15 49.0138 8.38624 1 4000 1 https://hoojewale.com 300 0

Why Callest Thou Me Good? (3)

0 Comments
From Hebraic etymological understanding shaddai stands for mountain or breast, hence, Shaddai is ‘the many breasted One’, very rich in substances and possessing the capability to feed, sustain and meet all desires of every need and want. Almighty has ten occurrences in the New Testament. Seven times as “Almighty;” once as “the Almighty;” once as “of Almighty,” and once as “omnipotent.” All the New Testamentary occurrences point to God alone. Why would the risen Jesus, “whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting;” apply to Himself “the Almighty” epithet of Divinity? It is simply because He has the same divine essence of His Father and of the Holy Spirit. Is Jesus Christ not the “Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of peace, on whose shoulder holds the eternality of universal government? In all realms of time: past, present and future He who is Almighty has the capability to take care of all He created both ex nihilo (without existing material) and those He created from existing materials. How can God the Father be good and Jesus, His eternal, express ‘Word', will not be good? Selah!Read More

Why Callest Thou Me Good? (2)

0 Comments
Who was involved in the Day one to Day six creation? The Lord Jesus was the One directly in physical connection with creationism. The outcome of Day one was “And God saw the light, that it was good.” One day two when the Creator took a look at the earth, the firmament and the seas, the Bible says, “…and God saw that it was good.” For the plants and their fruitfulness, “God saw that it was good.” On the fourth day of the lights, “and God saw that it was good;” was the verdict of the LORD God. “And God saw that it was good” when the animals came into being on day five. “And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day” (Genesis 1:31). Everything He made was good; the outcome of Day six was very good. If the Author of creationism does good things, it is simply because He is the Good God; He is the Good Shepherd. He must be good to be our Saviour as well.Read More

Why Callest Thou Me Good? (1)

0 Comments
One thing God does very well is to hide Himself. He is too good to be true. What did Cain do when God tried to make him see reasons, when He showed up before an errant first to open the matrix of the first woman in creation? Cain shunned God. So, maybe, God not wanting to be disbelieved, has been taught a lesson, so to speak. If Cain, the third of humanity, would shun the Almighty, what do we expect from generations of humanity? Cain was tutored to play the Antichrist, who happens to be the third man. As we have the first man, Adam, and the Second Man, the Lord from heaven, Jesus Christ (1Corinthians 15:47) so is a subtle pointer to a third man (not third Adam) evident. There can never be a third Adam simply because Jesus checkmated that by assuming the role of the Last Adam. Allowing the Antichrist to bear theological aberration of the ‘third Adam' vitiates the true mind of the Divinity. Adamic reality is an evocation of soteriological facticity. The antichrist, a non-partaker of soteriological phenomenality, is biblically the third man. Jesus asked, “Why callest thou me good?” then He concluded by pointing out the “Good One”, the Father, whose dwelling is an unapproachable light. Subtlety of Divinity, when you study those words carefully, did not deny the fact that Jesus is, no doubt, good!Read More

PROBATION [six]

0 Comments
We need to understand the alpha and omega of probation. It is to bring intelligent beings of God’s creation in alignment with His interest. Devoid of any scintilla of coercion, God wants us to use our free moral agency to do His will absolutely and never doubting the LORD God. Probation of the intelligent beings of creation is actually a blessing in disguise in that those who pass the trials have not only judged Lucifer for failing the obedience test, they stand to enjoy the glorious crowning culmination of the quiddity of divine probation. They will sit beside the Creator in the throne room of the Rainbow Administration of the celestial assizes. This had been the desideration of Lucifer, which he thought could be acquired with cunning forcefulness. He failed woefully trying to earn it. What he lost, God would give to those who satisfy Divine gaze into human probation free of charge.Read More

PROBATION [five]

