15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0
Abel Damina

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (VII)

0 Comments
A sizeable number of them are of the ecclesiastical office of Prophets, claiming to hear directly from God, things the Bible is very silent about – which should not be taught. Many pride themselves with apostolic office, which is acquired from the apostles under whom they served. What does that mean? A self-styled Apostle is seen appointing another as an Apostle. Preposterous! There is no kingdom that does not engage in seriousness of economics. The Kingdom of God, run by the Church cannot be an exception. How can one give offerings if one is absolutely broke? Can a jobless person gather from nothing to give tithes? Why would Paul say, “But my God shall supply?” The conjunctional use of “but” makes the providential supply contingent on Paul’s reception of what church members give to him. Sowing and reaping, in faith, is what the Church economy is all about (2Corinthians 9:6-11). Two of the ways of giving to the Church in fulfillment of Pauline Philippians 4:15-19 is tithes and offering. Malachi 3:10 is Divine legality for prosperity activation in the Kingdom of Jehovah: “if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing, that there shall not be room enough to receive it.” If Damina teaches that the Bible is a poor material for money making, is this eisegesis or exegesis, considering the Bible verses I have treated so far? And if Damina should insist that Malachi 3:10 is of Old Testamentary order of Divine economy, Damina should show the world where God said so in the Holy Writ. Where the Bible is silent on any subject, we cannot, from our understanding, teach the same. It simply amounts to eisegetical stray of Satanism. Disheartening, it is, to know that someone who claims to be a Bible teacher will resort to tarnishing the image of Abraham, calling him a wicked businessman. Has Damina not gone round the bend? Where is the incongruity here? Genesis chapter 12 proves Damina’s incongruous handling of Scripture, concerning Abraham. So, let us go there to attest to Damina’s eisegetical inordinateness.Read More

Covenant Between God And Man (three)

0 Comments
Indubitable is the facticity that the Godhead did sit to determine soteriological actuality for Adam, before he is eventually created. It had been agreed between the Father and the Son, not without the acquiescent nod of the Holy Spirit, however. This is why the Church is God’s most phenomenal business venture. Divine security has been established for her – the Bride of Christ. Is the Adamic being not in free moral agency existence? He must be given the opportunity of choice. So, God, no doubt, did ask Adam to be made to fall asleep for Divine surgical operation of taking a rib: a rib to build His Church. It must be the rib by his side for two reasons. The rib looks like the rainbow which stands as the object of the covenant – between God and Noah – of not destroying the world with water again (Genesis 9:13). It must be the rib: for Israel, of which there is no other nation closer to God, is ‘a prince by the side of Jehovah.’ Man, a free moral agent, must be taken into consideration, except you do not understand that free moral agency went into his creation. God, being the Gentleman of eternality, must acknowledge His own terms of creationism. On account of Noah’s free moral agency God did approach him, “Build an ark: for I must preserve you: my expensive treasure.” I wonder where Dr. Abel Damina plucked his idea that, “God never told Noah to build an ark!” To prove that the ark was God’s idea, the Bible records the architectural specifications in Genesis 6:14-18.Read More