15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0
Christianity

HE IS THE WORD OF GOD (four)

0 Comments
They found it almost impossible to acknowledge the theological connectivity that makes the Christ being Immanuel, the true incarnation of the Father. And the reason is not farfetched, there is absolutely more to Jesus than meets the carnality of human aggregatory eyes of judgment. Not until it is brought to your knowledge how can you fathom the quiddity of the Jesus Christ, whose goings forth is from of old from everlasting: the Ancient of days? What does it betoken, Christologically, by the assertive, “He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father”? Does this statement of Divinity not take us back to John 10:30 “I and my Father are one”? The Members of the Trinity constitute one indivisible God when the latria is involved. Each One of Them possesses celestial Fatherhood. The One Who vacates not the empyrean throne is God the Father. Seated also in the event of creationism or better still of re-creationism, is the Holy Spirit, providing all the energy to enable Adam to prefigure Jesus and for the Woman to represent the Church, making Him the Paternal source of being. Who is the Everlasting Father of Isaiah 9:6? Is it not Christ Jesus? Coeternality of the Members of the Godhead accounts for their coetaneous existence. The word ‘one’ of John 10:30 is heis (hice) meaning: ‘essence’. So, what Jesus told the disciples was, “I share same nature in all respects with the Father: the perfections, attributes, glory, that is read of Him, I, the Christ, equally possess. Philip, I am the express image of the Father, so, how could you ask Me to show you the Father?” Hallelujah!Read More

HE IS THE WORD OF GOD (three)

0 Comments
Matthew 2:2 “Where is he that is born King of the Jews? For we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.” Why worship a new born babe if the revelatory signs do not unveil the Deity from the third heaven; which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty? God revealed to the magicians the Incarnation of the Saviour of the world. They understood that this new born babe is the Messiah, the LORD God of the Bible. They understood that to the Incarnate Christ belonged the latria: to the Holy Babe they bowed in worship. John 3:13 “And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.” Nicodemus got further flabbergasted when Jesus intimated him with the words of the above verse. Quite abstruse this revelation of Him is. How could He, seated very close to Nicodemus, yet is seated in the throne room of heaven: quite abstruse. How else would one prove the facticity of the Divine ubiquity of Jesus? None can be present in more than one place. Omnipresence is the sole preserve of the LORD God, the Creator. The reason why I have to include the definition of ‘and' is simply to teach the gross error of some teachers of the Bible who insist on Sabellian theological defect which insists that there is only one Person in the Godhead. Kai is an inference to distinction between the Father and the Son in the Godhead. The word ‘are’ is semen (es-men’): ‘First person plural indicative of eime (we are). Eime, when it is used for the Divinity speaks of an existence outside of creationism. If Jesus used eime it means there are more than one Person in the Godhead. Read More

HE IS THE WORD OF GOD (two)

0 Comments
How can this Word ever remain the recondite essence of Divinity and yet remain a classification of object of creationism? The Word cannot be partial God and partial entity of creation. That will be freakish rivalry with the Divinity. The Divine Logos is very God of very God. Babel language experience gives irrefragable credence to Jesus' Omniscience. Billions pray everyday. To the invocating billions and thousands of languages Jesus Christ says, “If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it” (John 14:14). There is, most certainly, more of Jesus, the Word of God, than our eyes and understanding are capable of apprehending. The Author of creation must, of certainty, be in proper existence before His authorship of anything. The same reason why examination papers cannot be as old as or older than the lecturing examiner is what strictly accounts for the reason why the Author of creation must be in existence before the eternal past. The eternal past cannot be accounted for à la scientific notation. The Word of God is the Ancient of days. Adonai made His way down to our earth; headed straight to Abraham’s abode. The Visitant, escorted by two angels, held discussion with His host, Abraham, and even ate a sumptuous meal in His friend’s house. The LORD God, after His rapprochement with Abraham, left and went up to His empyreal abode; all these in historical facticity. Amen.Read More

HE IS THE WORD OF GOD (one)

