“The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand” (Psalm 110:1)

(…continues from part one…)

2)            Some teachers of Bible believe this modalistic position of Monarchian sect, which by the reason of its Scriptural baselessness, makes it an incursion of Satanism with ineluctable ternary motto of come to steal, kill and destroy. The first sentence of the Bible bespeaks the Trinitarian concept. The fourth word of Genesis 1:1, ‘God’, is Elohiym, a plurality of the Members of the Godhead. The Father spoke in commencement of creationism. The ipseity of the Second Member, Christ, the Light of verse three, manifested physically to consummate re-creationism. In verse two, it says, “And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters” (Genesis 1:2). Was God talking to two disposable faces in the divine decision of Genesis 1:26, “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”?

                Psalm 110:1 “The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.” How could King David have two Lords of spiritual latria? Why would the prophetic utterance of King David reveal Two separate individualism of יהוה  Yehôvâh (LORD) and ‘Âdôn (Lord) if They are not Two distinctive Entities of the Godhead? Manichaeism, definitely, sees the Christ of Psalm 110:1 as mythical mirage of Divine masquerading epiphany. I will never say that God cannot or will not do that. But the thing is: the Scriptures cannot support this Sabellianism. Period. Genesis 1:1 and John 1:3 point to distinctive ipseity in the Godhead: for verse one of John chapter one states categorically, “and the Word was with God”.

The preposition ‘with’ is the Greek pros which means ‘before; in presence of’. If this Logos did call things which be not, as though they were in the consummation of the creationism, the separative pros reveals, absolutely, another distinctive Personage of the Godhead. Eight times in John 14:2; 12; 28; 16:10; 16; 17; 28; 20:17, we read the impression of, “I go to the Father” from the divine lips of Jesus. The word ‘go’ is not ‘an infusion’ or ‘discarding’ of the Christ. It is anabainō (an-ab-ah’-ee-no): ‘ascend, to go up’ in John 20:17. It is poreuomai (por-yoo’-om-ahee): ‘traverse i.e. travel’ in John 16:28; 14:28; 14:12; 14:2. And for John 16:10; 16 and 17 it is hupagō (hoop-ag’-o): ‘to withdraw one’s self, to go away, depart.’ In each communication One Entity of the Godhead, Jesus Christ, is going on a journey to meet another Personage, the Father – two of Them!

Even the four awesome angels God’s throne cannot take the book from God.

The four awesome angels must cover their faces and legs before the thrice holy God. This means they do not have the capacity of eternality to stretch their hands to receive from the One seated on the celestial throne. None other, in the entire heaven, could exercise the Bible the documentation of, “And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon” (Revelation 5:3). One indubitable reason why none in heaven could attempt the walk to the throne is because they all are beings of creationism.

Let us go to Revelation 5:6-8 6) “And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the four beasts, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth. 7) And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne. 8) And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.” This dramatic exposition of the Book of Revelation makes absolute nonsense of “Oneness” (vigorously supported by Dr. Abel Damina) didacticism of the Godhead.

This One, Who walked up to and took from the One Who sits on the throne, possesses the feet and arms of eternality, ergo, He could achieve that feat of taking from the eternal hand of God, Who Himself is very God of very God. Did the LORD God divide Himself into the Eternal Father and the Lamb, the Son of God? The Bible says, “And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb,” signifying the absolute ipseity of the Second Member of the Godhead, Jesus Christ. Will the angelic awesome foursome bow in latria before another, other than the Eternality of the seated Father? You know something? Hawkers of the teaching of Divine oneness anomalism will want to argue that it is only the Christ – one of the masks of the Godhead – that is being given the latria in this verse. No problem; let us read still from the Bible. Revelation 6:16 “And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:” and if this is not enough there is Revelation 7:10 “And cried with a loud voice, saying, Salvation to our God which sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb.” In each verse above the employment of ‘and’ reveals Two distinctive Entities of Divinity.

Getting born again is a conscious effort on the part of an individual. Get born again. You were born in sin. Say this sinner’s prayer.

“Dear heavenly Father, I come to You now in the name of Jesus Christ. I believe in my heart that Jesus is the Son of God. I believe that Jesus died on the cross for my sin. I believe that You raised Him from the dead. I confess with my mouth that Jesus is Lord, and I receive Him now as my Lord and my Saviour. I give God all the glory. Amen!”

(…to be continued…)

Read part one here

Visits: 72