Celestial drama unfolded in Revelation chapter 5 proving distinction of the Persons of the Godhead. Waited, God did to make sure that no intelligent being of creationism will dare come forward to take the scroll from His Divine hand. Then strolled Jesus, in all the magnificence of Deity, and did what none could ever do. Christ stretched His own hand of eternality to take from the hand of the Ancient of days – it takes the hand of eternality to take and to open what the Eternal Father holds. Amen. In the Godhead dwells the mystery of the three distinct Persons of creationism. When one believes he has his congregation firmly under the control of his thumb, he continues to look for more dominant ways. Damina does not agree with the Bible, saying, “Jesus is not the Lion of Judah.”How can this man just not acknowledge the metaphorical allusion at literary play here? Even if a simile is employed in this regard, does it make Jesus an unruly beast of jungle? Rather than enjoy the metaphor, Dr Damina chose to read an unnecessary malapropism to glorify his habitual eisegetical approach to Scripture. Scripture, as we understand, must explain scriptural mind of theology. So, how does Scripture support Scripture in this case? Let us take a critical look at Damina’s claim that, “Abraham was a dubious businessman;” he did not stop there; he went on to malign the character of Abraham’s grandson, saying, “Jacob too used Benjamin as collateral to make money.”How does one explain Damina’s rationale behind teaching that Abraham proved to be a dubious man, sourcing his Bible text from Genesis chapters 12 and 20; involving Pharaoh of Egypt and Abimelech of Gerar respectively? Contrary to Damina’s cautioning to be silent when the Bible is silent and be loud when the Bible so is, Damina is outrageously loud where there is no biblical authorization.Read More