0 Comments
I asked earlier whether God created the Word. This theological thought raises premonishment of blasphemy. Saying that God created the Word hypothecates that God, the Creator, prior to the creation of the Word, the Almighty was dumb. An agreement with this suppositional blasphemy is of Satanism, with an agenda of driving you mentally towards the extirpation of God’s impeccability. There is never a smidgeon of seam in the personality of Jehovah and His divine existence. Absolutely complete in all ramifications of conceivability is the Christian God of the Bible. Is this Word just a mere abstraction, having a dwelling only in our minds and devoid of palpability of living entity of intelligence? Now, if this Light is “the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world” of John 1:9; how is this Light any different from James 1:17 “Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning”? Every Member of the Godhead is as the Almighty as any Other of the Trinity. This enigmatic Word of God is definitely not an abstract figment of the intelligent mind. The Word of God has Divine epithet setting Him apart from beings of creation. Jesus is known as “which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty” which no doubt is the corroboration of His eternality. The Word has been before eternity past. His existence did not come to termination in the eternality of the past.Read More

What Does It Connote To Make God Happy? (2)

0 Comments
The Eden Garden is God’s house on earth, in which He placed Adam. God’s house is a place of worship. Spiritually, a Christian should not just attend Church services he must find something to do in one of the departments of its administration. This is where we speak of Labour of Love: in God’s House. The consistency of departmental voluntary work is so pleasing to God. This is what happens when you make God happy; it is found in 1Corinthians 3:14 “If any man’s work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.” The word ‘abide’ is the Greek menō (men’-o): ‘to remain, to stay stand fast.” Sincerity of dressing and keeping is when one builds upon the foundation, not with hay, wood or stubble, but with gold, silver and precious stones: for Jesus Christ is the foundation. Rewards are proportionate to how you have dressed and kept the things that concern the Creator. Having fought the good fight, the material gold, silver or precious stones, when put to the fire test, he is holding a thoroughly purified object of his victory. The joy you put in God’s heart dances over and over on the Divine mug of the Father; the Father looks at the Son, He catches the Divine fun; He places it on the visage of the Holy Spirit’s. Of eternality is the jocundity that our sincere dressing and keeping of His Word present to the Most High.Read More

What Does It Connote To Make God Happy? (1)

0 Comments
The very young Regional Pastor A. A. A. Alao and I saw one another and washing all over us was this effervescent smile on the faces of two bosom friends. In the same tenour, doing the will of God engenders a certain transporting spiritual affinity between the Creator and His intelligent creation. One hardly sees the connotative essentiality dwelling in the feat of putting smile on the Divine face of Jehovah. The consistency of your labour of love in His vineyard or otherwise does something to Him. You endear yourself to the eternality of His essence. You have, in fact, made friends with His Omniscience which aided the sagacity of Solomon. The LORD’s Omnipotence becomes your backbone. His Omnipresence takes care of everything that concerns you everywhere – all because you have made it your concern to make God happy. You see, growing up, I turned so philosophical. One of the philosophical fantasies of my belief was that Lucifer must either be as powerful as the LORD God or has something with which he exercises a certain leverage to enable his incorrigible pursuit of Satanism without ceasing all these millennia. My Adamic understanding continued to wonder why God continues to put up with this untold, horrendous global corruption. It was like the Almighty cannot do anything to stop the Devil’s maniacal crave. I believed that God would not want a confrontation with Lucifer lest the evil one destroys God’s precious creation.Read More

GOD DOES THINGS IN STYLE (Two)

