15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0
Christianity

WHO IS GREATEST AMONG THE PERSONS OF THE TRINITY? (Five)

0 Comments
Some may want to ask, “Why did Jesus say that the day of the end-time is unknown to all save the Father?” They believing that even Jesus, by His pronouncement, agrees that He does not know the day of tribulation. What many Bible readers do not understand is that there is a difference between the humanity of Him as Jesus, and His Divinity as the Christ, Who is the Word of God. Uncreated: for He exists before the creation of time. If through Him all things visible and invisible came into being, then He is truly God’s Fellow of Whom the Scripture says, “Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him” (Proverbs 8:30): where ‘one brought up’ is the Hebrew 'amown (aw-mone'): ‘skilled, i.e. an architect [probably in the sense of training].’ Can the historical documentation of universal occurrences ever stumble on a particular time when the Father and the Son walked side by side, growing up as brothers or as in architectural training? The Members of the Trinity, absolutely complete, do not grow in wisdom, stature or age. The Christ is as eternal as the Father, so is the Holy Spirit. Christ, ergo, knows everything including “the end of the world” of Matthew 24:3-36; it is just that this information was not passed on to the knowledge of Jesus, who happens to be His humanity and the covering of His Divinity. Selah!Read More

WHO IS GREATEST AMONG THE PERSONS OF THE TRINITY? (Four)

0 Comments
That the Holy Spirit teaches all things does not only give Him the essentiality of an intelligent Personage, the knowledge of all things tells any right thinking person that the Holy Ghost is, indeed, Omniscient. Just in case someone will want to argue that “all things” from this Scripture does not punctuate Omniscience of God, simply from the “whatsoever I have said unto you” point of Scripture, tending to limit the Holy Spirit’s scope of knowledge; what such a person is evidently in failure to realize is that to be the teacher of the Apostolic office and, by extension, the Church, the intelligence of that being must equal the One “In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” of Colossians 2:3. The Holy Spirit is more than a teacher, He must be at par with the “only wise God” of Jude verse 25, to wield the capability of teaching all things. We understand that God is of eternality, which speaks of limitlessness. No creature has the capacity and capability to search the unfathomable mind of the Creator, therefore, the ability of the Holy Spirit to search the mind of God with nonpareil accuracy, makes Him Omniscient God, the Creator! He, the Holy Spirit, having perfect wisdom, can, of course, teach the Church like no other.Read More

WHO IS GREATEST AMONG THE PERSONS OF THE TRINITY? (Three)

0 Comments
If this latent power comes from above to be invested on Christianity, then the Holy Spirit of our clothing is indeed the Almighty. He is the One who personally came down on the day of Pentecost to equip Christianity with power to preach the gospel, speak God’s language (in the glossolalia) and to perform miracles, which happens to be solely God’s métier. Matthew 12:28 “But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you.” By the power of the same Holy Ghost did Jesus perfect miraculous phenomenality. Acts 2:4 “And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.” Each and everyone of the one hundred and twenty first recorded souls of Christianity spoke in a language they never knew, each one according as the same Holy Spirit gave him the utterance. And the resultant force brought three thousand people, from different places of the globe to Jesus, ready to be born again to die no more. Hallelujah! How powerful is Jesus? John 10:18 “No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.” It is clear that His substitutionary death is purely volitional. But when the same Person says, “I have power to take it again,” it is of the puissance of Divinity. The power to lay down one’s life, and to make retrieval of the same life in a miraculous act of self-resurrection is definitely a mind-blowing exercise of the Omnipotence.Read More

WHO IS GREATEST AMONG THE PERSONS OF THE TRINITY? (Two)

0 Comments
Of truth is that, one of the reasons for the Trinity is for redemption purpose. But your first error is from the theological point, Damina. God must exist in plural forms if the creation of intelligent beings will not be that which gives Him an experience of plurality in vitiation of the Scripture which says, “…that in all things he might have the preeminence” (Colossians 1:18). ‘Preeminence’ is the Greek prōteuō (prote-yoo’-o): ‘to be first, hold the first place; to be first (in rank or influence).’ Your second mistake is the use of ‘become’ in the existence of Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. A ‘becoming’ is a production of a process. Any process must go through time, making the element of time an attendant witness to the act and art of the ‘becoming'. Time limitations of God’s Fatherhood, Sonship or of the Holy Spirit is an invalidation of the Creatorship of the Trinity. If Jehovah did become the Father, then the Father is devoid of eternality and the same goes for the Son and the Holy Spirit. What you, Damina, says about the possibility of Jehovah discarding the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit, if He desires, tells a good Bible student that Dr. Abel Damina has sat, and had wasted his time graduating under the tutelage Arius. In fact, Muhammad, the prophet of Allah, said the same thing – that God can decide to kill Christ.Read More

