15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (7)

0 Comments
Before Jesus conquered death, which He must, to consummate soteriology, He led the spirit of death, Satan and his evil principalities in a triumphant procession to heaven. Jesus is the first to resurrect from death; He, as the Adonai, must of necessity take preeminence in all things. Does the Qur’an give any empyreal insight into where Muhammad went after his death? Allah, obviously, did not prepare his last prophet for his eventual demise, to enable Muhammad to tidy up the Quranic documentation of his empyrean entry after death. Jesus did not only go directly to heaven, He sat, in heaven, at the right hand of empyrean Majesty. How can he be the first to resurrect when the genuineness of the Hadith clearly documents, “Narrated ‘Abu Huraira: “When Allah revealed the Verse: “Warn your nearest kinsmen,” Allah’s Messenger (pbuh) got up and said, “O people of Quraish (or said similar words)! Buy (i.e. save) yourselves (from the Hellfire) as I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment; O Bani `Abd Manaf! I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment, O Safiya, the Aunt of Allah’s Messenger (pbuh)! I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment; O Fatima bint Muhammad! Ask me anything from my wealth, but I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Wills and Testaments (Wasaayaa) Book 55, Hadith 16)? Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (6)

0 Comments
His name, Muhammad means praiseworthy; Ahmad means one who praises Allah more than others; Al-Mahi means Allah will eliminate Al-Kufr (infidelity) through him; he is Al-Hashir – the first to be resurrected, the people being resurrected thereafter; and he is also Al-‘Aqib, after whom there will be no other Prophet. These are very good credentials, no doubt. Of the one hundred and fifty Psalms in the Bible, David alone wrote seventy-eight of them. Go through Davidic Psalms and you will be marvelled at the piety of David’s heart of praise. Show me the Qur’anic praises of Muhammad, not forgetting to add those contained in the Hadiths as well; and I will open the Biblical Psalms and you can judge for yourself which of the hearts of Muhammad and David is closer to the Almighty Creator. The Davidic Psalm 110 opens with, “The LORD said to my Lord, sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thine footstool.” That which was not intended for the ears of man, God allowed David to eavesdrop. The first LORD (in capitals) is the covenant name, JEHOVAH, of God. The second Lord with capital ‘L’ is ‘âdôn (aw-done’): ‘From an unused root (meaning to rule); sovereign, that is, controller (human or divine); lord; master; owner.’ The spiritual status of Jesus as the ʻÂdôn makes Him the LORD and Owner of all entities of creation.Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (5)

0 Comments
Jesus was put to trial, was severely punished – as it had been prophesied –; He died on the cross and was buried. Who is this Allah that denies the Sonship and the crucifixion of the Christ? The Bible documents that He arose from death in the early hours of the third day which happened to be the first day of the week. Remember that the LORD of the Sabbath rested on the seventh day of creation. Right? Why would He rise up on the first day? Is it not to prove that He owns the first and the last days? Does it remind us of the reason why He is the Alpha and Omega? Selah! The kernel of kerygmatic essentiality of Christian gospel is the Golgotha substitutionary event. Hebrews 9:22, 25 & 26 “And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission. 25) Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; 26) For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.” The words of Jesus to His disciples concerning His resurrection is documented in Luke 24:44-47 This took place after He had risen from death, talking with two of His disciples (obviously of the seventy) who were mourning His death, while on their way to Emmaus. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (4)

0 Comments
Who is the Testator of the Old Testamentary order? God? Yes, it is the LORD God. If a better covenant must be put in permanent place, by whose legality of power can it come into existence? Of course, the same LORD God. Who said to the disciples, “This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you?” It is the same Christ, who followed them in the wilderness and showed His glory to Moses in Exodus 33:18-23; 34:5-8 & 34:29-34. Muhammadan teaching says, “Allah made the young man look exactly like `Isa, while a hole opened in the roof of the house,” in An-Nisa i.e. the fourth chapter, verse 157, and I am wondering who that young man was. John seemed to be younger than the rest of the disciples; if John was the one Muhammad meant, he is very, very wrong. John did not die immediately after the Golgotha crucifixion, he outlived all the Apostolic Fathers. Who is this Allah that denies the sanguineous, substitutionary death of Jesus, on the Golgotha cross? Muhammadan denial can only be an evil concoction of Satanism. This is the honest confession of non-followers of Jesus Christ: “Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God” (Matthew 27:54). Amen. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (3)