0 Comments
Knowing that nothing is too hard for Him, sometimes He waits until one has lost all hopes, and completely distraught, then the LORD makes the miracle of divine entrance. At age sixty-five, who would expect Sarai to exhibit a showstopping sublimity of pulchritude? The same woman, the wife of Abram, could not produce any life from her matrix. There is every reason to believe that she had married Abram fifteen to twenty-five years earlier. When everything around them protested vigorously against the possibility, Jehovah rose to make nonsense of impossibilities. They were well stricken in their ages. Sarai’s procreative machinery had completely died. Time was most unfavorable to childbearing for them. What did God do? He ignited the feasibility of bârâ, the Hebrew word for ‘create – out of nothing'. God called that which is not as if it was. He must do things in style. It was a must for Sarah’s dead body to respond to the power of bârâ; leading to the bundle of laughter in Abraham’s household. Who showed Joseph all those dreams? Who empowered him with the accuracy of dreams interpretations? It is the LORD God, Who had made covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Why would the Architect of Joseph’s destiny allow him to go through all those harrowing experiences, knowing full well that Joseph could have been killed? It is because the LORD God, knowing that He is always in perfect control, there is, absolutely, nothing too hard for Him.Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (9)

0 Comments
With the exception of The Acts of the Apostles, written by Luke, every New Testament Book of the Gospels – Matthew, Mark, Luke and John – was written by the one whose name bears the title. The Quranic ‘Injil’ i.e. the Gospels were written decades after the earthly life, death, burial, resurrection, ascension and session of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ did not write one letter of what Muhammad calls injil – purportedly given to Jesus, the way Allah inspired the Qur’an, as it is found in the 57th chapter of the Quran in the 27th verse. Malicious and apocryphal are terms I can give to the specious claims of Muhammad concerning monarchical trampling of the Bible. Canonized Books of the Bible are genuine documentations of Divine inspiration. Other versions have their corruptions, but that cannot be said of the King James Version (KJV). The Qur’an is believed to have descended from heaven; how it failed to accord The Word of God, Jesus, His Divine rightful place indexes the malicious concoctions of the Qur’an. The monasticism of Muhammad, as the commentary runs on Al-Hadid 57:27, is jihad, which involves the slaughtering of unbelievers of Islam, in the cause of Allah. Jesus never, for once, led the thousands that thronged His ministrations to the killing of those who disbelieved His teachings and or Messianic office. You cannot find a more irenic Personage than Jesus. Mohammed is believed, according to G.J.O. Moshay, the author of “Who Is This Allah”, to have led sixty jihad wars on innocent people who either believed in idolatry or the salvation through Jesus. This type of hunting is known of Cain, the first antichrist, then of Nimrod – hunter before the Lord; its Islamic institution makes Muhammad anti-Christianity culpability. He is not different from the ultimate Antichrist. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (8)

0 Comments
The Jews, taking pride in being the covenant children of Abraham before Jesus, the Christ, told them who is greater by the asseverative, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am” (John 8:58). Why would Muhammad claim that his Islamic missionary prophetic office predates the creation of Abraham? Again I turn to the Bible for the answer – for Scripture must explain Scripture. John 17:24 “Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world.” Before the creation of anything at all, the Son had fellowship with the Father; which Muhammad could not lay claim to. Methinks Allah is just one individual. Where, I need to ask, cometh the plurality of Allah to be accorded the plural pronoun of “We”? Islamism will claim, “It’s in reverence to, La hawla wa la quwwata illa Billah”! I do not see any reverential sense in it. Study older manuscripts of the Qur’an, and you will not miss out on the plurality of the deities of Islam. Find out things about one of Petra's earliest chief among the gods of old Islam called Dushara. Dushara’s temple stood more imposing before the first and old Kaaba. The Meccan Kaaba is not the original; it is about the fourth or so. Therefore, I ask, “Why would Islam teach that the Meccan Kaaba is the handwork of Abraham and Ishmael?” The answer is simply cheap propagandist recognition of Islam. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (7)

