15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0
February 2021

WHO ELSE, IF NOT JESUS? (XIV)

0 Comments
Who is Helena Blavatsky? An occultist. What about Emanuel Swedenborg, was he not a satanic medium? The New Agers do not accept the Lordship of Jesus Christ. They do not believe that He is the Messiah. The Bible says something about them in 1John 4:3 “And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.” John the divine was warning against anyone wanting to have any spiritual bonding with the likes of Cerinthus and his Gnosticism. They would rather, like Cain, go with Satanism. The Holy Spirit had not taken them through spiritual parturition. To them he has these verses as well, “Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. 19) They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us” [1John 2:18-19].Read More

WHO ELSE, IF NOT JESUS? (XIII)

0 Comments
Is it not quite interesting to note that centuries before the advent of Islam the persuasive John 3:16 was all that Christians needed to populate the Kingdom of God, spiritually? Suddenly, God decided to start killing the unbelieving people with the sword of Prophet Muhammad, such that, "Paradise has one hundred grades which Allah has reserved for the Mujahidun who fight in His Cause," is all a die-hard Muslim needs to understand, and he is ready to destroy unbelieving lives. Isis of Syria, Boko Haram of Nigeria and the globally infamy: Al-Qaeda of Osama bin-Laden etc. thrive on verses like this to inflict the mayhem of terrorism on those who want nothing to do with Islamism. They will be beheading a victim as they all chorus, "Allahu akbar!" Why not? Is it not the gateway to Mohammedan Paradise? The core of Islamism is definitely jihadic. It is so crucial to Mohammedanism that he himself said with so much gusto that: "By Him in Whose Hand my soul is! I would love to be martyred in Allah's Cause and then come back to life, and then get martyred and then come back to life again, and then get martyred and then come back to life again, and then get martyred." [Sahih Al-Bukhari, 4/2797 (O.P.54)]. Jihadists are the true Muslims! Most certainly! They do the striking strives very religiously and to the utmost joy of Allah! Read More

WHO ELSE, IF NOT JESUS? (XII)

0 Comments
From this commentary of Qur’an 9:20, is it not so clear that ‘strive,’ as far as the Mohammedan Qur’an is concerned, is nothing but a sanguinary hostility against anyone whose belief runs contrary to Allah’s word (the Qur’an)? That Jihadists are accorded a celestial heroic welcome is a clear indication that you have to kill a non-Muslim to enjoy the bliss of heaven. The amatory reward of 72 virgin wives is an Islamic promise. The prophet of Allah’s one huge wish was to kill as many as his warring arms of jihadism could allow. He would love to be killed in the jihadic cause of Allah’s joy. The Islamic God is called Allah, made of two words: ‘al’ and ‘illah.’ While ‘al’ is ‘the’ definite article, the definition of ‘illah’ is simply ‘god.’ There is definitely nothing special about the term ‘God.’ Anything or anybody, accorded worship, can be god. The name, God, is simply the generic term for any object of veneration. Period. The words of Jehovah, the God of the Bible, says, “And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you” (Exodus 3:14). ‘I AM THAT I AM’ is the Hebraic YAHWEH i.e. JEHOVAH. Read More

WHO ELSE, IF NOT JESUS? (XI)

0 Comments
Jesus is not saying that He and the Eternal Father are 'one' Cardinal Person. That will violate Scripture. Each of the Members of the Trinity is a distinct Personage. None sees the Father perfectly; the Son, who is equal with the eternal Father, and the perfect manifestation of Him is the One who does; none else. Dou Mu. She most definitely reminds me of Semiramis. She is the Madonna of Catholicism. There, absolutely, can never be any mother in the celestial Rainbow Administration of the Almighty. Religion will allow a Dou Mu to receive idolatrous adoration. Only the Ones of the throne of the heavenly assizes receive the true worship: The Father, the eternal Son, and the Holy Spirit, represented by the seven eternal conflagration.Read More

WHO ELSE, IF NOT JESUS? (X)

0 Comments
The LORD God had earlier warned them, when He said, "But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die" [Genesis 2:17]. They died, and their progenies, all before their thousandth birthdays! God made them free moral agents. They were expected to exercise their free moral agency, contrary to Taoist didacticism. The Bible clearly states in Genesis 2:16, "And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:" to debunk the Taoism inability to identify man's will as the root his primordial problem.Read More

WHO ELSE, IF NOT JESUS? (IX)

0 Comments
Taoism, going by the fact of being a nature worship practice, is a system of religion that deifies and worships natural forces and phenomena. The Adamic sinful fall of Eden is the harbinger of religions. The subtle vocalism that rose from the chords of Satanism was "hath God said?" – for anything can be god. Lucifer had employed the foxy pad and the sly of ophidian creep to stage a meandering putsch in order to pilfer the domination of the earth. If Lucifer had asked, "Has the LORD God said?" –for only Jehovah is the LORD God– he would have agreed with the Eden first family that Jehovah alone be worshipped. There was no controversy as to who should be worshipped. 'God' in Hebrew, 'ĕlôhı̂ym (el-o-heem'), means: 'gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates.' 'Ĕlôhı̂ym, ergo, can be any man or deity.Read More

WHO ELSE, IF NOT JESUS? (VIII)

0 Comments
Many years back in my teenage years to the mid-twenties, I believed that both God and Lucifer were equally matched in power and wisdom or probably that Lucifer would do too much damage to Jehovah’s creation if they should engage in any physical war. Now that I know the Bible so well, I can say, categorically, that Satan, the Devil, is not in any conceivable way a match for the LORD God. Quoting Jesus in Luke 10:18 is, “And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.” Also, in Matthew 28:18, we have, “And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.” Satan is a conquered foe.Read More

WHO ELSE, IF NOT JESUS? (VII)

0 Comments
Buddhism has no answer to the hereafter. The simple reason is that, it has no architectural part in the hereafter design. The Author of creationism has already blessed us with the asseveration of John 14:18, "I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you." A wise person, therefore, will get Jesus involved. 'Comfortless' is an interesting Greek orphanos (or-fan-os'): 'bereaved ("orphan"), that is, parentless.' It also includes those bereft of a (teacher, guide, guardian). You want to know why Jesus used orphanos? The oracular afflatus of Isaiah 9:6 unravels the divinity of this Enigma when it prophetically gives one of His sobriquets as ‘The Everlasting Father!’ The Jews thought father Abraham was the biggest paternal shot until Jesus told them, "Before Abraham was, I am!" Amen! Read More