15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0
John 14:14

HE IS THE WORD OF GOD (two)

0 Comments
How can this Word ever remain the recondite essence of Divinity and yet remain a classification of object of creationism? The Word cannot be partial God and partial entity of creation. That will be freakish rivalry with the Divinity. The Divine Logos is very God of very God. Babel language experience gives irrefragable credence to Jesus' Omniscience. Billions pray everyday. To the invocating billions and thousands of languages Jesus Christ says, “If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it” (John 14:14). There is, most certainly, more of Jesus, the Word of God, than our eyes and understanding are capable of apprehending. The Author of creation must, of certainty, be in proper existence before His authorship of anything. The same reason why examination papers cannot be as old as or older than the lecturing examiner is what strictly accounts for the reason why the Author of creation must be in existence before the eternal past. The eternal past cannot be accounted for à la scientific notation. The Word of God is the Ancient of days. Adonai made His way down to our earth; headed straight to Abraham’s abode. The Visitant, escorted by two angels, held discussion with His host, Abraham, and even ate a sumptuous meal in His friend’s house. The LORD God, after His rapprochement with Abraham, left and went up to His empyreal abode; all these in historical facticity. Amen.Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (IX)

0 Comments
Damina, unfortunately, had to mention names of prominent rich people who have nothing to do with the Church of the Living God, to prove that the Church cannot make anybody rich. Definitely, Dr. Damina did not acquire his riches through the blessing of the Author of the Church. You know what Damina said, “If you want to make money, go outside the Church.” Unbelievable, you must agree. Damina said that Solomon did not have to ask God for money because kings are always rich, especially, with David as his father. If Solomon had depended on the treasure left by David, for the building of the Jerusalem Temple, it would not have been Solomonic grand. Is it not good that Damina will spill out from his pastoral mind that Solomon was already rich and did not need to ask for what he already had, which is quite logical. But it is very wise to place logicality side by the side theological flawlessness to arrive safely at the true mind of God. Damina, what is really wrong with your reasoning? Are you absolutely sold to the enemy of Scripture? Let us look at what many people do not seem to see. Why would God say to Solomon, “And I have also given thee that which thou hast not asked, both riches, and honour: so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days;” if Solomon had all the riches he needed? Is God verbose? Is God not the absolute Economist when it comes to word usage? Does the last sentence of 1Kings 3:13 not expressly say from God’s holy mouth, “so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days”? King Solomon was not this rich. Damina’s warped mind of Sabellianism does not know this simple fact. His thoughts are far from the Most High Jehovah. Damina’s insistence that, “go outside the Church to make money,” is terribly flawed. Satanism has perfectly bewitched you, Abel Damina, to the point of absolute beguilement! Eden Garden is God’s House, which is not different from the Church. Rivers that flowed out of Eden is laden with riches. In Eden the LORD God visited them every cool of the evening. Eden is the first Church; riches flowed from Eden (Genesis 2:10-12). Does Jesus promise John 14:14, “If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it”? Why should we go to Church, ask Jesus of riches, and it will amount to theological faux pas? The Church is one stop shop for all needs of Adamic creatures; with faith that is solely based on the revealed word of God.Read More