0 Comments
Who says Jesus Christ did not taste of death? That person must definitely be the worst calumnious candidate of Satanism. The death of the holy One of Israel had already gone the way of Divine ukase way back in Genesis 3:15 “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” By ‘bruise his heel’, the humanity of Jesus is meant. Jesus Christ died on the cross; He rose on the third day to deal a destructive, bruising blow on the Devil’s head. Why do you think God demanded Isaac’s sacrificial trial from Abraham? It is to legitimize a spiritual phenomenon: the LORD God experiments a similitude of event on terra firma. God would not go to any other person – who would disappoint Him –; to Abraham, His friend, whose faith in the Creator is definitely Gibraltar fixed, God went to perform a similitude of the ultimate Golgotha soteriological arrangement. Salvation must be sanguineous. The life of the Adamic creation is in his blood. For the sinner to regain fellowship with his Creator, blood must pay for blood. When they committed the original sin, a quadruped was killed, not only to engage in the exchange of the sinless animals for the Adamic sinfulness, but also and very importantly, to propitiate God. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (2)

0 Comments
“Muhammad” – in G.J.O. Moshay’s admittance of him, in his book, ‘Who Is This Allah?' – “is at best a philosopher.” The prophet of Allah, wanting at all cost to discredit Christianity, resorted to horrid regurgitation of the casuist that he was, when in An-Ni’sa, the fourth chapter, verse 157, the commentary says, “Allah made the young man look exactly like `Isa, while a hole opened in the roof of the house, and `Isa was made to sleep and ascended to heaven while asleep.” This is egregiousness of speciousness. Acts 1:9 “And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.” Verses 7 and 8 document what He was telling them. Do these verses show any sign of Muhammadan calumnious somnambulistic ascension? Why would Muhammad decide to use a cave as the rendezvous of Divine connectivity? The answer is very simple. He wanted to replicate the Mount Sinai phenomenon. The deception, I believe, is calculated to tell the world of religiosity that the God of the Bible had rejected Israel, Jewry and Christianity. How does one challenge the last prophet of the Most High? He needed to add that angle to make Islam God’s choice of religious worship. That is the reason for another cavernous rendezvous. The Qur’an contains 75% of the Bible. Unfortunately, the Bible is never up for any replication. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (1)

0 Comments
The microcosm of the entire thirty-one thousand, one hundred and two verses of the Bible is John 3:16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” This verse, which sums up God’s mind and intent for mankind, touches on His love, His gift of the only begotten Son, eternal damnation and the soteriology. The death of the Son is substitutionary: the life of sinless Second Member of the Godhead for the lost Adamic souls. Sin is a curse as we understand Ezekiel 18:4 “Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.” And Wisdom, the personification of the Christ, makes it clear in Proverbs 8:36 “But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.” Sin, for this scriptural reason, is truly a reproach. Not wanting to destroy sinful man, God designed redemption way out in John 3:16. When Prophet Muhammad began his Islamic campaign, one of the antagonistic teaching of the Islamic protocolary Qur’an against Christianity was an oppugnation of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (5)

0 Comments
Who gives divine commandments? Is it not the LORD God of the Bible? The uniqueness of Jesus Christ is His Divinity. Does He not give the commandments of 1John 2:4-5? Muhammad clearly admitted that Jesus is Christ, fine. But he, unfortunately, failed to acknowledge the deity of Christ – theological aberrancy! If Muhammad gets a pass mark in his admittance of Jesus’ Christological essence, his incorrigible bent on Qur’ainc denial of divine Sonship of the Christ evidently validates the antichrist mission of Muhammad. There is absolutely nothing separating the Father and the Son: for They, together with the Holy Spirit form one God to Whom the entire creations give latria prostration. The Father sits to judge. The Son, having been poured forth in propitiation, to avert eternal damnation, must be the One to lead us to the Father’s acceptability. Where is the Holy Spirit, a prying thought would ask? He took a dwelling in the born again Christian, authenticating the celestial citizenship of the regenerated soul. Salvation requires the process of believing the Son of God – which Muhammad rejects – in John 3:16; and the asseverative confession of the Lordship of Jesus over one’s life in Romans 10:9. Muhammad’s abnegation of the Sonship of Jesus makes him, Muhammad, a liar, according to the Scripture found in 1John 2:22-23. The fact that the invocation of Jesus is a must to benefit in the divine beneficence of spiritual regeneration substantiates the Deity of Jesus Christ. Amen. Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (4)