0 Comments
Before Jesus conquered death, which He must, to consummate soteriology, He led the spirit of death, Satan and his evil principalities in a triumphant procession to heaven. Jesus is the first to resurrect from death; He, as the Adonai, must of necessity take preeminence in all things. Does the Qur’an give any empyreal insight into where Muhammad went after his death? Allah, obviously, did not prepare his last prophet for his eventual demise, to enable Muhammad to tidy up the Quranic documentation of his empyrean entry after death. Jesus did not only go directly to heaven, He sat, in heaven, at the right hand of empyrean Majesty. How can he be the first to resurrect when the genuineness of the Hadith clearly documents, “Narrated ‘Abu Huraira: “When Allah revealed the Verse: “Warn your nearest kinsmen,” Allah’s Messenger (pbuh) got up and said, “O people of Quraish (or said similar words)! Buy (i.e. save) yourselves (from the Hellfire) as I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment; O Bani `Abd Manaf! I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment, O Safiya, the Aunt of Allah’s Messenger (pbuh)! I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment; O Fatima bint Muhammad! Ask me anything from my wealth, but I cannot save you from Allah’s Punishment” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Wills and Testaments (Wasaayaa) Book 55, Hadith 16)? Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (6)

0 Comments
His name, Muhammad means praiseworthy; Ahmad means one who praises Allah more than others; Al-Mahi means Allah will eliminate Al-Kufr (infidelity) through him; he is Al-Hashir – the first to be resurrected, the people being resurrected thereafter; and he is also Al-‘Aqib, after whom there will be no other Prophet. These are very good credentials, no doubt. Of the one hundred and fifty Psalms in the Bible, David alone wrote seventy-eight of them. Go through Davidic Psalms and you will be marvelled at the piety of David’s heart of praise. Show me the Qur’anic praises of Muhammad, not forgetting to add those contained in the Hadiths as well; and I will open the Biblical Psalms and you can judge for yourself which of the hearts of Muhammad and David is closer to the Almighty Creator. The Davidic Psalm 110 opens with, “The LORD said to my Lord, sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thine footstool.” That which was not intended for the ears of man, God allowed David to eavesdrop. The first LORD (in capitals) is the covenant name, JEHOVAH, of God. The second Lord with capital ‘L’ is ‘âdôn (aw-done’): ‘From an unused root (meaning to rule); sovereign, that is, controller (human or divine); lord; master; owner.’ The spiritual status of Jesus as the ʻÂdôn makes Him the LORD and Owner of all entities of creation.Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (5)

0 Comments
Jesus was put to trial, was severely punished – as it had been prophesied –; He died on the cross and was buried. Who is this Allah that denies the Sonship and the crucifixion of the Christ? The Bible documents that He arose from death in the early hours of the third day which happened to be the first day of the week. Remember that the LORD of the Sabbath rested on the seventh day of creation. Right? Why would He rise up on the first day? Is it not to prove that He owns the first and the last days? Does it remind us of the reason why He is the Alpha and Omega? Selah! The kernel of kerygmatic essentiality of Christian gospel is the Golgotha substitutionary event. Hebrews 9:22, 25 & 26 “And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission. 25) Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; 26) For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.” The words of Jesus to His disciples concerning His resurrection is documented in Luke 24:44-47 This took place after He had risen from death, talking with two of His disciples (obviously of the seventy) who were mourning His death, while on their way to Emmaus. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (4)

0 Comments
Who is the Testator of the Old Testamentary order? God? Yes, it is the LORD God. If a better covenant must be put in permanent place, by whose legality of power can it come into existence? Of course, the same LORD God. Who said to the disciples, “This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you?” It is the same Christ, who followed them in the wilderness and showed His glory to Moses in Exodus 33:18-23; 34:5-8 & 34:29-34. Muhammadan teaching says, “Allah made the young man look exactly like `Isa, while a hole opened in the roof of the house,” in An-Nisa i.e. the fourth chapter, verse 157, and I am wondering who that young man was. John seemed to be younger than the rest of the disciples; if John was the one Muhammad meant, he is very, very wrong. John did not die immediately after the Golgotha crucifixion, he outlived all the Apostolic Fathers. Who is this Allah that denies the sanguineous, substitutionary death of Jesus, on the Golgotha cross? Muhammadan denial can only be an evil concoction of Satanism. This is the honest confession of non-followers of Jesus Christ: “Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God” (Matthew 27:54). Amen. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (3)

