15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0
Catholicism

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (XII)

5 Comments
Ascension of Mary, where in the Old or the New Testament does it boast of a biblical record? It is merely of unscriptural Catholicism. Did Joseph, her husband, go through the same physical ascension as well? I guess not! Selah! Creationism embroidered in every intelligent being, a heart of adoratory predisposition. Docility, engendered by the original sin, man would prostrate in worship of what ignites his religious fancy. Catholicism, laden with speciosity of Scripture, has successfully wrapped her adherents in the straitjacket of religion. Honestly, no sophistry is required to inculcate John 3:3. You want to know what establishes the enforcement of Mariolatry? This is it. In the eighth century, the second council of Nicea decreed that the image of God was as proper an object of worship as God Himself. If you truly love God, will you obey or disobey His express mand? Selah! Read More

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (XI)

3 Comments
"Hail Mary" apotheosizes a humble, Jesus worshipping Mary! "Hail Mary" is a 'Systematic Theotokos' contraption of Catholicism: an unbiblical Mariology. Its sole bourne is Mariolatry! Truth be told, Mariolatry is anthropolatry! If Catholics should argue that Mariology is not Mariolatry, then why do the Catholic faithfuls kneel before the statue of Mary in prayer? A billion and two hundred million die-hard adherence fail to see the intrinsic shame of Mariology when we understand that the Church happens to be the pillar and the ground of Jesus' truth! Selah!Read More

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (X)

0 Comments
Another story says Catholic Mary exposed her breast to Saint Bernard, and shot milk into his eye. Presently, people say, while receiving milk from the heavenly Mother, Saint Bernard was initiated into supreme consciousness and adopted as the son of God and Mary. The more medieval wording was that Mary filled him with all divine graces and purified all his sins. Did Mary have to die to perform such deeds of divinity? There is not one scriptural record of Mary’s power of initiation into any ecumenical assistance. The Jerusalem Church did not pray to the Madonna. Mary did not utter one word of prophecy or an encouragement to the nascent Church during the Upper Room inauguration. It was Peter who spoke, having been reinstated as an Apostle of the expected Church. Where was Mary at the first ever Church Council of Jerusalem, found in The Book of Acts Of Apostles 15:1-21, to iron out the Church doctrine? It was James, the biological brother of Jesus and the pastor of the Jerusalem Church who made the final ecumenical speech. None heard of Mary. Read More

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (IX)

0 Comments
It expressly and categorically states: 'one God;' 'one mediator' and not any other cardinal number. Catholicism fails, in its bid to satiate its unGodly crave, to perceive the dangerous scriptural anomaly this verse makes of the mediatrix didacticism. If the Bible says, one mediator, and Catholicism establishes another mediatrix, is the church of Papal Rome not changing the word of God to read: "...there is one God, and TWO Mediators between God and men,"? Are there any private interpretation of scripture? "Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation," of 2Peter 1:20, is the answer. A good look at the paintings sponsored by Catholicism are quite Nimro-Semiramic. Haloes, triangles, Madonna, cupids and most prominently, mother and child. To keep Semiramis, the moon goddess latreutically alive, the baby Jesus of Catholicism must not be weaned!Read More

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (VIII)

0 Comments
Will it, in a way, be a ratiocinative superfluity delving into an acquiescence to the 4th century orthodoxy established theotokos (bearer of God) of Mariological title? True rationality will lead to the facticity that Mary's matrix did containerised the physical reality of the Incarnation on our terra firma. On account of this fact, yes, it is, to theotokos. But since it is pellucid enough that that which is being given birth to is actually coming into existence for the first time, the darkness of Mariological beam leading to 'mother of God' insistent hue is a non-issue. An aberrant Mariology. His preincarnate manifestations on the terra firma abound in the annals of the pages of Scripture. Having been before creationism makes Him as eternal as His Father. It is quite impossible to procreate the Self-Existing Jehovah, the Eternal One.Read More

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (VII)

0 Comments
Is there any infinitesimal inference to Marian maternity of God in Simon Peter's Holy Spirit's inspired scriptural transcriptions? A mother will always be older than her progeny even if she dies at age fifty and her son goes on to clock the hundredth year in his own life time. No wonder Goddess Madonna continues to clutch on to Baby God! She is older than the Ancient of days! That, Pope Francis (if you care to know), is the implications of your Christokos! Your false declarations make Mary the mother of the One who has neither beginning nor ending. Had your Madonna been before the beginlessness of the Ancient of days? Does she have the capacity of eternity to containerise the Self-Existing, Eternal, Holy One of Israel? Impossible!Read More

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (V)

0 Comments
In the year 1198, Catholicism gave Mary the titles: co-redemptrix, advocate, auxiliatrix, adjutrix, mediatrix, believing that as the mother of Christ, she should share in His official responsibilities. I have a question? Who decides who shares in divine attributes, man or the Divinity? Do we call this ecumenical decision an acute scriptural indigence on the part of Catholicism or a blatant gibe at Scripture? Do we not know whose job it is to distribute ecumenical offices in Acts 13:2 “As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, the Holy Ghost said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them?”Read More

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (IV)

0 Comments
Marian epithets of Catholicism were never handed down to Catholic fathers. These epithetic Mariolatry are the scriptural paradoxicalities of Romish rumination. They are not Pauline, Peterine or Johannine. They have no backing of the twelve-pillared Apostolic offices of the upper-room event (ten days after Christ’s ascension) of nascent Church. They crept in from outside the Church of the Living Jesus. It probably began with St. Irenaeus of Lyons, in the second century A.D. He called Mary the "second Eve" because through Mary and her willing acceptance of God's choice, God undid the harm that was done through Eve's choice to eat the forbidden fruit.Read More

