15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0
hoojewale

HISTORICAL CORROBORATION OF THE CHRISTIAN EASTER (three)

0 Comments
Believing in the sacrificial undertaking of reconciliation is the healer of man's sin of his nature. It is impossible for Mohammed's postulation to be true. If the lamb must be an unblemished one then only the historically sinless Jesus Christ is truly qualified to sail through this substitutionary death for mankind. He is the only person who has trod this sinful world without committing one single sin all through His thirty-three and a half years of His earthly sojourn. Any other substitute would have destroyed the Divine intended soteriological enterprise. Amen! Get born again!!Read More

HISTORICAL CORROBORATION OF THE CHRISTIAN EASTER (two)

0 Comments
Christ's firm command to them was to "....tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high." Which, O! Mohammad, of the Apostles got tired of being good and fervent Christians who decided to become followers of Mohammad, of Nestorius or Jacobus? Paul went only after Christians, so show me the scriptural or other documentation of Peter's killing of fellow apostles of apostasy.Read More

HISTORICAL CORROBORATION OF THE CHRISTIAN EASTER (one)

0 Comments
The God of the Israel had instructed them, about 1600 BC, in Exodus 12:11 “And thus shall ye eat it; with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste: it is the LORD'S passover.” This ‘Passover’ actually speaks of a protective covering. Jehovah will assume a covering God over them while the angel of destruction carries out the slaughter of the disobedient Egypt! A Christian, most definitely, is under the protection of the same LORD God. Amen.Read More

Jehovah’s Witness Myopic View Of Jesus (VIII)

0 Comments
One mind blowing, thought provoking thing He did in John 14:1, when He asseverated, "Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me;" was to display His equality with the Eternal Father! The truth is that it takes a certain affinity with the eternal Holy Spirit of Jehovah to apprehend the divine reality of His claims. Unfortunately for these Jehovah's Witness adherents, they hate to acknowledge the divine Personage of the Holy Spirit. A spiritual loss! Selah!Read More

Jehovah’s Witness Myopic View Of Jesus (VII)

0 Comments
He is both God and man: the son of man and the Son of God. Theologically it is called the hypostatic union. This is where God and man merge, forming an unprecedented compound of Jesus Christ. As a man, He is limited in wisdom, knowledge and power. As Christ, He is the Almighty, the wonderful everlasting Father. In Revelation 1:8 He calls Himself 'Almighty,' which is pantokratōr (pan-tok-rat'-ore) in Greek and it means: 'the all ruling, that is, God (as absolute and universal sovereign).' Isaiah announced Him as 'Wonderful' in chapter 9 verse 6. It is the Hebrew pele' (peh'-leh): 'a miracle.'Read More

Jehovah’s Witness Myopic View Of Jesus (VI)

0 Comments
Every verbalism that depicts Christological bankruptcy is a betrayal of abject ignorance. Alpha to Omega speaks of wordage and utterance. Alpha, being the first of Greek letters, makes Jesus the first to know before God can be known. What about from beta (the 2nd Greek letter) to psi (the 23rd or 2nd to the last letter)? Jesus fills it for: does the Bible not teach that, "And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence" in Colossians 1:18? Read More

Jehovah’s Witness Myopic View Of Jesus (V)

0 Comments
How could their (Jehovah's Witnesses) imperviousness allow them to believe that standing before them was the Personage of the prophetic afflatus, "Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah? this that is glorious in his apparel, travelling in the greatness of his strength? I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save" [Isaiah 63:1]? There is only one Jehovah made visibly known to those who truly seek Him – He’s Jesus. Are these Jehovah's Witness people of an errant Charles Taze Russell truly witnessing the true kerygma? Selah.Read More

Jehovah’s Witness Myopic View Of Jesus (IV)

0 Comments
Ask yourself why He should throw at His disciples, the conundrum of John 14:10, "Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me?" The phrase 'I am' is, interestingly the Greek egō (eg-o') esti (es-tee'). Esti is the third person singular of eime. Eime speaks more of 'existence' than of 'being.' Egō eime is exactly what the Septuagint explains God's response to Moses' question of Exodus 3:1, "And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?" Why would Jesus arrogate I AM THAT I AM to Himself; when this epithet is the same as Jehovah!Read More

Jehovah’s Witness Myopic View Of Jesus (III)

0 Comments
Too stubborn to give in to a superior argument based on scriptural fact the avowed disciples of Charles Taze Russell contend still with Proverbs 8:22 to prove that Christ was definitely an entity of creationism. "The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old" [Proverbs 8:22]. Qânâh (kaw-naw') is the Hebrew word for 'possess' and it means: 'to erect, that is, create; by extension to procure, especially by purchase (causatively sell); by implication to own.' Is the possession wisdom? If the LORD had to possess wisdom before embarking upon all His creative works, therefore, an urgent need to create wisdom for Himself arose, can these people not see the implications of the portentous blasphemy? It portends the lack of wisdom on God's part before creating anything. One who is deficient in wisdom is indubitably dumb. Is this what Jehovah God is?Read More

Jehovah’s Witness Myopic View Of Jesus (II)