0 Comments
Who says Jesus Christ did not taste of death? That person must definitely be the worst calumnious candidate of Satanism. The death of the holy One of Israel had already gone the way of Divine ukase way back in Genesis 3:15 “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” By ‘bruise his heel’, the humanity of Jesus is meant. Jesus Christ died on the cross; He rose on the third day to deal a destructive, bruising blow on the Devil’s head. Why do you think God demanded Isaac’s sacrificial trial from Abraham? It is to legitimize a spiritual phenomenon: the LORD God experiments a similitude of event on terra firma. God would not go to any other person – who would disappoint Him –; to Abraham, His friend, whose faith in the Creator is definitely Gibraltar fixed, God went to perform a similitude of the ultimate Golgotha soteriological arrangement. Salvation must be sanguineous. The life of the Adamic creation is in his blood. For the sinner to regain fellowship with his Creator, blood must pay for blood. When they committed the original sin, a quadruped was killed, not only to engage in the exchange of the sinless animals for the Adamic sinfulness, but also and very importantly, to propitiate God. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (2)

0 Comments
“Muhammad” – in G.J.O. Moshay’s admittance of him, in his book, ‘Who Is This Allah?' – “is at best a philosopher.” The prophet of Allah, wanting at all cost to discredit Christianity, resorted to horrid regurgitation of the casuist that he was, when in An-Ni’sa, the fourth chapter, verse 157, the commentary says, “Allah made the young man look exactly like `Isa, while a hole opened in the roof of the house, and `Isa was made to sleep and ascended to heaven while asleep.” This is egregiousness of speciousness. Acts 1:9 “And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.” Verses 7 and 8 document what He was telling them. Do these verses show any sign of Muhammadan calumnious somnambulistic ascension? Why would Muhammad decide to use a cave as the rendezvous of Divine connectivity? The answer is very simple. He wanted to replicate the Mount Sinai phenomenon. The deception, I believe, is calculated to tell the world of religiosity that the God of the Bible had rejected Israel, Jewry and Christianity. How does one challenge the last prophet of the Most High? He needed to add that angle to make Islam God’s choice of religious worship. That is the reason for another cavernous rendezvous. The Qur’an contains 75% of the Bible. Unfortunately, the Bible is never up for any replication. Read More

MUHAMMAD’S QUR’AN DENIES THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS (1)

0 Comments
The microcosm of the entire thirty-one thousand, one hundred and two verses of the Bible is John 3:16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” This verse, which sums up God’s mind and intent for mankind, touches on His love, His gift of the only begotten Son, eternal damnation and the soteriology. The death of the Son is substitutionary: the life of sinless Second Member of the Godhead for the lost Adamic souls. Sin is a curse as we understand Ezekiel 18:4 “Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.” And Wisdom, the personification of the Christ, makes it clear in Proverbs 8:36 “But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.” Sin, for this scriptural reason, is truly a reproach. Not wanting to destroy sinful man, God designed redemption way out in John 3:16. When Prophet Muhammad began his Islamic campaign, one of the antagonistic teaching of the Islamic protocolary Qur’an against Christianity was an oppugnation of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (5)

0 Comments
Who gives divine commandments? Is it not the LORD God of the Bible? The uniqueness of Jesus Christ is His Divinity. Does He not give the commandments of 1John 2:4-5? Muhammad clearly admitted that Jesus is Christ, fine. But he, unfortunately, failed to acknowledge the deity of Christ – theological aberrancy! If Muhammad gets a pass mark in his admittance of Jesus’ Christological essence, his incorrigible bent on Qur’ainc denial of divine Sonship of the Christ evidently validates the antichrist mission of Muhammad. There is absolutely nothing separating the Father and the Son: for They, together with the Holy Spirit form one God to Whom the entire creations give latria prostration. The Father sits to judge. The Son, having been poured forth in propitiation, to avert eternal damnation, must be the One to lead us to the Father’s acceptability. Where is the Holy Spirit, a prying thought would ask? He took a dwelling in the born again Christian, authenticating the celestial citizenship of the regenerated soul. Salvation requires the process of believing the Son of God – which Muhammad rejects – in John 3:16; and the asseverative confession of the Lordship of Jesus over one’s life in Romans 10:9. Muhammad’s abnegation of the Sonship of Jesus makes him, Muhammad, a liar, according to the Scripture found in 1John 2:22-23. The fact that the invocation of Jesus is a must to benefit in the divine beneficence of spiritual regeneration substantiates the Deity of Jesus Christ. Amen. Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (4)