0 Comments
If centuries before the birth of Muhammad the Bible had pointed out the Lord Jesus to the world as the ‘reconciler’ or the ‘intercessor’ between God and man, how could Muhammad claim to be the unbiblical intercessor on the Judgment Day in Sahih al-Bukhari Book 60 Hadith 15? In fact the prophet of Allah said he would go as far as retrieving those who had been languishing in hell fire! Without equivocation this Islamic revelation is sourced from purgatorial didacticism of Catholicism; which St. Augustine (354–430) distinguished between the purgatorial fire that will burn off stains and the everlasting fire that consumes those who die unrepentant and unreconciled to the church: of which Clement of Alexandria and Origen believed that punishment by God must be to educate and, thereby, contribute to salvation. It had before them been a teaching of Platonism. And much longer than Plato, purgatorial Buddhism is the term ‘Naraka’ meaning “hell”. Islam has belief similarities with Zoroastrianism, Buddhism and sees Christianity through the unscriptural ritualism of the Romish Church. An inerudite Muhammad quaffed to inebriation the umbilical Popery doctrines of the Catholic Church. There cannot be two intercessors. Muhammad denies the Divinity of Christ only to use subtlety to present himself as the Messiah. Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (3)

0 Comments
Alpha and Omega is the ‘the all in all,’ without Whom nothing will come into existence. He calls Himself “the Almighty”. To be Almighty expresses His Omnipotence, Omniscience and the unfathomable Omnipresence. Everything has its source in the Almighty Alpha and Omega. Muhammadan Islam will not make mention of this essence of Christ simply because it will defeat Muhammad’s denial of Christ’s divinity. Revelation 3:14, “And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;” John quotes the Visitant to his Island of Patmos confinement. The Greek for ‘Amen’ is amen (a-meen'): ‘1. (properly) firm. 2. (figuratively) trustworthy. 3. (adverbially) surely. 4. (often as interjection) so be it.’ It comes from the Hebraic 'âmên (aw-mane'): ‘1. sure. 2. (abstract) faithfulness. 3. (adverb) truly; 4. so be it, truth.’ There is no way that Jesus would be the ‘AMEN; and He would not be God: for only God can be the personification of Truthfulness. Every uttered “Amen” is an invocation of the Son of God for speedy answer to prayers. Did Muhammad ever vocalize “’Āmīn?” If he did, as several times he said it, he called on the Son of God to agree with his petition before the Father, probably without knowing it! 2Corinthians 1:20 “For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.” Through Jesus Christ God made every promise. Without Jesus, the Logos, God does not say anything. Christ is the totality of God’s mind, will and purpose. Amen. Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (2)

0 Comments
Romans 8:14-16 “For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. 15) For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. 16) The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God.” ‘Adoption’ of Romans 8:15 is huiothesia (hwiy-yo-the-siy'-a): ‘1. the placing as a son. 2. (concretely) adoption. 3. (figuratively) Christian sonship in respect to God.’ ‘Abba’ is Abba (ab-ba'): ‘(vocatively) Abba, father; {referring to or addressing one's father}.’ ‘Children’ of verse 16 is teknon (tek'-non): ‘a child (as produced).’ Evidently not led by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit (totally alien to Allah’s prophet), Muhammad suffered from the poverty of the heart that was devoid of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, a filial existence which did ostracize Muhammad from the family of Jehovah of the Christian Bible, therefore, he could not, pathetically, have said, “Abba, Father.” The Book of John 3:16 says, “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” If Jesus Christ is not the Personage of divine Sonship the Bible will not say so in John 3:16. His Sonship is the Greek monogenes huios. Monogenes (mo-no-ǰe-nees') – only begotten – means: ‘only-born (i.e. sole)’; huios (hwiy-yos') means: ‘1. a son. 2. (of animals) a colt, etc. 3. (broadly) a descendant.’ Huios happens to be the highest form of sonship; the traditional huios is equal in status to his father; and that is the reason why the Jews wanted to stone Jesus for calling God His Father. The uniqueness of the Sonship of Jesus truly translates to the Lord’s asseveration of John 10:30, “I and my Father are one.” Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (1)

