehovah. Damina’s insistence that, “go outside the Church to make money,” is terribly flawed. Satanism has perfectly bewitched you, Abel Damina, to the point of absolute beguilement! Eden Garden is God’s House, which is not different from the Church. Rivers that flowed out of Eden is laden with riches. In Eden the LORD God visited them every cool of the evening. Eden is the first Church; riches flowed from Eden (Genesis 2:10-12). Does Jesus promise John 14:14, “If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it”? Why should we go to Church, ask Jesus of riches, and it will amount to theological faux pas? The Church is one stop shop for all needs of Adamic creatures; with faith that is solely based on the revealed word of God.Read More