WHO IS GREATEST AMONG THE PERSONS OF THE TRINITY? (One)

0 Comments
The Fatherhood of the First Member of the Godhead is the title of His Divinity. His Fatherhood does not rest on a definitional stance of biological paternity. He is the Father because the Godhead decided that, the ever seated distinct Person on the throne of Majesty will have the distinction of the First Member of the Godhead: God the Father. The Father does not vacate the celestial throne at any given period. Because the empyrean throne can never be vacant due to the fact that God has no deputy, He must be there to receive the empyreal latria due to the LORD God of heaven and the universe. The counsel of the Godhead finds its verbalism from the vocality of the Father’s mouth.Read More

Dr. Abel Damina Taught That Enoch And Elijah Did Truly Die (4)

0 Comments
Jesus is the germinal Entity from Whose Person springs the well of salvation. The promise was made looking into the future, to the Incarnation of Emmanuel, by Whose blood true mediation comes to its consummation. While Ishmael represented the legality of religious ritualism that leads not to the soul’s salvation, Isaac is the prefiguration of the Messiah. Adamic existence depends solely on the Messiah for redemption. The Promise is absolutely free from any legality. God Himself takes the responsibility of its continuation and enternality of its security. What emanated from the bondwoman, incongruous to Divine purpose, lacks Godliness; however, the product of the freewoman conforms to the eternal counsel of the Divinity: for this reason the LORD God chose not Ishmael. Salvation must be a perfect mirroring of Scripture. Dr. Abel Damina is quite conversant with these theological facts but he disappointingly chooses to teach unscriptural stuffs. So far, I find it difficult to see a worse teacher of eisegesis than Dr. Abel Damina. I, honestly, cannot help telling myself, “When it comes to the exegesis of the Bible, Dr. Damina is simply a weirdo.” Exegesis is reading out of God’s word, i.e. teaching God’s protocol strictly according to the Bible. Read More

Dr. Abel Damina Taught That Enoch And Elijah Did Truly Die (3)

0 Comments
God meant what He promised in Genesis 12:7, ergo, a repetition in Genesis 13:15 “For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed for ever.” Did Abraham walk together with his progenies into the Promised Land? He did not, physically speaking, but the Bible tells us 9) “By faith he sojourned in the land of promise, as in a strange country, dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise: 10) For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God” (Hebrews 11:9-10). The Promise was given to Abraham and his progenies, biologically or by faith, faith, especially, in the finished work of Jesus Christ. Amen. Of course Abraham prepared the sacrifice of various elements but he could not bring perfection to the oblation. The One that Adam and his wife heard and saw; the same One that appeared to Moses, Who did present Himself on Mount Sinai before the congregation of Israel; and the very One that stood before Joshua to receive the latria is the same One who walk through the covenantal elements of Abraham’s sacrifice. Why? He alone can judge oppressors of His people while walking His own people into victorious encounters. This promise He made personally with father Abraham – not with Abel, Enoch or Noah. Read More

Dr. Abel Damina Taught That Enoch And Elijah Did Truly Die (2)

0 Comments
Only the beguiling will of an eisegete reads literary couch of metaphorical innuendos into the verses of the two prophets' discussion. There is not a smidgeon of doubt that Damina will definitely find any level of incongruity to fix his eisegetical ways of teaching the Scripture. Dr. Damina will not fail to disappoint me by saying something like, “You see, Jeremiah (or whoever he decides to be the author) used figures of speech to tell his story;” (as if the Holy Spirit has no hand in its scripting). Just because we find it very difficult to understand what we would not, out of laziness, and consequently allow the Spirit of God to direct us into an understanding, does not mean that they are couches of figurative language. Then one should not find it scripturally difficult to believe that the entire Bible is the writings of imaginations of literary works. The meanings of the Hebrew and Greek words, coupled with the contextual stances of the revealed Scriptures allow serious students of the Bible to come to the understanding of God’s protocolary documentation. This unreasonable assumptions goad many so-called theologians to say, “God created this present world in seven years,” awfully using 2Peter 3:8 as scriptural reference! Some will teach, without any scriptural care, “Lucifer slept with Adam’s wife to give birth to Cain,” while others believe that it was Cain who slept with his mother to produce the female of his own marriage! Take one millimetre away from the express understanding of the Bible, and you are a feeder of heresies!Read More

Dr. Abel Damina Taught That Enoch And Elijah Did Truly Die (1)