0 Comments
Let us do some exegetical exercise on the Man, Jesus. He started his life in the matrix of Mary, the wife of Joseph, as a Man of Adam. The theological ascendency of his relevance is the quiddity of his vessel serving as vehicular actuation of the Incarnation. Inside Jesus Christ is the duality of Jehovah and man. Now, if the humanity of the Christ, Jesus, had committed one smidgeon of a sin, the entire soteriological concept would have been awfully defeated, absolutely. As the Last Adam, Jesus never got tired of getting led by the omniscience of Christ in him for every step of earthly endeavours, the LORD of creation, and the Christ continued to expect him not to falter spiritually. For thirty-three years and six months of the Incarnational tread upon the terra firma, Jesus Christ lived to turn as many as would desire to partake in the celestial citizenry from the course of hellish destination of every sinner. In the wilderness, Lucifer failed to derail the course of the Last Adam.Read More

29 YEARS A HOUSEHOLDER

0 Comments
Today the 11th of September, 2023, I have, by the special grace of God been a true member of THE HOUSEHOLD OF GOD CHURCH, ebulliently shepherded by the Pauline highbrowed Reverend Chris Okotie.                 It was in 1994, the eleventh of September, a Sunday, when I first attended the service in this church. One sermon, titled “Christian Cult” and I knew, most definitely, “This is my Church.” I cannot forget this day, the day I refer to as my own 9/11 albeit, mine is not a disastrous one.Read More

PROBATION [four]

0 Comments
David’s unwavering love for the things of his God made him the best choice to reign when Israel must have her own king. God had been watching him and knew he would be a good king. The judge, prophet and high priest of Israel, Samuel, after he had anointed him as the next king, the good LORD was so pleased with the teenage David who would not allow any smidgeon of bumptiousness towards the members of his family but humbly went back to his duty as the shepherd of the few sheep. To prove to all that David had truly gone through a successful probation, he could not help asking even of the gargantuan fiendishness of Goliath, “For who is this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should defy the armies of the living God” (1Samuel 17:26)? His probational days had built strong faith in him, knowing fully well that the LORD God is more than able. King Saul sought to kill David several times. Thrice David had the opportunity on platter of gold to eliminate his deadly pursuer; three times, like what is thought of a fool, David rejected the convictive words of his soldiers to kill King Saul. David’s knowledge of the word of God enabled him to make his way prosperous; leading to: “and then thou shalt have good success.”Read More

PROBATION [three]

0 Comments
Isaac, the next in the triune patriarchal line after Abraham, received his first probationary baptism when his father obeyed the instructions of God to sacrifice him. He was Christ-like in obedience to the purpose of the Creator. His acquiescence paved the legality for the ultimate Golgotha soteriological sanguinolency. God was not done with Isaac, who, at a young age, went through the distressing pangs experienced at the loss of the great woman of faith, Sarah, his dear mother. His marriage to a pulchritudinous and virtuous Rebekah though an exhilarating succour, he had to wade through another probational decades of infecundity of matrix fruitlessness. Holding courageously to the patriarchal baton after the demise of Abraham, his father even the friend of God, he lived to a very old age, a trustworthy saint in his walk with the Most High God. Down, he was found, but not out of alienation of God’s favour. Torturously bruised he felt, but courageously believed in the LORD his God. One of the ultraheavy apophthegm of all times from the philosophical heart of this great man of God is found in Job 23:10 “But he knoweth the way that I take: when he hath tried me, I shall come forth as gold.” After all said and done, Job, who did lose all to the machinations of Satanism, did strike gold, after God’s rebuke of his unnecessary excessiveness of painful outpour. Read More

PROBATION [two]

0 Comments
Looking for a man to establish His righteousness on earth God chose a dweller of Ur, Abraham, the first of the three patriarchs of Israel, who must go through trials. Thousands and thousands of the earth population get pregnant every month. Not so after decades of his marriage to Sarah. Even when they eventually gave birth to the promised Isaac, God came to Abraham in Genesis 22:2, “And he said, Take now thy son, thine only [son] Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.” The fear Abraham had for the Creator was an awesome respect; Abraham did not even as much as question the LORD’s request. Abraham’s probation earned him the title of ‘the friend of God’. If Abraham could release his one and only Isaac for this sacrifice, God should have the legality to decide to love the world so compassionately to give His only begotten Son to a dying world. Amen! Read More

