15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0
Psalm 110:1

GOD DOES THINGS IN STYLE (Five)

0 Comments
Did He not know that His friend, Lazarus, was dying? Why would He wait for four whole days after the death of His friend before showing up? He wanted to prove His Omnipotence and His Omnipresence essence. His Omnipotence raised the dead Lazarus; and His Omnipresence went down to the land of the dead, even Abraham’s bosom, to bring the dead Lazarus back to life on terra firma once again. For two reasons God adopted the tripartite manifestation of the Godhead. The Trinity was not just for the fun of it: it was first for Himself, then for the salvation of man. Relationship does attract the concept of I-It, I-Thou and the plurality of We-You. The second reason for the Trinitarian quiddity is strictly for the actuation of the soteriology. God knew man will suffer his free moral agency to be infected by Satanism. The Creator had foreknown the remnants who would receive Jehovah Jesus as Lord and Saviour. It has been decided among the Members of the Godhead that the Father must be seated eternally on the celestial throne. God the Son, the direct Creator, took it upon Himself to perform the sanguineous substitutionary Golgotha sacrifice, while the Holy Spirit would be seated in the holy of holies in the Jerusalem Temple, receiving the latria due to the God of Israel. For my salvation Jehovah decided to be Three of Persons. The Trinity is One worshipped God. God became a man to root out and cleanse the Adamic race of the annihilative excrescence of sin.Read More

REJECT THE WORDS OF JESUS TO YOUR OWN PERIL (7)

0 Comments
Jesus knew what He had come to do, and because of the love He has for mankind, whom He had created in His likeness and image, He endured it all. You know what? No other person matches the Messianic ipseity other than Jesus in the history of mankind. The possibility of the Messiah not being Jesus of Nazareth is ratio one to one billion (1:1000000000), which, mathematically, proves the impossibility of another, other than Jesus, being the Christ, the Saviour of the world. ‘Âdon is used of: a human master of servants (Genesis 24:14&27; Genesis 39:2 and Genesis 39:7); possessor (1Kings 16:24); kings, as lords of their subjects (Isaiah 26:13); the husband, as lord of a wife (Genesis 18:12); hence of God as the possessor and ruler of the world (Genesis 14:19; Deuteronomy 10:17; Psalms 24:1; 50:10; 115:16; Matthew 11:25 & Luke 10:21).The Greek Kurios (koo’-ree-os) has the same understanding of the Hebraic Yehôvâh, ‘ădônây, and ‘Âdon.Read More

REJECT THE WORDS OF JESUS TO YOUR OWN PERIL (6)

0 Comments
How wise is it to choose to ignore the Christ, knowing that He is the Person of Zechariah 12:10? Apocryphal leaning teach that the prophecy about the One coming from Edom with dyed garments is Judas Maccabeus. Historical event actually has the documentation of Judas Maccabeus and his war exploit for he overcame the Idumeans, and killed twenty thousand men. Another supposed character of Isaiah 63:1 is Michael, the archangel. John Calvin interpreted the glorious arrayed warrior as Yahweh trampling down on His enemies while seated on the throne in heaven. His argument is that Isaiah was doing prophetic, “Thus sayeth Yahweh.” Insuperable dissatisfactions, from the point of Scripture, render the above three interpretations unfamiliar to scriptural reading of Isaiah 63:1. God the Father, in truth, was heard saying the words of Psalm 110:1. But we know that the dramatic involvement of this verse (Isaiah 40:3-5), from Calvin’s point, cannot be practically ascribed to the Father, Who is never seen physically, in the Scripture, vacating the empyrean throne. David saw the Messiah through the Holy Spirit’s inspiration, about a thousand years BC. The Jesus David saw will carry the sins of the world, and be counted among sinners bound for hell, but Jesus will not be a candidate of hellish ruination. His body will not see corruption in the sense that there will be no need to break His legs to hasten His crucifixional death, and more importantly, He will not suffer the attendant decay that dead people undergo.Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (IV)