0 Comments
All Damina does is to pull out, “These all died in faith,” from Hebrews 11:13 “These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth.” The members of his churches, learning from a pastor fraught with biblical false teaching cannot see the simple defect in this man’s teaching. Let us navigate through the Bible to unearth Dr. Damina’s flaw or otherwise a perfection of his excogitation. Reading from Hebrews chapter 11 from verses 3 through to the 8th verse becomes scriptural eye opening that Damina is wrong. How can a lettered individual as Dr. Abel Damina be so impervious of the facticity of this translation when the first words of Hebrews 11:5 reads, “By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death? The Greek for ’translated,’ metatithemi (me-ta-tiy'-thee-miy) means: ‘1. to transfer. 2. (literally) to transport. 3. (by implication) to exchange. 4. (reflexively) to change sides;’ while ‘death’ is thanatos (tha'-na-tos): ‘death {literally or figuratively; properly, an adjective used as a noun}.’ Enoch’s faith has to do with his righteous walk with the LORD his Elohiym.Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (9)

0 Comments
With the exception of The Acts of the Apostles, written by Luke, every New Testament Book of the Gospels – Matthew, Mark, Luke and John – was written by the one whose name bears the title. The Quranic ‘Injil’ i.e. the Gospels were written decades after the earthly life, death, burial, resurrection, ascension and session of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ did not write one letter of what Muhammad calls injil – purportedly given to Jesus, the way Allah inspired the Qur’an, as it is found in the 57th chapter of the Quran in the 27th verse. Malicious and apocryphal are terms I can give to the specious claims of Muhammad concerning monarchical trampling of the Bible. Canonized Books of the Bible are genuine documentations of Divine inspiration. Other versions have their corruptions, but that cannot be said of the King James Version (KJV). The Qur’an is believed to have descended from heaven; how it failed to accord The Word of God, Jesus, His Divine rightful place indexes the malicious concoctions of the Qur’an. The monasticism of Muhammad, as the commentary runs on Al-Hadid 57:27, is jihad, which involves the slaughtering of unbelievers of Islam, in the cause of Allah. Jesus never, for once, led the thousands that thronged His ministrations to the killing of those who disbelieved His teachings and or Messianic office. You cannot find a more irenic Personage than Jesus. Mohammed is believed, according to G.J.O. Moshay, the author of “Who Is This Allah”, to have led sixty jihad wars on innocent people who either believed in idolatry or the salvation through Jesus. This type of hunting is known of Cain, the first antichrist, then of Nimrod – hunter before the Lord; its Islamic institution makes Muhammad anti-Christianity culpability. He is not different from the ultimate Antichrist. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (8)

0 Comments
The Jews, taking pride in being the covenant children of Abraham before Jesus, the Christ, told them who is greater by the asseverative, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am” (John 8:58). Why would Muhammad claim that his Islamic missionary prophetic office predates the creation of Abraham? Again I turn to the Bible for the answer – for Scripture must explain Scripture. John 17:24 “Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world.” Before the creation of anything at all, the Son had fellowship with the Father; which Muhammad could not lay claim to. Methinks Allah is just one individual. Where, I need to ask, cometh the plurality of Allah to be accorded the plural pronoun of “We”? Islamism will claim, “It’s in reverence to, La hawla wa la quwwata illa Billah”! I do not see any reverential sense in it. Study older manuscripts of the Qur’an, and you will not miss out on the plurality of the deities of Islam. Find out things about one of Petra's earliest chief among the gods of old Islam called Dushara. Dushara’s temple stood more imposing before the first and old Kaaba. The Meccan Kaaba is not the original; it is about the fourth or so. Therefore, I ask, “Why would Islam teach that the Meccan Kaaba is the handwork of Abraham and Ishmael?” The answer is simply cheap propagandist recognition of Islam. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (7)

0 Comments
Before Jesus conquered death, which He must, to consummate soteriology, He led the spirit of death, Satan and his evil principalities in a triumphant procession to heaven. Jesus is the first to resurrect from death; He, as the Adonai, must of necessity take preeminence in all things. Does the Qur’an give any empyreal insight into where Muhammad went after his death? Allah, obviously, did not prepare his last prophet for his eventual demise, to enable Muhammad to tidy up the Quranic documentation of his empyrean entry after death. Jesus did not only go directly to heaven, He sat, in heaven, at the right hand of empyrean Majesty. How can he be the first to resurrect when the genuineness of the Hadith clearly documents, “Narrated ‘Abu Huraira: “When Allah revealed the Verse: “Warn your nearest kinsmen,” Allah’s Messenger (pbuh) got up and said, “O people of Quraish (or said similar words)! Buy (i.e. save) yourselves (from the Hellfire) as I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment; O Bani `Abd Manaf! I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment, O Safiya, the Aunt of Allah’s Messenger (pbuh)! I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment; O Fatima bint Muhammad! Ask me anything from my wealth, but I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Wills and Testaments (Wasaayaa) Book 55, Hadith 16)? Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (6)