0 Comments
If centuries before the birth of Muhammad the Bible had pointed out the Lord Jesus to the world as the ‘reconciler’ or the ‘intercessor’ between God and man, how could Muhammad claim to be the unbiblical intercessor on the Judgment Day in Sahih al-Bukhari Book 60 Hadith 15? In fact the prophet of Allah said he would go as far as retrieving those who had been languishing in hell fire! Without equivocation this Islamic revelation is sourced from purgatorial didacticism of Catholicism; which St. Augustine (354–430) distinguished between the purgatorial fire that will burn off stains and the everlasting fire that consumes those who die unrepentant and unreconciled to the church: of which Clement of Alexandria and Origen believed that punishment by God must be to educate and, thereby, contribute to salvation. It had before them been a teaching of Platonism. And much longer than Plato, purgatorial Buddhism is the term ‘Naraka’ meaning “hell”. Islam has belief similarities with Zoroastrianism, Buddhism and sees Christianity through the unscriptural ritualism of the Romish Church. An inerudite Muhammad quaffed to inebriation the umbilical Popery doctrines of the Catholic Church. There cannot be two intercessors. Muhammad denies the Divinity of Christ only to use subtlety to present himself as the Messiah. Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (3)

0 Comments
Alpha and Omega is the ‘the all in all,’ without Whom nothing will come into existence. He calls Himself “the Almighty”. To be Almighty expresses His Omnipotence, Omniscience and the unfathomable Omnipresence. Everything has its source in the Almighty Alpha and Omega. Muhammadan Islam will not make mention of this essence of Christ simply because it will defeat Muhammad’s denial of Christ’s divinity. Revelation 3:14, “And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;” John quotes the Visitant to his Island of Patmos confinement. The Greek for ‘Amen’ is amen (a-meen'): ‘1. (properly) firm. 2. (figuratively) trustworthy. 3. (adverbially) surely. 4. (often as interjection) so be it.’ It comes from the Hebraic 'âmên (aw-mane'): ‘1. sure. 2. (abstract) faithfulness. 3. (adverb) truly; 4. so be it, truth.’ There is no way that Jesus would be the ‘AMEN; and He would not be God: for only God can be the personification of Truthfulness. Every uttered “Amen” is an invocation of the Son of God for speedy answer to prayers. Did Muhammad ever vocalize “’Āmīn?” If he did, as several times he said it, he called on the Son of God to agree with his petition before the Father, probably without knowing it! 2Corinthians 1:20 “For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.” Through Jesus Christ God made every promise. Without Jesus, the Logos, God does not say anything. Christ is the totality of God’s mind, will and purpose. Amen. Read More

MUHAMMAD DENIES DIVINE SONSHIP OF JESUS (1)

0 Comments
With the exception of Muhammad all other mentioned prophets (All Jewish) in the Qur’an did vaticinate saying, “Thus saith Jehovah”; Allah had no mentioning in their mouths throughout centuries of their Bible missionary vaticination. Millennia permanency of the Bible makes it the authentic scriptural relevance of theology. The Holy Bible furnishes its reader with historical dates, names, events and locations; all of which pass the tests of archeological and other researches. What else does one expect from the Bible, is it not the book of God’s Authorship? Without any scintilla of equivocation, I strongly believe that Muhammad should never have mentioned the stories, characters and events of the Bible to the establishment of his Islamic Qur’an. Prophet Muhammad should have limited himself to the twenty-five percent Islamic availability of the religion’s didacticism. But unfortunately, his dabble into the theological intricacies of the Christian divine protocolary exposes his stark ignorance or demonic assisted religious domination.Read More