PROBATION [one]

0 Comments
Entities of creationism, no matter how perfect in creation, are still under the sovereignty of the Divinity. The same sovereignty over creation explains God’s right to beam probationary light on the existence of beings. The LORD God does not put anyone on probation because He wants to know the hidden dwelling evil in the heart. He knows and sees beings, living, nonliving, animate or inanimate – all the centillions – at the same time and the intents of all, long before the existence of each one. Nothing, ergo, comes to the Almighty as a surprise. He has decided to probe us so that we will know that He is the LORD. The eternality of God’s juridical office makes the Eternal Father the Judge of all things. The judge is only known to swing into adjudicatory ukase after an act of legal interest is brought before the assizes. God made man a free moral agent, having the right to choose any course of life; the free moral agency does not becloud the mind not to know that there is an ultimate Judge.Read More

THE COMFORTER (five)

0 Comments
In the matters of the Church, Three Entities must be in charge, in the true spiritual administration of it. No angelic entity can take the place of the Members of the Godhead. You will never read anything like, “And the apostles gave to some, apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers.” Offices of the Church are truly dispensed by the Holy Spirit, through the understanding of the Father in the name of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is divine, or else He will never allow Himself to say, “I and my Father are one.” (John 10:30). Who, do you think, are the “All that ever came before me” of John 10:8? They are prophets and teachers of wrong doctrines; they are those who pretend to be in the messianic office. If those of the past who had not the Spirit of Jesus are termed “thieves and robbers” which include Nimrod, Balaam, Krishna, Buddha, Zoroaster and Confucius; definitely, any other who comes after Him, the likes of Muhammad, who had not the Spirit of Jesus, and consequently not the disciple of Jesus, is in that category of thieves and robbers. Was Muhammad ever a born again child of God? Muhammad preferred to be slave of Allah in sharp contrast to which members of Christianity are: God’s children of the Adoption. One must possess the Spirit of the Truth before working for the Most High God, the Creator of heaven and the earth and all things found therein. Jesus is the Comforter who promises another Comforter; and that is all I am trying to get across to you. Amen.Read More

THE COMFORTER (four)

0 Comments
The Comforter is expected to bring to remembrance what Jesus taught like no other teacher of the Word and one of the things He taught in the Sermon on the Mount is in Matthew 5:33-37. As many get born again, the Holy Spirit dwells in them forever. Only God can exist in more than one place, not to mention the over one billion of possible Christians of the world, as displayed by the Holy Spirit. Inside how many can Muhammad take a residence? The people of Christ’s address were His own following disciples, did anyone of them live to see Muhammad? The prophecy did come true ten days after the Lord’s ascension, on the day of Pentecost in sharp contrast to six centuries later of Muhammad’s entrance into Allah’s prophetic office. Most definitely, Muhammad could not have been the promise of ‘another Comforter'; he is too human, too detached from Christological facticity to measure up for the office the Comforter. This Comforter is scripturally the Third Member of the Godhead, being of the Divinity; is Muhammad the fourth member of the Godhead to possess the criterion of the Comforter? Is Jesus divine?Read More

THE COMFORTER (three)