0 Comments
His name, Muhammad means praiseworthy; Ahmad means one who praises Allah more than others; Al-Mahi means Allah will eliminate Al-Kufr (infidelity) through him; he is Al-Hashir – the first to be resurrected, the people being resurrected thereafter; and he is also Al-‘Aqib, after whom there will be no other Prophet. These are very good credentials, no doubt. Of the one hundred and fifty Psalms in the Bible, David alone wrote seventy-eight of them. Go through Davidic Psalms and you will be marvelled at the piety of David’s heart of praise. Show me the Qur’anic praises of Muhammad, not forgetting to add those contained in the Hadiths as well; and I will open the Biblical Psalms and you can judge for yourself which of the hearts of Muhammad and David is closer to the Almighty Creator. The Davidic Psalm 110 opens with, “The LORD said to my Lord, sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thine footstool.” That which was not intended for the ears of man, God allowed David to eavesdrop. The first LORD (in capitals) is the covenant name, JEHOVAH, of God. The second Lord with capital ‘L’ is ‘âdôn (aw-done’): ‘From an unused root (meaning to rule); sovereign, that is, controller (human or divine); lord; master; owner.’ The spiritual status of Jesus as the ʻÂdôn makes Him the LORD and Owner of all entities of creation.Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (5)

0 Comments
Jesus was put to trial, was severely punished – as it had been prophesied –; He died on the cross and was buried. Who is this Allah that denies the Sonship and the crucifixion of the Christ? The Bible documents that He arose from death in the early hours of the third day which happened to be the first day of the week. Remember that the LORD of the Sabbath rested on the seventh day of creation. Right? Why would He rise up on the first day? Is it not to prove that He owns the first and the last days? Does it remind us of the reason why He is the Alpha and Omega? Selah! The kernel of kerygmatic essentiality of Christian gospel is the Golgotha substitutionary event. Hebrews 9:22, 25 & 26 “And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission. 25) Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; 26) For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.” The words of Jesus to His disciples concerning His resurrection is documented in Luke 24:44-47 This took place after He had risen from death, talking with two of His disciples (obviously of the seventy) who were mourning His death, while on their way to Emmaus. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (4)

0 Comments
Who is the Testator of the Old Testamentary order? God? Yes, it is the LORD God. If a better covenant must be put in permanent place, by whose legality of power can it come into existence? Of course, the same LORD God. Who said to the disciples, “This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you?” It is the same Christ, who followed them in the wilderness and showed His glory to Moses in Exodus 33:18-23; 34:5-8 & 34:29-34. Muhammadan teaching says, “Allah made the young man look exactly like `Isa, while a hole opened in the roof of the house,” in An-Nisa i.e. the fourth chapter, verse 157, and I am wondering who that young man was. John seemed to be younger than the rest of the disciples; if John was the one Muhammad meant, he is very, very wrong. John did not die immediately after the Golgotha crucifixion, he outlived all the Apostolic Fathers. Who is this Allah that denies the sanguineous, substitutionary death of Jesus, on the Golgotha cross? Muhammadan denial can only be an evil concoction of Satanism. This is the honest confession of non-followers of Jesus Christ: “Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God” (Matthew 27:54). Amen. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (3)

0 Comments
Who says Jesus Christ did not taste of death? That person must definitely be the worst calumnious candidate of Satanism. The death of the holy One of Israel had already gone the way of Divine ukase way back in Genesis 3:15 “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” By ‘bruise his heel’, the humanity of Jesus is meant. Jesus Christ died on the cross; He rose on the third day to deal a destructive, bruising blow on the Devil’s head. Why do you think God demanded Isaac’s sacrificial trial from Abraham? It is to legitimize a spiritual phenomenon: the LORD God experiments a similitude of event on terra firma. God would not go to any other person – who would disappoint Him –; to Abraham, His friend, whose faith in the Creator is definitely Gibraltar fixed, God went to perform a similitude of the ultimate Golgotha soteriological arrangement. Salvation must be sanguineous. The life of the Adamic creation is in his blood. For the sinner to regain fellowship with his Creator, blood must pay for blood. When they committed the original sin, a quadruped was killed, not only to engage in the exchange of the sinless animals for the Adamic sinfulness, but also and very importantly, to propitiate God. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (2)