0 Comments
Damina teaches on wealth acquisition. I quote him verbatim: “If you follow the Bible to make money, you’ll be poor all your life. That’s why the poorest people are in Church.” According to this man, who believes he is a Bible teacher, “The Bible is a poor material for money making.” This is what Dr. Damina has to say about the great Patriarch of Israel, “Abraham was a shrewd, wicked businessman. When he discovered he was broke, he used his wife as collateral to bring money.” Is Dr. Abel Damina truly called by Jesus to pastor in the Lord’s vineyard? When I told a concerned Christian Brother, Joseph Uwana, that Damina probably takes something to enhance his idiosyncratic faux pas when it comes to biblical didacticism, the dear Brother said, “I believe he takes very huge doses of the substance:” which I want to agree with. Is it impossible that some haters of Jesus could have approached Damina with huge amount of money to get him to distort the Bible? One cannot rule out Damina's possibility of having dined with Satanism, ergo, his spirited voracity to impugn revealed words of theological flawlessness. The first thing to ask is how he came about the empirical data proving that the Church habours the poorest of the globe. We need to understand what the Bible is. It is the express Word of God, aimed at Adamic growth, restoration, salvation and nurture in all ramifications. God surrounded Adam and his Woman with everything that makes the unknown – phenomenality of lack – a nonexistent issue. The four rivers that ran out of Eden were filled with untold riches. Who put these riches there, Adam? If God is the Creator of wealth, can His love letter (the Bible) not contain modus of wealth acquisition? But trust Damina and his arcane sophistry. Damina will use eisegetical wickedness to debunk scriptural clarity – as if that does not constitute evil rascality when it comes to running a bucolic office of the Lord’s vineyard. Today’s Churches are truly filled with ear-itchy ignorant mass. They will choose to believe wrong teachings. Anyone who tells you that the Bible cannot make you rich is conversely saying that God cannot make one rich. Is God not the Author of the Bible? Is the Church, which is the house of God, not the pillar and ground of truth? Does it make any sense at all, that an architectural structure that domiciliates the assemblage of God’s children, cannot teach anyone how to become very wealthy? Is the Bible bereft of wealth creativity for the children of God?Read More

Didactic Incongruity With The Scripture (II)

0 Comments
Some teachers of Bible believe this modalistic position of Monarchian sect, which by the reason of its Scriptural baselessness, makes it an incursion of Satanism with ineluctable ternary motto of come to steal, kill and destroy. The first sentence of the Bible bespeaks the Trinitarian concept. The fourth word of Genesis 1:1, ‘God’, is Elohiym, a plurality of the Members of the Godhead. The Father spoke in commencement of creationism. The ipseity of the Second Member, Christ, the Light of verse three, manifested physically to consummate re-creationism. In verse two, it says, “And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters” (Genesis 1:2). Was God talking to two disposable faces in the divine decision of Genesis 1:26? This One, Who walked up to and took from the One Who sits on the throne, possesses the feet and arms of eternality, ergo, He could achieve that feat of taking from the eternal hand of God, Who Himself is very God of very God. Did the LORD God divide Himself into the Eternal Father and the Lamb, the Son of God? The Bible says, “And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb,” signifying the absolute ipseity of the Second Member of the Godhead, Jesus Christ. Will the angelic awesome foursome bow in latria before another, other than the Eternality of the seated Father? You know something? Hawkers of the teaching of Divine oneness anomalism will want to argue that it is only the Christ – one of the masks of the Godhead – that is being given the latria in this verse.Read More

UNVEILING THE SECOND MEMBER OF THE GODHEAD [two]

0 Comments
There are three distinct LORDS in the heavenly assizes: the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. If the first LORD is the Eternal Father, and the second Lord is the Second Member of the Godhead, Christ, then Jesus Christ is indeed the Lord from heaven (John 3:13). That Jesus Christ has Sovereignty of celestial Lordship means that angels have always worshipped Him. Angels, as we understand, will not worship any other save the Lord God. The Second Member of the Godhead is, without doubt, essentially God.Read More

IS THE LORD GOD THE AUTHOR OF MORAL EVIL? (four)

2 Comments
One of the meanings of 'Ĕlôhı̂ym is 'magistrate'. God's guilt will rob Him of all moral justifications to try anybody. His insistence on judging wrongdoers will only give Him the evil persona of a sadistic tyrant. A guilty judge has no rectitude of any moral standing to try any offender. He must vacate the bench. God will forever be the good KING. Why? The good Book says in Psalm 110:1, "A Psalm of David. The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool." All enemies of righteousness must come to judgment. The sinless Jehovah cannot be one of the condemnable lots. Why His righteous holiness is eternally a certainty is found in Psalm 45:6, which says, "Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre."Read More

What Enigmatizes Jesus (1)

0 Comments
"For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace". Is it not because there is a clear difference between 'child' and 'son'? The child is the incarnation of the Eternal Son. The 'child' is the humanity of Him while the 'son' is His Deity, (it can only be given): this is the hypostatic union. Jesus is 100% man and 100% God; and is enigmatically in one Personage (leaving science stupefied: for no compound comes to this calculation).Read More