How wise is it to choose to ignore the Christ, knowing that He is the Person of Zechariah 12:10? Apocryphal leaning teach that the prophecy about the One coming from Edom with dyed garments is Judas Maccabeus. Historical event actually has the documentation of Judas Maccabeus and his war exploit for he overcame the Idumeans, and killed twenty thousand men. Another supposed character of Isaiah 63:1 is Michael, the archangel. John Calvin interpreted the glorious arrayed warrior as Yahweh trampling down on His enemies while seated on the throne in heaven. His argument is that Isaiah was doing prophetic, “Thus sayeth Yahweh.” Insuperable dissatisfactions, from the point of Scripture, render the above three interpretations unfamiliar to scriptural reading of Isaiah 63:1. God the Father, in truth, was heard saying the words of Psalm 110:1. But we know that the dramatic involvement of this verse (Isaiah 40:3-5), from Calvin’s point, cannot be practically ascribed to the Father, Who is never seen physically, in the Scripture, vacating the empyrean throne. David saw the Messiah through the Holy Spirit’s inspiration, about a thousand years BC. The Jesus David saw will carry the sins of the world, and be counted among sinners bound for hell, but Jesus will not be a candidate of hellish ruination. His body will not see corruption in the sense that there will be no need to break His legs to hasten His crucifixional death, and more importantly, He will not suffer the attendant decay that dead people undergo.Read More