0 Comments
“Muhammad” – in G.J.O. Moshay’s admittance of him, in his book, ‘Who Is This Allah?' – “is at best a philosopher.” The prophet of Allah, wanting at all cost to discredit Christianity, resorted to horrid regurgitation of the casuist that he was, when in An-Ni’sa, the fourth chapter, verse 157, the commentary says, “Allah made the young man look exactly like `Isa, while a hole opened in the roof of the house, and `Isa was made to sleep and ascended to heaven while asleep.” This is egregiousness of speciousness. Acts 1:9 “And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.” Verses 7 and 8 document what He was telling them. Do these verses show any sign of Muhammadan calumnious somnambulistic ascension? Why would Muhammad decide to use a cave as the rendezvous of Divine connectivity? The answer is very simple. He wanted to replicate the Mount Sinai phenomenon. The deception, I believe, is calculated to tell the world of religiosity that the God of the Bible had rejected Israel, Jewry and Christianity. How does one challenge the last prophet of the Most High? He needed to add that angle to make Islam God’s choice of religious worship. That is the reason for another cavernous rendezvous. The Qur’an contains 75% of the Bible. Unfortunately, the Bible is never up for any replication. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (1)

0 Comments
The microcosm of the entire thirty-one thousand, one hundred and two verses of the Bible is John 3:16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” This verse, which sums up God’s mind and intent for mankind, touches on His love, His gift of the only begotten Son, eternal damnation and the soteriology. The death of the Son is substitutionary: the life of sinless Second Member of the Godhead for the lost Adamic souls. Sin is a curse as we understand Ezekiel 18:4 “Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.” And Wisdom, the personification of the Christ, makes it clear in Proverbs 8:36 “But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.” Sin, for this scriptural reason, is truly a reproach. Not wanting to destroy sinful man, God designed redemption way out in John 3:16. When Prophet Muhammad began his Islamic campaign, one of the antagonistic teaching of the Islamic protocolary Qur’an against Christianity was an oppugnation of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (5)

0 Comments
Who gives divine commandments? Is it not the LORD God of the Bible? The uniqueness of Jesus Christ is His Divinity. Does He not give the commandments of 1John 2:4-5? Muhammad clearly admitted that Jesus is Christ, fine. But he, unfortunately, failed to acknowledge the deity of Christ – theological aberrancy! If Muhammad gets a pass mark in his admittance of Jesus’ Christological essence, his incorrigible bent on Qur’ainc denial of divine Sonship of the Christ evidently validates the antichrist mission of Muhammad. There is absolutely nothing separating the Father and the Son: for They, together with the Holy Spirit form one God to Whom the entire creations give latria prostration. The Father sits to judge. The Son, having been poured forth in propitiation, to avert eternal damnation, must be the One to lead us to the Father’s acceptability. Where is the Holy Spirit, a prying thought would ask? He took a dwelling in the born again Christian, authenticating the celestial citizenship of the regenerated soul. Salvation requires the process of believing the Son of God – which Muhammad rejects – in John 3:16; and the asseverative confession of the Lordship of Jesus over one’s life in Romans 10:9. Muhammad’s abnegation of the Sonship of Jesus makes him, Muhammad, a liar, according to the Scripture found in 1John 2:22-23. The fact that the invocation of Jesus is a must to benefit in the divine beneficence of spiritual regeneration substantiates the Deity of Jesus Christ. Amen. Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (4)

0 Comments
If centuries before the birth of Muhammad the Bible had pointed out the Lord Jesus to the world as the ‘reconciler’ or the ‘intercessor’ between God and man, how could Muhammad claim to be the unbiblical intercessor on the Judgment Day in Sahih al-Bukhari Book 60 Hadith 15? In fact the prophet of Allah said he would go as far as retrieving those who had been languishing in hell fire! Without equivocation this Islamic revelation is sourced from purgatorial didacticism of Catholicism; which St. Augustine (354–430) distinguished between the purgatorial fire that will burn off stains and the everlasting fire that consumes those who die unrepentant and unreconciled to the church: of which Clement of Alexandria and Origen believed that punishment by God must be to educate and, thereby, contribute to salvation. It had before them been a teaching of Platonism. And much longer than Plato, purgatorial Buddhism is the term ‘Naraka’ meaning “hell”. Islam has belief similarities with Zoroastrianism, Buddhism and sees Christianity through the unscriptural ritualism of the Romish Church. An inerudite Muhammad quaffed to inebriation the umbilical Popery doctrines of the Catholic Church. There cannot be two intercessors. Muhammad denies the Divinity of Christ only to use subtlety to present himself as the Messiah. Read More