0 Comments
The three Members of the Godhead constitute one God. The Trinity is one God, yet three; three but one in deed, thought and essence. It is an unimaginable conundrum. Jehovah is good. The adjectival case of this Divine goodness does not exist in grammatical comparative or superlative sense. Its uniqueness makes the Divinity the only good One. Good, from divine point of understanding, cannot, in any way be adversely affected by evil of any gargantuan fiendishness. The evil spirit of misunderstanding cannot, in any way, wage any successful war of separation against the Members of the Godhead. Muhammad, obviously, failed to understand that each of the distinct Personage of the Trinity is not only the Omnipotent, each one of them is omnipresent; each One of the Triune distinction of the Godhead is properly an Omniscience; if so, how could any other entity or entities gain intrusion into the affairs of the all-knowing prepossession of the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit? It is an impossibility! The Allah of Muhammad, who taught his prophet this falsehood concerning separation of the Godhead, is not all-knowing, to have delved into the disparagement of the Bible. (Qur’an) An-Nisa’ 4:157 “And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain.” Who told Muhammad that Jesus was not crucified? It is Allah, a god bereft of scriptural facticity. Do we not read of Jesus as He chided the disciples for unbelief after His resurrection? Luke 24:46 “And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day:” Read More

THE COMFORTER (two)

0 Comments
The extant Comforter, whose physical presence was with the apostles in John 14:16-17 is none other than the Personage of John 14:18 “I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.” How possible will Jesus, who would have been seated in the heavenly assizes, be able to come to them? The three Persons in the Godhead are intrinsically one. Is the Holy Spirit not the Spirit of the eternality of both the Father and Son? Romans 8:9 reads “But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.” Of the Holy Spirit it says in Galatians 4:6 “And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.” In a malicious attempt to bring Muhammad into the glorious light of the Bible, for religious recognition, they twist the Islamism of the Qur’an and teach that Jesus told His disciples to expect another prophet, using John 14:16 as biblical validity of Muhammadan emergence as the prophet, in fact, according to Muhammad, the only prophet after Jesus Christ. When someone decides to employ lies in propagation of whatever cause, I feel very happy; knowing fully well that telling lies only gets one backed for just a little while owing to the transiency of falsehood. Does it not say, “…the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things,?” which makes me begin to wonder if Muhammad got his endowment of omniscience by Allah: for it takes the faculty of all knowing to achieve the teaching of all divine things. It also reads, “…and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.”Read More

THE COMFORTER (one)

0 Comments
Whether it is ignorance or sheer determined crave for wrong didacticism of Scripture, the Jehovah’s Witness Society teaches that the Holy Spirit is just a mere wind. Charles Taze Russell’s (1852-1916) foundation of JW believes the Holy Spirit has no life, ergo, is not a Personage. So, what are we to make of this Scripture, “But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me” (John 15:26)? One of JW members who came to my house said, “But you know that the Bible says that inanimate things do teach of God’s existence?” Fine, but to let him know that he was still hooked like the captured fish out of water, I showed him John 14:26, “But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.” I asked the JW guys, can a mere wind, as you put it, teach omnisciently, all theological things? They could not give an answer to the ponderous profundity of my enquiry; I, therefore, proceeded with, “He must be the eternal Omniscience to know all things!” Showing them from God’s protocol, the Bible, I opened to Acts 13:2 “As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, the Holy Ghost said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them.” Is this not the Christ-promised Comforter? He is not only dwelling amongst them, He speaks words of intellectualism to their hearing ears, and also, He makes appointments of Apostleship, which is purely of the Godhead. Amen.Read More

FOLLOWING THE LORD GOD OF THE BIBLE (2)

0 Comments
From the beginning of Adamic life man had loved to follow the Creator. The Devil knows how to get you to unfollow the LORD God. Lucifer went all out to establish religions with the malicious motive of deviation from the righteous path of the Word of God. The religions tend to wear clothes of righteousness but incessantly deny the power thereof. The Word of God is Jesus. Christ is seen in these religions but not one of them teaches John 3 verse 3. They will vehemently disagree with John 3 verse 16. Judas Iscariot wore a form of godliness, following Jesus Christ for three and a half years. But Judas denied himself the power of reconciliation, very much like Cain of old. God spoke to Cain in Genesis 4:7 “If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.” It was a Fatherly solution to the sin of disobedience. But Cain’s predisposition is like the proverbial hunting dog that shuns the shrill of the “Let’s go home” whistle from the hunter lord and owner; it gets momentary lost and gets into the claws and jaws of ravenous wild animals. Following God is predicated on the obedience to His Word. Amen.Read More