0 Comments
With the exception of Muhammad all other mentioned prophets (All Jewish) in the Qur’an did vaticinate saying, “Thus saith Jehovah”; Allah had no mentioning in their mouths throughout centuries of their Bible missionary vaticination. Millennia permanency of the Bible makes it the authentic scriptural relevance of theology. The Holy Bible furnishes its reader with historical dates, names, events and locations; all of which pass the tests of archeological and other researches. What else does one expect from the Bible, is it not the book of God’s Authorship? Without any scintilla of equivocation, I strongly believe that Muhammad should never have mentioned the stories, characters and events of the Bible to the establishment of his Islamic Qur’an. Prophet Muhammad should have limited himself to the twenty-five percent Islamic availability of the religion’s didacticism. But unfortunately, his dabble into the theological intricacies of the Christian divine protocolary exposes his stark ignorance or demonic assisted religious domination.Read More

JOHN 3 VERSE 16 AND ISLAM (Five)

0 Comments
The ‘whosoever’ is in reference to anyone who would believe the gospel of salvation through Christ Jesus, Whose mission to the world was to bring the light of salvation to the world, sacrifice Himself substitutionally, thereby providing the new and the living way: of eternal consequence. In all occurrences of phenomenality, the Fatherhood of the Son and the Spirit is the most astounding conundrum. John 3:16 is the sole, Divine solution to the sin question. Muhammad’s Allah says he has no ‘son’; the LORD God of the Bible says, “This is My beloved Son in Whom I Am well pleased.” Which one of Allah and Jehovah is the true God? Muhammad taught in An-Nisa’ 4:157 “…“Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it…. And they did not kill him, for certain.” What does one make of the asseveration of Jesus in John 10:17-18 “Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. 18) No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.” The Lord Jesus prognosticated His Golgotha death according to the will of God the Father. And what does it connote by the fact that He has both the power to lay down His life – in death – and to take it back – coming back to life? Jesus simply tells us that He has the power of Divinity! Which of the Christian God – Jehovah – and the Islamic God – Allah – is to be believed? Selah! Jesus, indeed, died to save the world. Praise the LORD! Read More

JOHN 3 VERSE 16 AND ISLAM (Four)

0 Comments
Genesis 3:15, written about two thousand years before Muhammad’s recitations of the Qur’an reads, “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” Davidic writing, couched over a thousand years before Muhammadan advent says in Psalm 22:1 “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring?” Psalm 22:17 “I may tell all my bones: they look and stare upon me.” Also Muhammad recited the words of Allah in (Yunus) 10:68 “They have said, “Allah has taken a son.” Exalted is He; He is the [one] Free of need. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth. You have no authority for this [claim]. Do you say about Allah that which you do not know?” The New Testament account of the crucifixion takes its authority in the verses of Old Testament. Exodus 24:8 “And Moses took the blood, and sprinkled it on the people, and said, Behold the blood of the covenant, which the LORD hath made with you concerning all these words.” Psalm 22:18 “They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.” This was fulfilled in John 19:23 “Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a part; and also his coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout.” Read More

JOHN 3 VERSE 16 AND ISLAM (Three)

0 Comments
Genesis 22:12 “And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me.” It was important for Abraham to be made to give up his son, Isaac, the second of the three patriarchs, giving God the legality of giving up also the Second Member of the Godhead for the salvation of man. Mark 12:6-7 “Having yet therefore one son, his wellbeloved, he sent him also last unto them, saying, They will reverence my son. 7) But those husbandmen said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and the inheritance shall be our’s.” This parable Jesus told His audience in an intimation of His substitutionary death. To provide the soteriology its eternal feet of legality, it was necessitous, the day before the Passion Week, to enter the legalistic chambers of Mosaic script and make amendment suitable for the Church Age of the grace dispensation, when He said, “This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you” (Luke 22:20).Read More

JOHN 3 VERSE 16 AND ISLAM (Two)