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (III)

0 Comments
One of the scriptural bizarreness of Catholicism is the cultic mother-and-child established indoctrination. Quite a paganistic occultism. This is a Nimrodic (or Nimro-semiramic) importation of paganism into the Church of Jesus. Nowhere in Scripture is it (mother-and-child) found. This is an apodeictic representation of Nimrodic Baal worship of his wife, Semiramis, and Tammuz their son, whose deified stance concludes the apish trinitarian concept of Baalism. Satanism conspiracy took it from Babel to Egypt, the next global world power. There, in Egypt, the mother and child assumed the sobriquet of Isis and Horus. Is it not over two thousand years ago? How could the baby Jesus still remain a baby? Catholicism should tell me, in fact, us, when that baby of Madonna will be weaned! Read More

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (II)

0 Comments
Luke 1:46, 47 “And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord, 47) And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.” Mary’s admittance of needing a Saviour is an indication of her spiritual indigence. How could God’s own mother crave for a soteriological stance? Whoever seeks for divine salvation must be a sinner. “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” [Romans 3:23]; Mary, the natural biological daughter of Heli, was born a sinner. I hope the past Popes, and especially the extant Pope Frances is not unaware of the scriptural facticity of Mary’s sinful birth, ergo, cannot be God’s Mother and consequently a Goddess!Read More

CATHOLICISM AND MARY (I)

4 Comments
Could Mary have given birth to Christ, God the Son? One can only beget a one coming into the existence of creationism for the first time. Of truth is the fact that there is nothing too hard for the LORD to do. But it is also a crystal pellucidity that it will amount to spiritual incongruity for a creature to beget the Author of creationism. The simple fact is that the begotten is actually coming into existence for the first time. If Mary did beget the Ancient of days then she was nothing less than a Goddess (with capital 'G'): for Jehovah's deity is of the true living God. Should Mary be a Goddess the Apostolic ink would have had it couched in God's protocol. Christ's eternal being would have ceased. He would have to be brought under a new beginning of existence. Read More

THE TRUTH OF ALL TRUTHS (IV)

0 Comments
The epithetic stance of 'I am' stems from its definition. It is the Septuagint rendition of ego eime, which is the same as the revelation of God's name -I AM or Jehovah. This is the facticity of the person of Jesus -the ‘I AM’ of the New Testament. It will be a usurpative act on His part to institute a new covenant had He not been the Initiator of the new: "For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins" [Matthew 26:28].Read More

LUCIFER’S DESIDERATION: God of gods (2)

0 Comments
Purgatory. Just why this unscriptural indoctrination of purgatory when the Bible unequivocally teaches, "Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God" [John 3:3]? Baby Jesus must be tied to Mary, mother of God, queen of the saints, queen of the angels or much better still "queen of heaven!" (Jeremiah 44:17). Will this baby (Jesus) never be weaned? John saw Him on the island of Patmos and what does the Bible record? Revelation 1:17 reads, "And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last:" This is Jesus, the Jehovah of Israel!Read More

ARE THERE MORE CHRISTIANS THAN OTHER BELIEVERS? (Part One)

0 Comments
In the Book of Luke 18:8, Jesus rhetorically asked, "...Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth? This is an indictment on mankind; the only ingredient He needed to accept an earthling spiritually into His Kingdom, faith, will be lacking.Read More

THE STAR AND THE CRESCENT (part two)

0 Comments
The image of the star and the crescent came to my mind and in a flash, while in a Church service, and I saw it. The star is the sun (Nimrod, all over again) and the crescent is none other than the moon goddess Semiramis! Allah, etymologically, is of two: al (the) and illahu (generic word for god) words. Allah, the god, is, therefore, quite different from the Christian God, Jehovah.Read More

THE STAR AND THE CRESCENT (part one)

0 Comments
Why is the star and the crescent so religiously prominent? Every star, elementary science will teach you, is another sun! The crescent is actually the fullness of the moon as the days roll by.Read More

An Ambassador (For Christ or Lucifer) – Conclusion.

0 Comments
It is clear that Olumba Olumba Obu, who declared himself to be the Holy Spirit, is dead. His son and successor, Roland Obu, who or what is he? The Christ or God the Father? Read More

An Ambassador (For Christ or Lucifer) -2nd part

0 Comments
“Vicar of Christ” makes the pope Christ (as coming from the Father) or the Holy Spirit (the Comforter). This guy is calling himself God, the Creator, just as others before him! He claims the ability to speak ex cathedra, which implies that the pope exercises a Godlike infallibility which enables him to add to and augment Scripture.Read More

An Ambassador (For Christ or Lucifer) (1st part)

0 Comments
Those who display divergent, scriptural doctrines run ambassadorial errand for Lucifer, the fallen angel who must receive obeisant adoration. They do not think, enter or keep the gate of the gospel of Jesus. Roman Catholic has consistently proved to be incorrigible in her stubborn exegesis of unscriptural doctrines.Read More

THE SANCTUARY INCURSION (part four)

0 Comments
The Romish Church opened the door too wide for evil incursion. Is the Vatican Church of Jesus? I doubt it! Last year, around the middle of 2015, Pope Francis spoke ex cathedra (i.e. infallibly as Jesus Christ would), telling the world that God had placed on his papal shoulders of the need to modify the Ten Commandments.Read More