FOLLOWING THE LORD GOD OF THE BIBLE (1)

0 Comments
Israel followed the LORD God, who led them in the Exodus 1)            In the Garden of Eden, the male Adam did not have to trek or go long distance to put food on the table. Every life’s sustaining edibility was right there in the Garden, which doubles as his home. When the installation of sin...Read More

Do You Have To Marry To Prove A Point? (8)

0 Comments
Channel, virtuously, all the energetic help of your femininity towards the meet of your husband’s desires, as long as those intents of his bourne are not in direct antagonism to the express Word of God. To aid your official role as the help meet for him; submission is the key for the perfection of your uxorial mission. Every one of the disciples was involved in a business or carrier. They forsook all to perfect their walk with the Master – submission. How can any wife claim to be the help meet for the husband without the required submission? Only a Jezebel of a wife jettisons submission. Marriage is a missionary work. It brings heaven down to the earth. In empyrean assizes, bearing witness, there are three in the Godhead; and on earth, representing the unity of the Trinity is the Christian marriage where the twain (male and female created He them) exhibit love and submission according to the will of Jesus, the Grand Groom of the Bride, the Church. If you, the husband, should for one second, hold back the duty of love towards your wife, you are masquerading as a bastard. Try to imagine the resultant effect if Jesus Christ would not bring to consummation, the agapē of the Father’s heart: soteriology would be a mere mirage. The husband who will not adorn his wife with love is definitely an Antichrist. You must love your wife! Honestly, we do not seem to understand that our failure to appreciate the seriousness of marriage is the injection of ignorance by the unrelenting hard work of Satanism. Selah. We hardly remember that two things bring soteriological reality into actuation: the agapē of Jehovah and the heart of submission on the part of the believing born again Christian. Let the husband and the wife ponder seriously on this facticity. Amen. If you are not making money to sustain the family – as the family provider –, something is terribly wrong with you.Read More

Do You Have To Marry To Prove A Point? (7)

0 Comments
Your husband cannot tell you not to pray. The Word of God has been in existence before the man, therefore, the husband cannot breathe superiority over the Word of God which categorically says, “Pray without ceasing” (1Thessalonians 5:17. He cannot tell you, “Stop going to Church” because he will be impugning Hebrews 10:25, “Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is;” neither can your husband tell you to stop believing the spiritual headship of Jesus: for He is the great Shepherd of the sheep, that the God of peace brought again from the dead through the blood of the everlasting covenant (Hebrews 13:20). Forbidding us to lie is the Ninth Commandment; he cannot tell you to lie. Your husband cannot decide to have sex with you through your anus. It is not any different from sodomitical lust of Satanism as Paul makes us understand in Romans 1:27. The husband’s authority is within the limits of the Word of God.Read More

Do You Have To Marry To Prove A Point? (6)

0 Comments
In like manner the wife’s ‘help meet’ stance is an official role. She holds the office of the other personality of the head of the family. This other person thinks, knows, wills like the husband and supports to actuation all his positive desires towards the service to God, as a family man. She becomes the other head that gives credence to proverbial two heads are better than one. The woman positions herself as the prayer warrior of the home. Her loyalty to her unflinching support to the husband’s aspirations provokes divine accelerated answers to the family’s prayer requests. The true position of the husband and the wife, albeit not three in number, is akin to the close operational quiddity of the Trinity. They must get it right, or else they are mere worthless actors. The wife, ergo, is under Divine spirit of mitzvah to stand as the greatest supporter of the husband’s priestly office. What does the efforts of her official role result to? The husband finds it much less arduous going through the rigours of family business. He is truly blessed, having found the good thing. A whole lot is at stake if couples fail to get it right. Selah! A headless body is a cadaver. Without the contribution of a husband the marriage suffers moribundity. Conversely, bodiless heads are freakish; without the wives' help meet submissions, what are brought before the Author of marriage are episodic proofs of parodic attempts. Read More