0 Comments
The Trinity is truly involved in this salvation: the Father shows His abundant love by the appearance of Jesus, our Saviour. Our sinful gene got renewed by the Holy Spirit for the consummation of righteousness that makes us eternal heirs of the Divinity. Does Islam believe in Adamic heirship of the Divinity? Muhammad hates the idea of Jehovah having children. Al-Isra’ is the 17th chapter of the Qur’an, verse 111 reads, “And say, “Praise to Allah, who has not taken a son and has had no partner in [His] dominion and has no [need of a] protector out of weakness; and glorify Him with [great] glorification.”” The Christian heirship is borne out of the fact of Romans 8:15 “For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.” Of Scriptural truth, our filial propinquity is well captured in Ephesians 1:3-6. The love of God is responsible for His beneficence towards the sending of Jesus Christ to be the propitiation for our sin. Our good deeds are nothing short of Isaiah 64:6 ‘filthy rags’ where the first word, ‛êd (ayd) is: ‘menstrual flux’, and the second beged (behg’-ed) is: ‘garment, clothing (used indiscriminately)'. Our moral righteousness cannot save us. It is the love of God, flowing from the beneficence of His grace is what saves our souls from eternal damnation. Islamic theological belief shares no correlative understanding verse when you look at Sahih al-Bukhari, Hajj (Pilgrimage); Book 25, Hadith 7 Read More

JOHN 3 VERSE 16 AND ISLAM (One)

0 Comments
John chapter three verse sixteen is the entire Bible compacted in one single verse. God’s intent and will bespeak its theological posture. God’s responsible stance is seen in His divine care for His creation. His beneficence is the gift of eternal life through the Author of creationism. God’s grand gift to the fallen Adamic creature is the soteriology. Most definitely, all that the LORD God is trying to communicate to mankind is none other than Jesus Christ. One classic Qur’anic chapter of Christ’s divine Sonship vitiation is the 112th, titled Al-Ikhlas of which all the verses of 1-4 reads: “Say, “He is Allah, [who is] One, 2) Allah, the Eternal Refuge. 3) He neither begets nor is born, 4) Nor is there to Him any equivalent.” For this Muhammadan recitation, nothing changes the minds of true Moslems. However, the Bible is the finality of God’s dealings with humanity. The love of God is most evident with the birth of Jesus Christ. Can anyone bring more pronounced peace other than that of the birth of Jesus; is He not the Prince of peace of Isaiah 9:6? God showered His divine love of eternality on creatures of Adam. What else can one expect from the LORD God who has a simple definition of “LOVE”? Read More

Why Callest Thou Me Good? (4)

0 Comments
The living element of sacrificial atonement must of protocolary essence be unblemished. One of the Messianic qualification is incorruptibility, which was appropriately inherent in Jesus. He is Jesus Christ, who in the beginning was the Word, and also the Word with God; the Word who was essentially God. The same One who was in the eternity past with God” (John 1:1-2). His essence is divine goodness. Amen! Read More

Why Callest Thou Me Good? (3)

0 Comments
From Hebraic etymological understanding shaddai stands for mountain or breast, hence, Shaddai is ‘the many breasted One’, very rich in substances and possessing the capability to feed, sustain and meet all desires of every need and want. Almighty has ten occurrences in the New Testament. Seven times as “Almighty;” once as “the Almighty;” once as “of Almighty,” and once as “omnipotent.” All the New Testamentary occurrences point to God alone. Why would the risen Jesus, “whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting;” apply to Himself “the Almighty” epithet of Divinity? It is simply because He has the same divine essence of His Father and of the Holy Spirit. Is Jesus Christ not the “Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of peace, on whose shoulder holds the eternality of universal government? In all realms of time: past, present and future He who is Almighty has the capability to take care of all He created both ex nihilo (without existing material) and those He created from existing materials. How can God the Father be good and Jesus, His eternal, express ‘Word', will not be good? Selah!Read More

Why Callest Thou Me Good? (2)

0 Comments
Who was involved in the Day one to Day six creation? The Lord Jesus was the One directly in physical connection with creationism. The outcome of Day one was “And God saw the light, that it was good.” One day two when the Creator took a look at the earth, the firmament and the seas, the Bible says, “…and God saw that it was good.” For the plants and their fruitfulness, “God saw that it was good.” On the fourth day of the lights, “and God saw that it was good;” was the verdict of the LORD God. “And God saw that it was good” when the animals came into being on day five. “And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day” (Genesis 1:31). Everything He made was good; the outcome of Day six was very good. If the Author of creationism does good things, it is simply because He is the Good God; He is the Good Shepherd. He must be good to be our Saviour as well.Read More