0 Comments
If this Light is the Author of life how different is He from the One of whom it is said in Acts 17:28 "For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring?" There is no difference. The two are the one and the same Jehovah. The One, Father, sits eternally in heaven and the Other, His express image, is Jesus Christ. Amen. Cannot we just see that without God there is no life and that if it is lucidly understood that Jesus is the true Light then man's search for the deity of Jesus is over. Amen.Read More

Jehovah’s Witness Myopic View Of Jesus (II)

0 Comments
If this Light is the Author of life how different is He from the One of whom it is said in Acts 17:28 "For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring?" There is no difference. The two are the one and the same Jehovah. The One, Father, sits eternally in heaven and the Other, His express image, is Jesus Christ. Amen. Cannot we just see that without God there is no life and that if it is lucidly understood that Jesus is the true Light then man's search for the deity of Jesus is over. Amen.Read More

Jehovah’s Witness Myopic View Of Jesus (I)

10 Comments
Simple logic should inform anyone that whatever or whoever exists before creation is indubitably as eternal as Jehovah! 'Word' in the Greek is logos (log'-os): 'something said (including the thought); by implication a topic (subject of discourse), also reasoning (the mental faculty) or motive; by extension a computation; specifically (with the article in John) the Divine Expression (that is, Christ).' Logos is the totality of God's mind, thought, word and being. Did God have to create the Word before creationism? That will be tantamount to His Divine dumbness ere creation. So, the correct answer will be a resounding, "No! He wasn't dumb."Read More

I AM GRATEFUL TO JEHOVAH (II)

0 Comments
         My son, Ogoluwa, an IT giant, designed this on my 61st birthday.  (…continued from the 1st part) The word ‘terror’ of Psalm 91:5, in the Hebrew, is pachad (pakh’-ad) and it means: ‘object of dread; a (sudden) alarm (properly the object feared, by implication the feeling).’ The Lord God delivered me from the...Read More

I AM GRATEFUL TO JEHOVAH (I)

0 Comments
A needle tiny object falls or gets misplaced and a little, "God, please help me find this thing," prayer is all I need to say, for God to accord my ocular prowess the capability to beam my visual competence on this otherwise inconsequential thing. Small, inconsequential things do have their ways of needling you to madness. My deep rooted gratitude goes to God for attending to these little things which to You, dear God, “are not just little things in the eyes of Your love, oh! LORD!” as one of Reverend Chris Okotie's songs says.Read More

IS CHRISTIANITY AN IMPORTED RELIGION? (Part three)

0 Comments
The acceptable Judaism which Jehovah allowed through Moses had, in the days of Jesus, been stained with religion, causing it to assume the four superstitious headed sects of the Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes and the Zealots. Religion is an atypicality. It is a breeding sty of freethinkers. The seat of man's thought becomes the architectural workshop of the construction of the relationship between God and mortal man. God has to put in place a most accepted relationship between an errant man and Himself. Christianity.Read More

IS CHRISTIANITY AN IMPORTED RELIGION? (Part two)

0 Comments
The Church, figuratively, is a woman, the bride of Christ. Adam’s woman was the consummation of the first church and Christ did fellowship with them every day. Christ, in the midst of the first human couple, every cool of the day, is the assemblage of first Church on earth.Read More

IS CHRISTIANITY AN IMPORTED RELIGION? (Part one)

0 Comments
Jesus said in Matthew 16:18, "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." He did not build the church upon Peter. Peter cannot hold the Church together neither can he supply every spiritual need of the body of Christ. It is Christ's outward existence not Peter's. Two key words here are Peter and rock. 'Peter' in the Greek is Petros (pet'-ros): 'a (piece of) rock (larger than a precious stone); as a name, Petrus, an apostle.' 'Rock' is petra (pet'-ra) ‘Feminine of the same as Petros; a rock, cliff or ledge a projecting rock, crag, rocky ground.' Read More

THIS EVIL COULD HAVE BEEN JUST

0 Comments
This evil being is smart enough to find a way of legalizing his malicious escapade by deceiving the woman of Adam to do the unexpected evil. The earth, legally speaking, became his, and for which reason he could parade himself as the ‘god of this world,’ with a tremendous power. But He is not eternal like Jehovah. His days, therefore are very short.Read More

IS IT WRONG TO CELEBRATE CHRISTMAS ON THE 25TH DECEMBER? (part two)

0 Comments
If the mystical body of Christ, the Church, decides to make use of one out of the whole three hundred and sixty-five or the leap year days, in commemoration of His Incarnation, what is the big deal? Does He not own it all? Is the first day of the week, Sunday, not named after Nimrod, the sun deity? Did Nimrod create anything? Should we refuse to go to Church on Sundays just because Satan has hijacked the day for his global worship? Which of the days of the week is not named after idolatrous worship?Read More

IS IT WRONG TO CELEBRATE CHRISTMAS ON THE 25TH DECEMBER? (part one)

0 Comments
God, no doubt, made sure none kept the record of the exact date. It was His Divine incarnation. If He has no beginning and no ending why should the parturition of His humanity receive a public knowledge? It would not surprise me if Jesus was born on a Sunday. Creationism commenced on day one. It ended on day six. On the seventh day, the Sabbath, He rested.Read More