Matthew 2:2 “Where is he that is born King of the Jews? For we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.” Why worship a new born babe if the revelatory signs do not unveil the Deity from the third heaven; which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty? God revealed to the magicians the Incarnation of the Saviour of the world. They understood that this new born babe is the Messiah, the LORD God of the Bible. They understood that to the Incarnate Christ belonged the latria: to the Holy Babe they bowed in worship. John 3:13 “And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.” Nicodemus got further flabbergasted when Jesus intimated him with the words of the above verse. Quite abstruse this revelation of Him is. How could He, seated very close to Nicodemus, yet is seated in the throne room of heaven: quite abstruse. How else would one prove the facticity of the Divine ubiquity of Jesus? None can be present in more than one place. Omnipresence is the sole preserve of the LORD God, the Creator. The reason why I have to include the definition of ‘and' is simply to teach the gross error of some teachers of the Bible who insist on Sabellian theological defect which insists that there is only one Person in the Godhead. Kai is an inference to distinction between the Father and the Son in the Godhead. The word ‘are’ is semen (es-men’): ‘First person plural indicative of eime (we are). Eime, when it is used for the Divinity speaks of an existence outside of creationism. If Jesus used eime it means there are more than one Person in the Godhead. Read More